Using Cognitive Dissonance to Encourage Water Conservation)

In a field experiment on water conservation, we aroused dissonance in patrons of the campus recreation facility by making them feel hypocritical about their showering habits. Using a 2 × 2 factorial design, we manipulated subjects “‘mindfulness” that they had sometimes wasted water while showering, and then varied whether they made a “public commitment” urging other people to take shorter showers. The “hypocrisy” condition-in which subjects made the public commitment after being reminded of their past behavior-was expected to be dissonance-arousing, thereby motivating subjects to increase their efforts to conserve water. The results were consistent with this reasoning. Compared to controls, subjects in the hypocrisy condition took significantly shorter showers. Subjects who were merely reminded that they had wasted water, or who only made the public commitment, did not take shorter showers than control subjects. The findings have implications for using cognitive dissonance as means of changing behavior in applied settings, especially those in which people already support the desired goal, but their behavior is not consistent with those beliefs.

[1]  E. Aronson The Return of the Repressed: Dissonance Theory Makes a Comeback , 1992 .

[2]  J. Freedman Long-term behavioral effects of cognitive dissonance. , 1965 .

[3]  E. Aronson,et al.  Opinion change in the advocate as a function of the persuasibility of his audience: a clarification of the meaning of dissonance. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  A. W. Wicker Attitudes Versus Actions: The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavioral Responses to Attitude Objects. , 1969 .

[5]  Aroldo Rodrígues,et al.  The theory of cognitive dissonance: a current perspective , 1970 .

[6]  E. Aronson,et al.  The Relative Effectiveness of Models and Prompts on Energy Conservation: A Field Experiment in a Shower Room , 1982 .

[7]  J. Cooper Reducing fears and increasing assertiveness: The role of dissonance reduction , 1980 .

[8]  J. Cooper,et al.  A New Look at Dissonance Theory , 1984 .

[9]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  Effect of the severity of threat on the devaluation of forbidden behavior. , 1963 .

[10]  R. A. Wicklund,et al.  Perspectives on cognitive dissonance , 1976 .

[11]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  Taking a Closer Look: Reasserting the Role of the Self-Concept in Dissonance Theory , 1992 .

[12]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance: A Current Perspective1 , 1969 .

[13]  E. Aronson,et al.  Using Social Cognition and Persuasion to Promote Energy Conservation: A Quasi‐Experiment , 1988 .

[14]  Pallak,et al.  Commitment and energy conservation , 1980 .

[15]  M. Pallak,et al.  Commitment and Voluntary Energy Conservation , 1976 .

[16]  J Cooper,et al.  Dissonance and the pill: an attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  L. Bickman Environmental attitudes and actions. , 1972, The Journal of social psychology.

[18]  Carrie B. Fried,et al.  Overcoming denial and increasing the intention to use condoms through the induction of hypocrisy. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[19]  L. Festinger,et al.  Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. , 2011, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[20]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .