Application of the noise power spectrum in modern diagnostic MDCT: part II. Noise power spectra and signal to noise

Balancing dose and image quality requires signal-to-noise (SNR) metrics which incorporate both the variance and the spatial frequency characteristics of noise. In this study, the non-prewhitening matched filter SNR metric is calculated for 2 mm slices of a 1 cm diameter sphere under three different conditions: (1) constant pixel standard deviation, (2) constant dose and (3) constant reconstruction filter. For the constant pixel standard deviation condition, an increase of 260% in SNR was found with increasing filter sharpness. For constant dose, the SNR remained level for smooth to medium filters, then declined by up to 55% with increasing filter sharpness. For a constant reconstruction filter, the SNR increased with dose, but not as high as photon statistics would predict. However, when structured noise was removed from the noise power spectrum, the SNR did vary with quanta statistics. These results offer protocol design guidance for low-frequency-dominated objects.

[1]  R G Swensson,et al.  Display thresholding of images and observer detection performance. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  R. C. Warren.  Detectability of low-contrast features in computed tomography. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  K. Hanson,et al.  Detectability in computed tomographic images. , 1979, Medical physics.

[4]  D. C. Barber,et al.  Medical Imaging-The Assessment of Image Quality , 1996 .

[5]  J. H. Williams,et al.  Design of a Double X-ray Spectrometer , 1929 .

[6]  Sandy Napel,et al.  CT colonography: does improved z resolution help computer-aided polyp detection? , 2003, Medical physics.

[7]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[8]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Application of information theory to the assessment of computed tomography. , 1979, Medical physics.

[9]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  K Doi,et al.  A comparison of physical image quality indices and observer performance in the radiographic detection of nylon beads. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Volumetric model and human observer comparisons of tumor detection for whole-body positron emission tomography. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[12]  S H Fox,et al.  The effect of helical pitch and beam collimation on the lesion contrast and slice profile in helical CT imaging. , 1996, Medical physics.

[13]  Philip F. Judy,et al.  Lesion detection and signal–to–noise ratio in CT images , 1981 .

[14]  Kunio Doi,et al.  An Empirical Investigation Of Variability In Contrast-Detail Diagram Measurements , 1983, Other Conferences.

[15]  R D Nawfel,et al.  Contrast-detail curves for liver CT. , 1992, Medical physics.

[16]  R G Swensson,et al.  Flattening of the contrast-detail curve for large lesions on liver CT images. , 1994, Medical physics.

[17]  K Faulkner,et al.  Analysis of x-ray computed tomography images using the noise power spectrum and autocorrelation function. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Walter Huda,et al.  Patient size and x-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. II. Image quality. , 2004, Medical physics.

[19]  R G Swensson,et al.  Detection of small focal lesions in CT images: effects of reconstruction filters and visual display windows. , 1985, The British journal of radiology.