In-situ CO2 capture in a pilot-scale fluidized-bed membrane reformer for ultra-pure hydrogen production

Abstract A novel pilot fluidized-bed membrane reformer (FBMR) with permselective palladium membranes was operated with a limestone sorbent to remove CO2 in-situ, thereby shifting the thermodynamic equilibrium to enhance pure hydrogen production. The reactor was fed with methane to fluidize a mixture of calcium oxide (CaO)/limestone (CaCO3) and a Ni-alumina catalyst. Experimental tests investigated the influence of limestone loading, total membrane area and natural gas feed rates. Hydrogen-permeate to feed methane molar ratios in excess of 1.9 were measured. This value could increase further if additional membrane area were installed or by purifying the reformer off-gas given its high hydrogen content, especially during the carbonation stages. A maximum of 0.19 mol of CO2 were adsorbed per mole of CaO during carbonation. For the conditions studied, the maximum carbon capture efficiency was 87%. The reformer operated for up to 30 min without releasing CO2 and for up to 240 min with some degree of CO2 capture. It was demonstrated that CO2 adsorption can significantly improve the productivity of the reforming process. In-situ CO2 capture enhanced the production of hydrogen whose purity exceeded 99.99%.

[1]  George Crabtree,et al.  The hydrogen economy , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[2]  Paul S. Fennell,et al.  The calcium looping cycle for large-scale CO2 capture , 2010 .

[3]  J. Grace,et al.  Sorption-enhanced steam reforming of methane in a fluidized bed reactor with dolomite as CO2-acceptor , 2006 .

[4]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming: II. Diffusional limitations and reactor simulation , 1989 .

[5]  John R. Grace,et al.  Sorbent-enhanced/membrane-assisted steam-methane reforming , 2008 .

[6]  E. Drioli,et al.  H2 for PEM-FC: effect of CO in the purification by means of Pd-based membranes , 2006 .

[7]  J.A.M. Kuipers,et al.  Design of a Novel Autothermal Membrane-Assisted Fluidized-Bed Reactor for the Production of Ultrapure Hydrogen from Methane , 2005 .

[8]  E. J. Anthony,et al.  Determination of intrinsic rate constants of the CaO–CO2 reaction , 2008 .

[9]  T. Boyd,et al.  Pure hydrogen generation in a fluidized-bed membrane reactor: Experimental findings , 2008 .

[10]  Wim G. Haije,et al.  Calcium oxide for CO2 capture: Operational window and efficiency penalty in sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming , 2009 .

[11]  N. P. Chizhevskii.  Iron and nitrogen , 1974 .

[12]  D. Harrison.  Sorption-Enhanced Hydrogen Production: A Review , 2008 .

[13]  John R. Grace,et al.  Equilibrium modelling of catalytic steam reforming of methane in membrane reactors with oxygen addition , 2001 .

[14]  John R. Grace,et al.  Comparison of fluidized bed flow regimes for steam methane reforming in membrane reactors: A simulation study , 2009 .

[15]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Hydrogen production from steam methane reforming coupled with in situ CO2 capture : Conceptual parametric study , 2005 .

[16]  John R. Grace,et al.  Cyclic CO2 capture by limestone‐derived sorbent during prolonged calcination/carbonation cycling , 2008 .

[17]  Hydrogen production and CO2 fixation by flue-gas treatment using methane tri-reforming or coke/coal gasification combined with lime carbonation , 2009 .

[18]  S. Kaliaguine,et al.  Morphological study of hydrogen permeable Pd membranes , 1994 .

[19]  Petter E. Røkke,et al.  Sorption-enhanced methane steam reforming in a circulating fluidized bed reactor system , 2009 .

[20]  John R. Grace,et al.  Hydrogen from an Internally Circulating Fluidized Bed Membrane Reactor , 2005 .

[21]  John R. Grace,et al.  Pure hydrogen generation in a fluidized bed membrane reactor: Application of the generalized comprehensive reactor model , 2009 .

[22]  Spyros Voutetakis,et al.  Autothermal sorption-enhanced steam reforming of bio-oil/biogas mixture and energy generation by fuel cells: Concept analysis and process simulation , 2006 .

[23]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming, methanation and water‐gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics , 1989 .

[24]  Wojciech M. Budzianowski,et al.  An oxy-fuel mass-recirculating process for H2 production with CO2 capture by autothermal catalytic oxyforming of methane , 2010 .

[25]  John R. Grace,et al.  Experimental studies of pure hydrogen production in a commercialized fluidized-bed membrane reactor with SMR and ATR catalysts , 2007 .

[26]  Said S.E.H. Elnashaie,et al.  Novel Circulating Fluidized-Bed Membrane Reformer Using Carbon Dioxide Sequestration , 2004 .

[27]  John R. Grace,et al.  Modeling of Sorption-Enhanced Steam Reforming in a Dual Fluidized Bubbling Bed Reactor , 2006 .

[28]  J. Satrio,et al.  Development of a Novel Combined Catalyst and Sorbent for Hydrocarbon Reforming , 2005 .

[29]  John R. Grace,et al.  The fluidized-bed membrane reactor for steam methane reforming: model verification and parametric study , 1997 .

[30]  Wang Lai Yoon,et al.  A simulation study for the hybrid reaction of methane steam reforming and in situ CO2 removal in a moving bed reactor of a catalyst admixed with a CaO-based CO2 acceptor for H2 production , 2006 .

[31]  Douglas P. Harrison,et al.  Calcium enhanced hydrogen production with CO2 capture , 2009 .

[32]  A. M. Adris,et al.  Fluidized-bed steam methane reforming with oxygen input , 1999 .

[33]  R. Steeneveldt,et al.  CO2 Capture and Storage: Closing the Knowing–Doing Gap , 2006 .

[34]  Bernard P. A. Grandjean,et al.  Structurally stable composite PdAg alloy membranes: Introduction of a diffusion barrier , 1996 .

[35]  L. Barelli,et al.  Hydrogen production through sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming and membrane technology : A review , 2008 .

[36]  H. Lasa,et al.  Novel Riser Simulator for methane reforming using high temperature membranes , 1999 .

[37]  Vincent G. Gomes,et al.  Steam reforming for hydrogen generation with in situ adsorptive separation , 2009 .

[38]  Wang Lai Yoon,et al.  Modeling and simulation for the methane steam reforming enhanced by in situ CO2 removal utilizing the CaO carbonation for H2 production , 2004 .

[39]  T. Wiltowski,et al.  SIMULTANEOUS PRODUCTION OF HIGH-PURITY HYDROGEN AND SEQUESTRATION-READY CO2 FROM SYNGAS , 2003 .

[40]  A. M. Adris,et al.  Modeling of Autothermal Steam Methane Reforming in a Fluidized Bed Membrane Reactor , 2002 .

[41]  Said S.E.H. Elnashaie,et al.  Modelling, Simulation and Optimization of Industrial Fixed Bed Catalytic Reactors , 1994 .

[42]  Kim Johnsen,et al.  Scale-up of CO2 capture processes: The role of Technology Qualification , 2009 .

[43]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Experimental study of a membrane assisted fluidized bed reactor for H2 production by steam reforming of CH4 , 2006 .