Secondary Failure of Metformin Monotherapy in Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE We sought to document the secondary failure rate of metformin monotherapy in a clinical practice setting and to explore factors that predict therapeutic failure. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We studied 1,799 type 2 diabetic patients who, between 2004 and 2006, lowered their A1C to <7% after initiating metformin monotherapy as their first-ever anti-hyperglycemic drug. We examined all A1C values recorded through 31 December 2008 (2–5 years of follow-up), defining secondary failure as a subsequent A1C ≥7.5% or the addition or substitution of another anti-hyperglycemic agent. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with the probability of secondary failure. RESULTS Of the 1,799 patients studied, 42% (n = 748) experienced secondary failure; the mean failure rate was 17% per year. However, patients who initiated metformin within 3 months of diabetes diagnosis failed at an age-and A1C-adjusted rate of 12.2% (10.5–14.4%) per year, and patients who initiated while A1C was <7% failed at an adjusted rate of 12.3% per year. An interaction term between duration of diagnosed diabetes and A1C was not significant. Age, duration, and A1C at initiation were the only factors that predicted secondary failure. CONCLUSIONS Although metformin failure may occur more rapidly in clinical practice than in clinical trails, initiating it soon after diabetes diagnosis and while A1C is low might preserve β-cell function, prolong the effectiveness of metformin, reduce lifetime glycemic burden, and prevent diabetes complications. Our findings support the current treatment algorithm for hyperglycemia management that recommends metformin initiation when diabetes is first diagnosed.

[1]  R. Holman,et al.  10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  B. Howard,et al.  Intensive Glycemic Control and the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: Implications of the ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VA Diabetes Trials , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[3]  G. Nichols,et al.  Treatment escalation and rise in HbA1c following successful initial metformin therapy. , 2006, Diabetes care.

[4]  M. S. Kirkman,et al.  Comment on: American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2011. Diabetes Care 2011;34(Suppl. 1):S11–S61 , 2011 .

[5]  C. Snehalatha,et al.  The Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1) , 2006, Diabetologia.

[6]  A. Classification,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2009 , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[7]  R. Grant,et al.  Clinical Predictors of Disease Progression and Medication Initiation in Untreated Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and A 1 C < 7 % , 2007 .

[8]  R. DeFronzo,et al.  Efficacy of metformin in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Multicenter Metformin Study Group. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  R. Holman,et al.  Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. , 1999, JAMA.

[10]  B. Zinman,et al.  Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  J. Meigs,et al.  Relationship Between Patient Medication Adherence and Subsequent Clinical Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Glycemic Management , 2007 .

[12]  D. Nathan Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of Therapy: A Consensus Statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[13]  S. Fowler,et al.  Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. , 2002 .

[14]  Rury R. Holman,et al.  Glycemic Control with Diet, Sulfonylurea, Metformin, or Insulin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Progressive Requirement for Multiple Therapies (UKPDS 49) , 1999 .

[15]  G. Nichols,et al.  The burden of treatment failure in type 2 diabetes. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[16]  David M Kent,et al.  Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: the need for risk stratification. , 2007, JAMA.

[17]  V. Basevi Standards of medical care in diabetes--2007. , 2009, Diabetes care.

[18]  G. Nichols,et al.  Contemporary analysis of secondary failure of successful sulfonylurea therapy. , 2007, Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

[19]  T. Valle,et al.  Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.