Population requirement for primary knee replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES To determine the population requirement for total knee replacement (TKR) in England. METHODS Population-based study using an age/sex-stratified random sample of 28 080 individuals aged 35 yr and over. Incident disease was estimated from prevalence by statistical modelling. The New Zealand priority criteria for major joint replacement were used for case selection. RESULTS Patients with knee disease were less likely than those with equally severe hip disease to have been referred to a specialist, to have consulted an orthopaedic surgeon or to be on a waiting list for joint replacement. The estimated annual requirement of TKRs in England, based on New Zealand Scores alone, was 55,800 (95% CI 40 700-70,900), contrasting sharply with an annual provision of 29,300 actually observed. However, in contrast to previously reported hip replacement data, when patient willingness to undergo surgery was considered, this estimate decreased considerably. CONCLUSIONS There appears to be an underprovision of TKR in England. This may be due in part to differences in perception of disease severity and likely response to surgery between patients and general practitioners on one hand, and rheumatologists and orthopaedic surgeons on the other.

[1]  J. Donovan,et al.  Who should have priority for a knee joint replacement? , 2002, Rheumatology.

[2]  J. Nolan,et al.  Who gets priority? Waiting list assessment using a scoring system. , 2000, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[3]  L. Rushton,et al.  Private funding of elective hospital treatment in England and Wales, 1997-8: national survey , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  C. Moran,et al.  Total knee replacement: the joint of the decade , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  J. Donovan,et al.  Population requirement for primary hip-replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study , 1999, The Lancet.

[6]  H. Raspe,et al.  Knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis: effectiveness, practice variations, indications and possible determinants of utilization. , 1999, Rheumatology.

[7]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  S. Stulberg,et al.  Outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty in persons aged 80 years and older. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  M. Liang,et al.  Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery. , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[10]  A. Mordue,et al.  New Zealand priority criteria project , 1997, BMJ.

[11]  P A Dieppe,et al.  The Bristol 'OA500' study: progression of osteoarthritis (OA) over 3 years and the relationship between clinical and radiographic changes at the knee joint. , 1997, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[12]  D C Hadorn,et al.  The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview , 1997, BMJ.

[13]  M. Dougados,et al.  Radiological progression of hip osteoarthritis: definition, risk factors and correlations with clinical status. , 1996, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[14]  I. Pinder,et al.  Survivorship analysis of the Kinematic Stabilizer total knee replacement: a 10- to 14-year follow-up. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  C. Naylor,et al.  Primary hip and knee replacement surgery: Ontario criteria for case selection and surgical priority. , 1996, Quality in health care : QHC.

[16]  J. Donovan,et al.  Deprivation and cause specific morbidity: evidence from the Somerset and Avon survey of health , 1996, BMJ.

[17]  C. Palmer,et al.  Quality-of-life improvement compared after hip and knee replacement. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  M Hillman,et al.  Prevalence of knee problems in the population aged 55 years and over: identifying the need for knee arthroplasty , 1995, BMJ.

[19]  T. Peters,et al.  Achieving equal probability of selection under various random sampling strategies. , 1995, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[20]  R. Dittus,et al.  Patient outcomes following unicompartmental or bicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Variation in orthopedic surgeons' perceptions of the indications for and outcomes of knee replacement. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[22]  J. Neuhaus,et al.  Long-term physical functioning in persons with knee osteoarthritis from NHANES. I: Effects of comorbid medical conditions. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  R. Dittus,et al.  Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. , 1994, JAMA.

[24]  J. Fries,et al.  Arthritis and mortality in the epidemiological follow-up to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I. , 1994, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine.

[25]  P A Dieppe,et al.  Knee pain and disability in the community. , 1992, British journal of rheumatology.

[26]  E. Graves National Hospital Discharge Survey. , 1989, Vital and health statistics. Series 13, Data from the National Health Survey.

[27]  G. Scuderi**,et al.  Survivorship of cemented knee replacements. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[29]  J J Anderson,et al.  Factors associated with osteoarthritis of the knee in the first national Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HANES I). Evidence for an association with overweight, race, and physical demands of work. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[30]  M. Lequesne,et al.  Indexes of severity for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Validation--value in comparison with other assessment tests. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[31]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Estimating incidence from age-specific prevalence in glaucoma. , 1981, American journal of epidemiology.