High school students who use crack and other drugs.

BACKGROUND When it appeared in the 1980s, crack was thought to represent a completely new pathway of entry into drug use. Our objective was to identify the distinguishing characteristics of adolescents who have reached different stages of drug use, in particular the highest state represented by crack. METHODS Adolescents (N = 7611) representative of students in grades 7 to 12 from 53 New York state schools were classified in the following six mutually exclusive, cumulative categories of drug use: nonusers; alcohol and/or cigarette users only; marijuana users only; users of illicit drugs other than marijuana but neither cocaine nor crack; cocaine but not crack users; and crack users. The groups were compared in level of psychosocial functioning. RESULTS Students who use illicit drugs show deficits in school performance, quality of family relationships, and health and increased psychological symptoms. Compared with nonusers, they are more delinquent and more actively involved with their peers and live in social environments in which the perceived use of drugs by other adolescents and parents is more extensive. Delinquency and extent of perceived drug use consistently increase with each higher stage of use. Crack users exhibit the lowest level of psychosocial functioning of any drug-using group. CONCLUSIONS There are stage-specific characteristics and common characteristics (delinquent participation, peer drug use) throughout the developmental sequence of drug use. Despite declines over the last two decades in the prevalence of the use of different drugs, young people who use drugs display characteristics over historical time similar to those of young drug users 20 years ago.

[1]  L. Johnston,et al.  Smoking, drinking, and drug use among American high school students: correlates and trends, 1975-1979. , 1981, American journal of public health.

[2]  J. Block,et al.  Longitudinally foretelling drug usage in adolescence: early childhood personality and environmental precursors. , 1988, Child development.

[3]  D. Kandel,et al.  Stages of progression in drug involvement from adolescence to adulthood: further evidence for the gateway theory. , 1992, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[4]  H. B. Kaplan Deviant behavior in defense of self , 1980 .

[5]  J. Fagan,et al.  Social Processes of Initiation into Crack , 1991 .

[6]  Denise B. Kandel,et al.  Issues of Sequencing of Adolescent Drug Use and Other Problem Behaviors , 1989 .

[7]  Kandel Db Developmental stages in adolescent drug involvement. , 1980 .

[8]  R. Smart "Crack" cocaine use in Canada: a new epidemic? , 1988, American Journal of Epidemiology.

[9]  Smart Rg,et al.  Alcohol, cannabis, cocaine and other substance use among Ontario adults 1977-1987. , 1988 .

[10]  E. Wish,et al.  Detecting Predictors of Rare Events: Demographic, Family, and Personal Deviance as Predictors of Stages in the Progression Toward Narcotic Addiction , 1977 .

[11]  D. Kandel,et al.  Dropping out of high school and drug involvement. , 1988 .

[12]  R. Smart,et al.  Crack cocaine use: a review of prevalence and adverse effects. , 1991, The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse.

[13]  A. Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[14]  D. Kandel,et al.  From beer to crack: developmental patterns of drug involvement. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[15]  D. Kandel,et al.  The consequences in young adulthood of adolescent drug involvement. An overview. , 1986, Archives of general psychiatry.

[16]  D. Kandel,et al.  Sequence and stages in patterns of adolescent drug use. , 1975, Archives of general psychiatry.

[17]  L. Johnston Smoking, Drinking, and Illicit Drug Use among American Secondary School Students, College Students, and Young Adults, 1975-1991. Volume II: College Students and Young Adults. , 1992 .