Primary Care Physicians’ Support of Shared Decision Making for Different Cancer Screening Decisions

Background. Despite its widespread advocacy, shared decision making (SDM) is not routinely used for cancer screening. To better understand the implementation barriers, we describe primary care physicians’ (PCPs’) support for SDM across diverse cancer screening contexts. Methods. Surveys were mailed to a random sample of USA-based PCPs. Using multivariable logistic regression analyses, we tested for associations of PCPs’ support of SDM with the US Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) assigned recommendation grade, assessed whether the decision pertained to not screening older patients, and the PCPs’ autonomous v. controlled motivation-orientation for using SDM. Results. PCPs (n = 278) were, on average, aged 52 years, 38% female, and 69% white. Of these, 79% endorsed discussing screening benefits as very important to SDM; 64% for discussing risks; and 31% for agreeing with patient’s opinion. PCPs were most likely to rate SDM as very important for colorectal cancer screening in adults aged 50–75 years (69%), and least likely for colorectal cancer screening in adults aged >85 years (34%). Regression results indicated the importance of PCPs’ having autonomous or self-determined reasons for engaging in SDM (e.g., believing in the benefits of SDM) (OR = 2.29, 95% CI, 1.87 to 2.79). PCPs’ support for SDM varied by USPSTF recommendation grade (overall contrast, X2 = 14.7; P = 0.0054), with support greatest for A-Grade recommendations. Support for SDM was lower in contexts where decisions pertained to not screening older patients (OR = 0.45, 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.56). Limitations. It is unknown whether PCPs’ perceptions of the importance of SDM behaviors differs with specific screening decisions or the potential limited ability to generalize findings. Conclusions. Our results highlight the need to document SDM benefits and consider the specific contextual challenges, such as the level of uncertainty or whether evidence supports recommending/not recommending screening, when implementing SDM across an array of cancer screening contexts.

[1]  N. Bansback,et al.  Physician attitudes toward shared decision making: A systematic review. , 2015, Patient education and counseling.

[2]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Assessments of the extent to which health‐care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument , 2015, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[3]  Jennifer Elston Lafata,et al.  Where Is the Evidence? A Systematic Review of Shared Decision Making and Patient Outcomes , 2015, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[4]  Sarah E Lillie,et al.  Managed care patients' preferences, physician recommendations, and colon cancer screening. , 2014, The American journal of managed care.

[5]  A. Coulter,et al.  Core Competencies for Shared Decision Making Training Programs: Insights From an International, Interdisciplinary Working Group , 2013, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[6]  Mack T. Ruffin,et al.  What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening? , 2013, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  Peter H. Schwartz,et al.  Older adults and forgoing cancer screening: "I think it would be strange". , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[8]  R. Gomis,et al.  Epithelial-mesenchymal transition can suppress major attributes of human epithelial tumor-initiating cells. , 2012, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[9]  Russell E Glasgow,et al.  Primary Care Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendation Patterns , 2012, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[10]  M. Stefanek Uninformed compliance or informed choice? A needed shift in our approach to cancer screening. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  J. Kutner,et al.  Patient and Cardiologist Perceptions on Decision Making for Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators: A Qualitative Study , 2011, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[12]  F. Barg,et al.  Contrasting Parents' and Pediatricians' Perspectives on Shared Decision-Making in ADHD , 2011, Pediatrics.

[13]  Angela Fagerlin,et al.  Use of the Internet and Ratings of Information Sources for Medical Decisions: Results from the DECISIONS Survey , 2010, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[14]  S. Flocke,et al.  Inconsistencies in patient perceptions and observer ratings of shared decision making: the case of colorectal cancer screening. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[15]  P. Ubel,et al.  Deficits and Variations in Patients’ Experience with Making 9 Common Medical Decisions: The DECISIONS Survey , 2010, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[16]  France Légaré,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[17]  M. Gagnon,et al.  Competing Norms: Canadian Rural Family Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Shared Decisionmaking , 2008, Journal of health services research & policy.

[18]  T. Johnson,et al.  Methodologies for Improving Response Rates in Surveys of Physicians , 2007, Evaluation & the health professions.

[19]  P. Chisnall Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[20]  Robert A Smith,et al.  Cancer Screening in the United States, 2007: A Review of Current Guidelines, Practices, and Prospects , 2007, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[21]  Michael A Pickering,et al.  Validating the theoretical structure of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) across three different health behaviors. , 2006, Health education research.

[22]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Views of older adults on patient participation in medication-related decision making , 2006, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[23]  Gregory Makoul,et al.  An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[24]  R. Grol,et al.  GPs' views on involvement of older patients: an European qualitative study. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[25]  Katrina M. Krause,et al.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? , 2003, American journal of public health.

[26]  C. Charles,et al.  Shared treatment decision making: what does it mean to physicians? , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  A. Dunn,et al.  Physician-patient discussions of controversial cancer screening tests. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[28]  W. Levinson,et al.  Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. , 1999, JAMA.

[29]  R. Ryan,et al.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  S. Fedewa,et al.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening , 2015, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[31]  A. Fagerlin,et al.  Shared decision making: state of the science. , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[32]  I. Nyirjesy Enthusiasm for Cancer Screening in the United States , 2008 .

[33]  Stacey L Sheridan,et al.  Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[34]  G. Johnston,et al.  Applications of GEE Methodology Using the SAS System , 1997 .