A novel fast full inversion based breast ultrasound elastography technique.

Cancer detection and classification have been the focus of many imaging and therapeutic research studies. Elastography is a non-invasive technique to visualize suspicious soft tissue areas where tissue stiffness is used as image contrast mechanism. In this study, a breast ultrasound elastography system including software and hardware is proposed. Unlike current elastography systems that image the tissue strain and present it as an approximation to relative tissue stiffness, this system is capable of imaging the breast absolute Young's modulus in fast fashion. To improve the quality of elastography images, a novel system consisting of two load cells has been attached to the ultrasound probe. The load cells measure the breast surface forces to be used for calculating the tissue stress distribution throughout the breast. To facilitate fast imaging, this stress calculation is conducted by an accelerated finite element method. Acquired tissue displacements and surface force data are used as input to the proposed Young's modulus reconstruction technique. Numerical and tissue mimicking phantom studies were conducted for validating the proposed system. These studies indicated that fast imaging of breast tissue absolute Young's modulus using the proposed ultrasound elastography system is feasible. The tissue mimicking phantom study indicated that the system is capable of providing reliable absolute Young's modulus values for both normal tissue and tumour as the maximum Young's modulus reconstruction error was less than 6%. This demonstrates that the proposed system has a good potential to be used for clinical breast cancer assessment.

[1]  Kaamran Raahemifar,et al.  Statistical finite element method for real-time tissue mechanics analysis , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[2]  Joseph J O'Hagan,et al.  Measurement of the hyperelastic properties of 44 pathological ex vivo breast tissue samples , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  J Ophir,et al.  Fundamental limitations on the contrast-transfer efficiency in elastography: an analytic study. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  J. Ophir,et al.  Visualization of HIFU-induced lesion boundaries by axial-shear strain elastography: a feasibility study. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Reconstructive elasticity imaging for large deformations , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Motion Estimation in Ultrasound Images Using Time Domain Cross Correlation With Prior Estimates , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Novel ultrasound elastography system for multifocal breast cancer assessment , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[8]  Jonathan Bishop,et al.  A constrained modulus reconstruction technique for breast cancer assessment , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  R. Mumper,et al.  Nanomedicinal strategies to treat multidrug-resistant tumors: current progress. , 2010, Nanomedicine.

[10]  D. Plewes,et al.  Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique-based investigation of 169 samples , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Abbas Samani,et al.  A full inversion unconstrained ultrasound elastography technique for prostate cancer assessment , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[12]  B. Garra.  Imaging and Estimation of Tissue Elasticity by Ultrasound , 2007, Ultrasound quarterly.

[13]  Assad A Oberai,et al.  Quantitative three-dimensional elasticity imaging from quasi-static deformation: a phantom study , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A discrete dynamic contour model , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[15]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  A real-time method for breast cancer diagnosis using optical flow , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[16]  Abbas Samani,et al.  A constrained reconstruction technique of hyperelasticity parameters for breast cancer assessment. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  D. Plewes,et al.  An inverse problem solution for measuring the elastic modulus of intact ex vivo breast tissue tumours , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  J Ophir,et al.  Elastographic Dynamic Range Expansion Using Variable Applied Strains , 1997, Ultrasonic imaging.

[19]  Jingfeng Jiang,et al.  Linear and nonlinear elasticity imaging of soft tissue in vivo: demonstration of feasibility , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[21]  M. Fink,et al.  Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  Abbas Samani,et al.  Measuring the elastic modulus of ex vivo small tissue samples. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  F. Kallel,et al.  Elastographic Imaging of the Normal Canine Prostate In Vitro , 1999, Ultrasonic imaging.

[24]  J. Bamber,et al.  Quantitative elasticity imaging: what can and cannot be inferred from strain images. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Robert Rohling,et al.  Real-time solution of the finite element inverse problem of viscoelasticity , 2011 .

[26]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastography: Ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues , 1999, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.