Exploring Stiffness Modulation in Prosthetic Hands and Its Perceived Function in Manipulation and Social Interaction

To physically interact with a rich variety of environments and to match situation-dependent requirements, humans adapt both the force and stiffness of their limbs. Reflecting this behavior in prostheses may promote a more natural and intuitive control and, consequently, improve prostheses acceptance in everyday life. This pilot study proposes a method to control a prosthetic robot hand and its impedance, and explores the utility of variable stiffness when performing activities of daily living and physical social interactions. The proposed method is capable of a simultaneous and proportional decoding of position and stiffness intentions from two surface electro-myographic sensors placed over a pair of antagonistic muscles. The feasibility of our approach is validated and compared to existing control modalities in a preliminary study involving one prosthesis user. The algorithm is implemented in a soft under-actuated prosthetic hand (SoftHand Pro). Then, we evaluate the usability of the proposed approach while executing a variety of tasks. Among these tasks, the user interacts with other 12 able-bodied subjects, whose experiences were also assessed. Several statistically significant aspects from the System Usability Scale indicate user's preference of variable stiffness control over low or high constant stiffness due to its reactivity and adaptability. Feedback reported by able-bodied subjects reveal a general tendency to favor soft interaction, i.e., low stiffness, which is perceived more human-like and comfortable. These combined results suggest the use of variable stiffness as a viable compromise between firm control and safe interaction which is worth investigating further.

[1]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  A synergy-driven approach to a myoelectric hand , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[2]  Marco Santello,et al.  Improving Fine Control of Grasping Force during Hand–Object Interactions for a Soft Synergy-Inspired Myoelectric Prosthetic Hand , 2018, Front. Neurorobot..

[3]  Toshio Tsuji,et al.  Bio-mimetic impedance control of an EMG-controlled prosthetic hand , 2000, Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No.00CH37113).

[4]  Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel,et al.  Towards resolving the co-existing impacts of multiple dynamic factors on the performance of EMG-pattern recognition based prostheses , 2019, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[5]  H. H. Sears,et al.  PROPORTIONAL MYOELECTRIC HAND CONTROL: AN EVALUATION , 1991, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[6]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  Independent control of joint stiffness in the framework of the equilibrium-point hypothesis , 1993, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  D. Atkins,et al.  Epidemiologic Overview of Individuals with Upper-Limb Loss and Their Reported Research Priorities , 1996 .

[9]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[10]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Identifying the role of proprioception in upper-limb prosthesis control: Studies on targeted motion , 2010, TAP.

[11]  J R Flanagan,et al.  The Role of Internal Models in Motion Planning and Control: Evidence from Grip Force Adjustments during Movements of Hand-Held Loads , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Adaptive synergies for the design and control of the Pisa/IIT SoftHand , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[13]  Nicola Vitiello,et al.  NEUROExos: A variable impedance powered elbow exoskeleton , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  D. Farina,et al.  Prosthetic Myoelectric Control Strategies: A Clinical Perspective , 2014, Current Surgery Reports.

[15]  C. Ghez,et al.  EMG patterns in antagonist muscles during isometric contraction in man: Relations to response dynamics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Dario Farina,et al.  A musculoskeletal model of human locomotion driven by a low dimensional set of impulsive excitation primitives , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[17]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Robot Collisions: A Survey on Detection, Isolation, and Identification , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[18]  Jonathon W. Sensinger,et al.  User-Modulated Impedance Control of a Prosthetic Elbow in Unconstrained, Perturbed Motion , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Toward Dexterous Manipulation With Augmented Adaptive Synergies: The Pisa/IIT SoftHand 2 , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[20]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Stiffness and position control of a prosthetic wrist by means of an EMG interface , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[21]  Kristin Østlie,et al.  Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[22]  Neville Hogan PROSTHESES SHOULD HAVE ADAPTIVELY CONTROLLABLE IMPEDANCE , 1983 .

[23]  O. Stavdahl,et al.  Control of Upper Limb Prostheses: Terminology and Proportional Myoelectric Control—A Review , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[25]  Paul L Gribble,et al.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Henriette Cramer,et al.  ‘Give me a hug’: the effects of touch and autonomy on people's responses to embodied social agents , 2009, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.

[27]  Hui Wang,et al.  Pattern recognition of electromyography signals based on novel time domain features for amputees' limb motion classification , 2017, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[28]  Domenico Prattichizzo,et al.  Grasp Stiffness Control in Robotic Hands Through Coordinated Optimization of Pose and Joint Stiffness , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[29]  D J Ostry,et al.  Compensation for interaction torques during single- and multijoint limb movement. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  N. Hogan Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[31]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Collision Detection and Safe Reaction with the DLR-III Lightweight Manipulator Arm , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[32]  Matteo Bianchi,et al.  The SoftHand Pro: Functional evaluation of a novel, flexible, and robust myoelectric prosthesis , 2018, PloS one.

[33]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  The Quest for Natural Machine Motion: An Open Platform to Fast-Prototyping Articulated Soft Robots , 2017, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[34]  D. Ostry,et al.  Independent coactivation of shoulder and elbow muscles , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Teleimpedance control of a synergy-driven anthropomorphic hand , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[36]  Monica Malvezzi,et al.  The Role of Closed-Loop Hand Control in Handshaking Interactions , 2019, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[37]  Dario Farina,et al.  The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[38]  A. G. Feldman Once More on the Equilibrium-Point Hypothesis (λ Model) for Motor Control , 1986 .

[39]  M. Latash,et al.  Testing hypotheses and the advancement of science: recent attempts to falsify the equilibrium point hypothesis , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Nicolas Y. Masse,et al.  Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm , 2012, Nature.

[41]  Agnes Roby-Brami,et al.  Upper-Limb Robotic Exoskeletons for Neurorehabilitation: A Review on Control Strategies , 2016, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Postural Hand Synergies for Tool Use , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Task-dependent impedance and implications for upper-limb prosthesis control , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[44]  Cosimo Della Santina,et al.  Design and Assessment of Control Maps for Multi-Channel sEMG-Driven Prostheses and Supernumerary Limbs , 2019, Front. Neurorobot..

[45]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[46]  Rieko Osu,et al.  Short- and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.