Sources, uses, strengths and limitations of data collected in primary care in England.

In the UK, general practitioners are responsible for both providing primary care services and for organising referrals for specialist care. Consequently, the medical records held by general practitioners include details of all diagnoses and prescribed drugs, in many cases extending from birth. In an increasing number of general practices, these records are held in electronic format and are potentially available for extraction and analysis. Electronic data from general practice therefore offer unique opportunities to plan and monitor health services, measure the quality of care provided by the National Health Service, and undertake population-based research.

[1]  A. Majeed,et al.  Workload implications of identifying patients with ischaemic heart disease in primary care: population-based study. , 2003, Journal of public health medicine.

[2]  A. Majeed,et al.  Prevalence and management of coronary heart disease in primary care: population-based cross-sectional study using a disease register. , 2003, Journal of public health medicine.

[3]  B. Sibbald,et al.  Attitudes to the public release of comparative information on the quality of general practice care: qualitative study , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  D. Skegg,et al.  Oral contraceptives, venous thromboembolism, and the courts , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  J. Hippisley-Cox,et al.  A comparison of research general practices and their patients with other practices--a cross-sectional survey in Trent. , 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[6]  A. Majeed,et al.  Prescribing indicators and their use by primary care groups to influence prescribing , 2002, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[7]  B. Starfield,et al.  Primary care, self-rated health, and reductions in social disparities in health. , 2002, Health services research.

[8]  A Majeed,et al.  Trends in the prevalence and management of atrial fibrillation in general practice in England and Wales, 1994–1998: analysis of data from the general practice research database , 2001, Heart.

[9]  J. Hippisley-Cox,et al.  Do single handed practices offer poorer care? Cross sectional survey of processes and outcomes , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  J. Hippisley-Cox,et al.  General practice workload implications of the national service framework for coronary heart disease: cross sectional survey , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  K Khunti,et al.  Features of primary care associated with variations in process and outcome of care of people with diabetes. , 2001, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[12]  S J Pocock,et al.  Randomized trials or observational tribulations? , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  Overcoming the constraints to becoming paperless. , 2000, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[14]  G M Leydon,et al.  Validation of the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in general practice database studies. , 2000, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[15]  R. Lawrenson,et al.  Clinical information for research; the use of general practice databases. , 1999, Journal of public health medicine.

[16]  C Bain,et al.  Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies , 1999, BMJ.

[17]  L. Smeeth,et al.  Tackling health inequalities in primary care , 1999, BMJ.

[18]  F. Destefano,et al.  Principles of epidemiological research on drug effects , 1999, The Lancet.

[19]  A. Majeed,et al.  What can PACT tell us about prescribing in general practice? , 1997, BMJ.

[20]  P Aveyard,et al.  Monitoring the performance of general practices. , 1997, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[21]  J. Hollowell,et al.  The General Practice Research Database: quality of morbidity data. , 1997, Population trends.