Evolving conceptual spaces for symbol grounding in language games

Abstract A standard approach in the simulation of language evolution is the use of Language Games to model communicative interactions between intelligent agents. Usually, in such language games, an agent uses the results from its perceptual layer to categorize and to conceptualize world objects, a process named categorization. In this paper, we develop an approach to the categorization process, where the decomposition of reality in meaningful experiences is co-evolved with the lexicon formation in the language game. This approach brings some insights on how meaning might be assigned to symbols, in a dynamic and continuously changing environment being experienced by an agent. In order to do that, we use Barsalou’s notion of mental simulation and Gardenfors’ notion of conceptual spaces such that, together with ESOM neural networks, a cognitive architecture can be developed, where mental concepts formation and lexicon formation are able to co-evolve during a language game. The performance of our cognitive architecture is evaluated and the results show that the architecture is able to fulfill its semantics function, by allowing a population of agents to exchange the meaning of linguistic symbols during a naming game, without relying on “a priori” categorization scheme provided by an external expert or a set of examples for training a neural network in a previous discrimination game. These results, beyond bringing evidence on potential ways for symbols to get meaning on a biologically realistic way, open a set of possibilities for further uses of conceptual spaces on a much more complex problem: the grounding of a grammatical language.

[1]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Symbol grounding problem , 1990, Scholarpedia.

[2]  Luc Steels,et al.  Grounding symbols through evolutionary language games , 2002 .

[3]  John R. Searle,et al.  Minds, brains, and programs , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  A cognitive neuroscience perspective on embodied language for human–robot cooperation , 2010, Brain and Language.

[5]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Data clustering: a review , 1999, CSUR.

[6]  Christian Balkenius,et al.  The origin of symbols in the brain , 2000 .

[7]  P. Gärdenfors The Geometry of Meaning: Semantics Based on Conceptual Spaces , 2014 .

[8]  Michael L. Anderson Embodied Cognition: A field guide , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Conceptual spaces - the geometry of thought , 2000 .

[10]  Deb Roy,et al.  Semiotic schemas: A framework for grounding language in action and perception , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Rui Xu,et al.  Survey of clustering algorithms , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[12]  Ricardo Ribeiro Gudwin,et al.  A COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURE WITH INCREMENTAL LEVELS OF MACHINE CONSCIOUSNESS INSPIRED BY COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE , 2012 .

[13]  Remi van Trijp THE EMERGENCE OF SEMANTIC ROLES IN FLUID CONSTRUCTION GRAMMAR , 2008 .

[14]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  A Neurolinguistic Model of Grammatical Construction Processing , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Srinivas Narayanan,et al.  Moving Right Along: A Computational Model of Metaphoric Reasoning about Events , 1999, AAAI/IAAI.

[16]  T. Kohonen Self-organized formation of topographically correct feature maps , 1982 .

[17]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  Shweta Narayan,et al.  Simulated Action in an Embodied Construction Grammar , 2004 .

[19]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Linking Language with Embodied and Teleological Representations of Action for Humanoid Cognition , 2010, Front. Neurorobot..

[20]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Sentence Comprehension as Mental Simulation: An Information-Theoretic Perspective , 2011, Inf..

[21]  Alfredo PereiraJr Peter Gärdenfors, Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought , 2007 .

[22]  Luc Steels,et al.  Experiments in cultural language evolution , 2012 .

[23]  Christian Kroos Luc Steels (ed.). 2012. Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 2013 .

[24]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  An Embodied Model for Sensorimotor Grounding and Grounding Transfer: Experiments With Epigenetic Robots , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  Luc Steels,et al.  The Talking Heads experiment: Origins of words and meanings , 2015 .

[26]  Paul Vogt,et al.  The emergence of compositional structures in perceptually grounded language games , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[27]  G. Pezzulo,et al.  Computational explorations of perceptual symbol systems theory , 2011 .

[28]  Benjamin K. Bergen,et al.  ON THE EMERGENCE OF COMPOSITIONALITY , 2006 .

[29]  Nikola K. Kasabov,et al.  ESOM: an algorithm to evolve self-organizing maps from online data streams , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IJCNN 2000. Neural Computing: New Challenges and Perspectives for the New Millennium.

[30]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.