The role of sparsely distributed representations in familiarity recognition of verbal and olfactory materials

We present the generalized signal detection theory (GSDT), where familiarity is described by a sparse binomial distribution of binary node activity rather than by normal distribution of familiarity. Items are presented in a distributed representation, where each node receives either noise only, or signal and noise. An old response (i.e., a “yes” response) is made if at least one node receives signal plus noise that is larger than the activation threshold, and item variability is determined by the distribution of activated nodes as the threshold is varied. A distinct representation leads to better performance and a lower ratio of new to old item variability, than a more distributed and less distinct representations. Here we apply the GSDT to empirical data on verbal and olfactory memory and suggest that verbal memory relies on a distinct neural item representation, whereas olfactory memory has a fuzzy neural representation leading to poorer memory and inducing a larger ratio of new to old item variability.

[1]  A. Yonelinas,et al.  Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  G. Zucco,et al.  Anomalies in Cognition: Olfactory Memory , 2003 .

[3]  Barbara L. Chalfonte,et al.  Sum-Difference Theory of Remembering and Knowing : A Two-Dimensional Signal-Detection Model By : , 2004 .

[4]  W. Cain,et al.  Odor identification: perceptual and semantic dimensions. , 1998, Chemical senses.

[5]  W S Cain,et al.  Odor recognition: familiarity, identifiability, and encoding consistency. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  H. Lawless Chapter 4 – Olfactory Psychophysics , 1997 .

[7]  R. Doty,et al.  Development of the university of pennsylvania smell identification test: A standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function , 1984, Physiology & Behavior.

[8]  Mats J Olsson,et al.  Olfactory metacognition. , 2003, Chemical senses.

[9]  W S Cain,et al.  Switch and bait: probing the discriminative basis of odor identification via recognition memory. , 1996, Chemical senses.

[10]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. , 1999 .

[11]  J. Wixted Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[12]  John T Wixted,et al.  A direct test of the unequal-variance signal detection model of recognition memory , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Testing global memory models using ROC curves. , 1992, Psychological review.

[14]  James P. Egan,et al.  Recognition memory and the operating characteristic. , 1958 .

[15]  A. Yonelinas Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Matthew A Lambon Ralph,et al.  Classical anomia: a neuropsychological perspective on speech production , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[18]  L. T. DeCarlo Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. , 2002, Psychological review.

[19]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The multi-component model of working memory: Explorations in experimental cognitive psychology , 2006, Neuroscience.

[21]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[22]  A P Yonelinas,et al.  Consciousness, control, and confidence: the 3 Cs of recognition memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Murray Glanzer,et al.  Regularities of source recognition: ROC analysis. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  R. Doty,et al.  Internal consistency reliability of the fractionated and whole University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Christopher Miles,et al.  Serial position effects in recognition memory for odors: A reexamination , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Richard M Shiffrin,et al.  Efficiently measuring recognition performance with sparse data , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[27]  Jeffrey N Rouder,et al.  Latent mnemonic strengths are latent: A comment on Mickes, Wixted, and Wais (2007) , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  Anders Krogh,et al.  Introduction to the theory of neural computation , 1994, The advanced book program.

[29]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  Robert A Frank,et al.  Odor recognition memory as a function of odor-naming performance. , 2011, Chemical senses.

[31]  Lynne M Reder,et al.  Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process interpretation. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Joshua D Koen,et al.  Still no evidence for the encoding variability hypothesis: a reply to Jang, Mickes, and Wixted (2012) and Starns, Rotello, and Ratcliff (2012). , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Richard J. Stevenson,et al.  Phenomenal and access consciousness in olfaction , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[34]  M Treisman,et al.  A comparison of the encoding of content and order in olfactory memory and in memory for visually presented verbal materials. , 1997, British journal of psychology.

[35]  Bennet B. Murdock,et al.  Memory and the theory of signal detection. , 1970 .

[36]  L. Bäckman,et al.  Semantic activation and episodic odor recognition in young and older adults. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[37]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  The neuronal encoding of information in the brain , 2011, Progress in Neurobiology.

[38]  S. Sikström The variance theory of the mirror effect in recognition memory , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  Roderick Ashton,et al.  Sex differences in imagery vividness: An artifact of the test , 1980 .

[40]  J. Dunn Remember-know: a matter of confidence. , 2004, Psychological review.