Gradient Projection, Constraints and Surface Regularization Methods in Adjoint Shape Optimization

This paper deals with the treatment of various problems that are present in adjoint-based shape optimization applications, in which a parameterization of the surface is absent. A general implicit smoothing algorithm is used to reduce high-frequency noise which might be present in the gradients that are calculated using a continuous adjoint solver. The implicit smoother allows the definition of patches on the shape that need to remain fixed during shape optimization and automatically secures surface gradient continuity between constrained and deformable patches. Along with the gradient smoothing, a surface mesh regularization algorithm is presented and used to support high-quality elements and mesh uniformity during each optimization step. In the end, the capability and the effectiveness of the method are demonstrated in various industrial test cases.

[1]  T. Rung Filtered Gradients for Adjoint-based Shape Optimisation , 2011 .

[2]  Caslav Ilic,et al.  Shape Gradients and their Smoothness for Practical Aerodynamic Design Optimization :Shape Gradients and their Smoothness for Practical Aerodynamic Design Optimization: , 2008 .

[3]  Eusebio Valero,et al.  Volumetric b-splines shape parametrization for aerodynamic shape design , 2014 .

[4]  Ilia Gherman,et al.  Preconditioning of One‐Shot Pseudo‐Timestepping Methods for Shape Optimization , 2005 .

[5]  Pavlos P. Alexias,et al.  SPHERICITY: MESH OPTIMIZATION FOR ARBITRARY ELEMENT TOPOLOGY , 2016 .

[6]  Mark Meyer,et al.  Harmonic coordinates for character articulation , 2007, SIGGRAPH 2007.

[7]  K. Giannakoglou,et al.  Continuous Adjoint Methods for Turbulent Flows, Applied to Shape and Topology Optimization: Industrial Applications , 2016 .

[8]  Li-Tien Cheng,et al.  Variational Problems and Partial Differential Equations on Implicit Surfaces: The Framework and Exam , 2000 .

[9]  S. Porziani,et al.  Aerodynamic Optimization of Car Shapes Using the Continuous Adjoint Method and an RBF Morpher , 2018, Computational Methods in Applied Sciences.

[10]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic design via control theory , 1988, J. Sci. Comput..

[11]  O. Pironneau On optimum design in fluid mechanics , 1974 .

[12]  Nikolaus A. Adams,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the DrivAer Model , 2012 .

[13]  Schumacher Thomas,et al.  Adjoint Optimization for Vehicle External Aerodynamics , 2016 .

[14]  J. Nocedal Updating Quasi-Newton Matrices With Limited Storage , 1980 .

[15]  A. Jameson Optimum aerodynamic design using CFD and control theory , 1995 .