Skin comfort of base layer knitted garments. Part 1: Description and evaluation of wearer test protocol

An important role of garments is to provide adequate comfort. A study was undertaken of the sensory scores for perceived comfort of wool base layer long sleeve knitted T shirts. This paper, the first in a series, describes and evaluates the wearer trial protocol in which untrained female wearers scored tactile, thermal, and moisture-based sensations during a controlled series of activities in a range of controlled climatic environments. Wearer scores were sufficiently consistent, that significant differences in aggregate scores between garments were detected that reflected changes in the fiber type (wool, cashmere, and cotton) and fiber specifications. Prickle and discomfort scores responded to different factors. The importance of choosing appropriate test conditions when assessing garments for particular end uses was highlighted as both the environment and activity affected wearer's perception of garment performance. A novel test feature was the use of a ‘link’ garment common to separate trials. This, combined with the observed absence of an effect due to garment washing, enabled the testing to be expanded so that 38 garments were successfully compared over 30 months in nine trials. Finally while the first trial used 43 wearers to obtain good estimates of absolute comfort levels, it was demonstrated that a reduction to 25 wearers was adequate for later trials with minimal loss in sensitivity.

[1]  Grs Naylor,et al.  Time of shearing and the diameter characteristics of fibre ends in the processed top: An opportunity for improved skin comfort in garments. , 1997 .

[2]  D. G. Phillips,et al.  Fabric-Evoked Prickle in Worsted Spun Single Jersey Fabrics Part III: Wear Trial Studies of Absolute Fabric Acceptability , 1997 .

[3]  F. S. Kilinc-Balci,et al.  Testing, analyzing and predicting the comfort properties of textiles , 2011 .

[4]  J. Stanton Wool and garment comfort , 2011 .

[5]  Guowen Song,et al.  Improving Comfort in Clothing , 2011 .

[6]  D. H. Tester Relationship between Comfort Meter values and the prickle rating of garments in wearer trials , 2010 .

[7]  C. M. Oldham,et al.  Shearing Time of Mediterranean Wools and Fabric Skin Comfort , 2004 .

[8]  Ludovic Koehl,et al.  Textile, Physiological, and Sensorial Parameters in Sock Comfort , 2010 .

[9]  R. J. Mayfield,et al.  Fabric-Evoked Prickle , 1992 .

[10]  Grs Naylor,et al.  The mechanics of fibre buckling in relation to fabric-evoked prickle. , 1992 .

[11]  Yi Li,et al.  Neural Network Predictions of Human Psychological Perceptions of Clothing Sensory Comfort , 2003 .

[12]  N. Hollies,et al.  Improved Comfort Polyester , 1984 .

[13]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  Statistical testing of individual differences in sensory profiling , 2003 .

[14]  Roger L. Barker,et al.  From fabric hand to thermal comfort: the evolving role of objective measurements in explaining human comfort response to textiles , 2002 .

[15]  Armand V. Cardello,et al.  Identification of the most significant comfort factors for textiles from processing mechanical, handfeel, fabric construction, and perceived tactile comfort data , 2013 .

[16]  John F. Fuzek Some factors affecting the comfort assessment of knit T-shirts , 1981 .

[17]  Ramasamy Alagirusamy,et al.  Science in Clothing Comfort , 2010 .

[18]  Yi Li,et al.  10 – Prediction of clothing sensory comfort , 2006 .

[19]  G. R. S. Naylor,et al.  Fabric-Evoked Prickle in Worsted Spun Single Jersey Fabrics Part II: The Role of Fiber Length, Yarn Count, and Fabric Cover Factor , 1997 .

[20]  R. Westerman,et al.  Identification of the physical stimulus and the neural basis of fabric-evoked prickle. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Roger L. Barker,et al.  Comfort Properties of Heat Resistant Protective Workwear in Varying Conditions of Physical Activity and Environment. Part II: Perceived Comfort Response to Garments and its Relationship to Fabric Properties , 2005 .

[22]  Maryam Naebe,et al.  Relationship between wearer prickle response with fibre and garment properties and Wool ComfortMeter assessment , 2013 .

[23]  Norman R. S. Hollies,et al.  A Human Perception Analysis Approach to Clothing Comfort , 1979 .

[24]  Grs Naylor,et al.  The relative importance of mean diameter and coefficient of variation of sale lots in determining the potential skin comfort of wool fabrics. , 1995 .

[25]  N. Hollies,et al.  Improved Comfort Polyester , 1984 .

[26]  Shinjung Yoo,et al.  Psychophysical determination of moisture perception in high-performance shirt fabrics in relationtosweating level , 2011 .

[27]  Tae Jin Kang,et al.  Effect of heat and moisture transfer properties on microclimate and subjective thermal comfort of caps , 2010 .

[28]  Per M. Brockhoff,et al.  Modelling individual differences between assessors in sensory evaluations , 1994 .

[29]  Tae Jin Kang,et al.  Thermal Comfort Properties of Wearing Caps from Various Textiles , 2009 .

[30]  G. R. S. Naylor,et al.  Fabric-evoked Prickle in Worsted Spun Single Jersey Fabrics Part 4: Extension from Wool to OptimTMfine Fiber , 2010 .

[31]  R. Postle,et al.  Evaluating Wool Shirt Comfort with Wear Trials and the Forearm Test , 2003 .

[32]  Grs Naylor,et al.  Fabric-Evoked Prickle in Worsted Spun Single Jersey Fabrics Part I: The Role of Fiber End Diameter Characteristics , 1997 .

[33]  A. K. Roy Choudhury,et al.  Factors affecting comfort: human physiology and the role of clothing , 2011 .

[34]  Grs Naylor,et al.  Knitted fabric made from 23.2um wool can be less prickly than fabric made from finer 21.5um wool. , 1992 .