Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening at Routine Abdominal and Thoracic CT: Normative L1 Trabecular Attenuation Values in More than 20 000 Adults.

Background Abdominal and thoracic CT provide a valuable opportunity for osteoporosis screening regardless of the clinical indication for imaging. Purpose To establish reference normative ranges for first lumbar vertebra (L1) trabecular attenuation values across all adult ages to measure bone mineral density (BMD) at routine CT. Materials and Methods Reference data were constructed from 20 374 abdominal and/or thoracic CT examinations performed at 120 kV. Data were derived from adults (mean age, 60 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 56.1% [11 428 of 20 374] women). CT examinations were performed with (n = 4263) or without (n = 16 111) intravenous contrast agent administration for a variety of unrelated clinical indications between 2000 and 2018. L1 Hounsfield unit measurement was obtained either with a customized automated tool (n = 11 270) or manually by individual readers (n = 9104). The effects of patient age, sex, contrast agent, and manual region-of-interest versus fully automated L1 Hounsfield unit measurement were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results Mean L1 attenuation decreased linearly with age at a rate of 2.5 HU per year, averaging 226 HU ± 44 for patients younger than 30 years and 89 HU ± 38 for patients 90 years or older. Women had a higher mean L1 attenuation compared with men (P < .008) until menopause, after which both groups had similar values. Administration of intravenous contrast agent resulted in negligible differences in mean L1 attenuation values except in patients younger than 40 years. The fully automated method resulted in measurements that were average 21 HU higher compared with manual measurement (P < .004); at intrapatient subanalysis, this difference was related to the level of transverse measurement used (midvertebra vs off-midline level). Conclusion Normative ranges of L1 vertebra trabecular attenuation were established across all adult ages, and these can serve as a quick reference at routine CT to identify adults with low bone mineral density who are at risk for osteoporosis. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Smith in this issue.

[1]  Pim A. de Jong,et al.  Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study , 2015, European Radiology.

[2]  J. Ioannidis The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005. , 2018, JAMA.

[3]  Nathan Lay,et al.  Population-based opportunistic osteoporosis screening: Validation of a fully automated CT tool for assessing longitudinal BMD changes. , 2019, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  B. Dawson-Hughes,et al.  The Recent Prevalence of Osteoporosis and Low Bone Mass in the United States Based on Bone Mineral Density at the Femoral Neck or Lumbar Spine , 2014, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  M. Phipps,et al.  Screening for Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2018, JAMA.

[6]  Chun Kee Chung,et al.  Correlation between Bone Mineral Density Measured by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Hounsfield Units Measured by Diagnostic CT in Lumbar Spine , 2013, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[7]  Sundeep Khosla,et al.  Population‐Based Study of Age and Sex Differences in Bone Volumetric Density, Size, Geometry, and Structure at Different Skeletal Sites , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  S. Khosla,et al.  A Crisis in the Treatment of Osteoporosis , 2016, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  P. Bearcroft,et al.  The reliability of measuring the density of the L1 vertebral body on CT imaging as a predictor of bone mineral density. , 2017, Clinical radiology.

[10]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Fracture Prediction by Computed Tomography and Finite Element Analysis: Current and Future Perspectives , 2018, Current Osteoporosis Reports.

[11]  P. Miller Underdiagnosis and Undertreatment of Osteoporosis: The Battle to Be Won. , 2016, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[12]  A. Tosteson,et al.  Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis‐Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–2025 , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Effect of IV contrast on lumbar trabecular attenuation at routine abdominal CT: correlation with DXA and implications for opportunistic osteoporosis screening , 2015, Osteoporosis International.

[14]  H. Wahner,et al.  Updated Data on Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Levels of US Adults , 1998, Osteoporosis International.

[15]  E. Pompe,et al.  Intravenous contrast injection significantly affects bone mineral density measured on CT , 2015, European Radiology.

[16]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: Bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard , 2011, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  P. Zysset,et al.  Clinical Use of Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Advanced Techniques in the Management of Osteoporosis in Adults: the 2015 ISCD Official Positions-Part III. , 2015, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[18]  R. Eastell,et al.  Osteoporosis in men: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. , 2012, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[19]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using the sagittal reconstruction from routine abdominal CT for combined assessment of vertebral fractures and density , 2016, Osteoporosis International.

[20]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis Using Abdominal Computed Tomography Scans Obtained for Other Indications , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  F. O'Brien,et al.  Variation of trabecular microarchitectural parameters in cranial, caudal and mid‐vertebral regions of the ovine L3 vertebra , 2009, Journal of anatomy.

[22]  L. Melton,et al.  A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis. , 2008, Bone.

[23]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Unreported vertebral body compression fractures at abdominal multidetector CT. , 2013, Radiology.

[24]  Anouk L. M. Eikendal,et al.  Inter-observer and inter-examination variability of manual vertebral bone attenuation measurements on computed tomography , 2016, European Radiology.

[25]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Future Osteoporotic Fracture Risk Related to Lumbar Vertebral Trabecular Attenuation Measured at Routine Body CT , 2018, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[26]  J. Cauley,et al.  Worldwide prevalence and incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures , 2017, Osteoporosis International.

[27]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis Using Body CT Scans Obtained for Other Indications: the UW Experience , 2017, Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[28]  N. Watts,et al.  2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference: Task Force on Normative Databases. , 2013, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[29]  J. Bilezikian,et al.  Osteoporosis Diagnosis in Men: The T-Score Controversy Revisited , 2014, Current Osteoporosis Reports.