Orientation-tuned suppression in binocular rivalry reveals general and specific components of rivalry suppression.

During binocular rivalry (BR), conflicting monocular images are alternately suppressed from awareness. During suppression of an image, contrast sensitivity for probes is reduced by approximately 0.3-0.5 log units relative to when the image is in perceptual dominance. Previous studies on rivalry suppression have led to controversies concerning the nature and extent of suppression during BR. We tested for feature-specific suppression using orthogonal rivaling gratings and measuring contrast sensitivity to small grating probes at a range of orientations in a 2AFC orientation discrimination task. Results indicate that suppression is not uniform across orientations: suppression was much greater for orientations close to that of the suppressed grating. The higher suppression was specific to a narrow range around the suppressed rival grating, with a tuning similar to V1 orientation bandwidths. A similar experiment tested for spatial frequency tuning and found that suppression was stronger for frequencies close to that of the suppressed grating. Interestingly, no tuned suppression was observed when a flicker-and-swap paradigm was used, suggesting that tuned suppression occurs only for lower-level, interocular rivalry. Together, the results suggest there are two components to rivalry suppression: a general feature-invariant component and an additional component specifically tuned to the rivaling features.

[1]  R. Blake.  A Neural Theory of Binocular Rivalry , 1989 .

[2]  David Alais,et al.  Independent Binocular Rivalry Processes for Motion and Form , 2006, Neuron.

[3]  R. L. Valois,et al.  The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[4]  Michael S. Loop,et al.  Visual suppression and its effect upon color and luminance sensitivity , 1994, Vision Research.

[5]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[6]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Adaptive center-surround interactions in human vision revealed during binocular rivalry , 2006, Vision Research.

[8]  R. Blake,et al.  Binocular rivalry suppression: insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change. , 1974, Vision research.

[9]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  Temporal frequency and contrast tagging bias the type of competition in interocular switch rivalry , 2007, Vision Research.

[10]  R. Blake,et al.  Rival ideas about binocular rivalry , 1999, Vision Research.

[11]  B. Julesz,et al.  Independent Spatial-Frequency-Tuned Channels in Binocular Fusion and Rivalry , 1975 .

[12]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Integration of motion information during binocular rivalry , 2002, Vision Research.

[13]  D. Levi,et al.  Color vision is altered during the suppression phase of binocular rivalry. , 1982, Science.

[14]  C. Clifford,et al.  Suppressed Patterns Alter Vision during Binocular Rivalry , 2005, Current Biology.

[15]  David Alais,et al.  Motion streaks in fast motion rivalry cause orientation-selective suppression. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[16]  S. Engel,et al.  Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation , 2001, Nature.

[17]  B Crassini,et al.  The Sensitivity of Binocular Rivalry Suppression to Changes in Orientation Assessed by Reaction-Time and Forced-Choice Techniques , 1981, Perception.

[18]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Center–surround inhibition deepens binocular rivalry suppression , 2005, Vision Research.

[19]  R. Fox,et al.  Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression , 1970 .

[20]  Alan W Freeman,et al.  Multistage model for binocular rivalry. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[22]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Orientation selectivity in cats and humans assessed by masking , 1985, Vision Research.

[23]  R. Blake,et al.  What is Suppressed during Binocular Rivalry? , 1980, Perception.

[24]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  P. Wenderoth,et al.  The depth and selectivity of suppression in binocular rivalry , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  R. Fox,et al.  Detection of motion during binocular rivalry suppression. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Stereoscopic Depth Perception , 1962 .

[30]  R. Fox,et al.  Independence between binocular rivalry suppression duration and magnitude of suppression. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[31]  Stephen A. Engel,et al.  Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation , 2001, Nature.

[32]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Contour, color and shape analysis beyond the striate cortex , 1985, Vision Research.

[33]  D. Alais,et al.  On Binocular Alternation , 2000, Perception.

[34]  Sheng He,et al.  Visible binocular beats from invisible monocular stimuli during binocular rivalry , 2000, Current Biology.

[35]  A. Sillito,et al.  Surround suppression in primate V1. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[37]  Charles Wheatstone.  On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. , 1962 .

[38]  N. Logothetis,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry , 1996 .

[39]  R. Desimone,et al.  Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[40]  H. Wilson,et al.  Modified line-element theory for spatial-frequency and width discrimination. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[41]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Neuron.

[42]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[43]  W. Levelt.  On binocular rivalry , 1965 .

[44]  R. Fox,et al.  Forced-choice form recognition during binocular rivalry , 1966 .

[45]  David Alais,et al.  Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity , 2007, Vision Research.

[46]  R. Blake.  © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 5 A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies , 2000 .

[47]  David Alais,et al.  Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways , 2003, Vision Research.

[48]  Georgios A. Keliris,et al.  A binocular rivalry study of motion perception in the human brain , 2005, Vision Research.

[49]  Sang-Hun Lee,et al.  Binocular battles on multiple fronts , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  Temporal aspects of spatial vision in the cat , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  Allison B. Sekuler,et al.  The effect of aging on the orientational selectivity of the human visual system , 2009, Vision Research.

[52]  D. Alais,et al.  Probing visual consciousness: rivalry between eyes and images. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[53]  Randolph Blake,et al.  The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual rivalry. , 2007, Journal of vision.