Information Exchange in Virtual Communities: A Comparative Study

Burnett's (2000) typology of information exchange in virtual communities attempts to provide a framework for examining the range of activities undertaken by participants in such communities. This study is the first in a series to apply the typology to specific virtual communities, in an effort to assess its accuracy against the day-to-day interactions to be found in two online communities. Through a comparison of these two communities using the typology, revisions to the typology are proposed which will allow it to reflect more accurately activities found within the communities. By providing a metric through which to address such questions, the revised typology will allow a richer understanding of virtual communities as social information environments.

[1]  J Lebow,et al.  Not just talk, maybe some risk: the therapeutic potentials and pitfalls of computer-mediated conversation. , 1998, Journal of marital and family therapy.

[2]  M. Feldman.  Munchausen by Internet: Detecting Factitious Illness and Crisis on the Internet , 2000, Southern medical journal.

[3]  Juris Dilevko,et al.  User preferences in the classification of electronic bookmarks: implications for a shared system , 2001 .

[4]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Information Seeking in Electronic Environments , 1995 .

[5]  Margaret McLaughlin,et al.  From terminal ineptitude to virtual sociopathy: how conduct is regulated on Usenet , 1998 .

[6]  Marc A. Smith.  Invisible Crowds in Cyberspace: Mapping the Social Structure of the Usenet , 1999 .

[7]  G. Riva,et al.  Computer-mediated communication: identity and social interaction in an electronic environment , 1998 .

[8]  E. Chatman,et al.  Small worlds: normative behavior in virtual communities and feminist bookselling , 2001 .

[9]  Gary Burnett,et al.  Information exchange in virtual communities: a typology , 2000, Inf. Res..

[10]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[11]  J. Finn,et al.  An exploration of helping processes in an online self-help group focusing on issues of disability. , 1999, Health & social work.

[12]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Empathic communities: balancing emotional and factual communication , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[13]  Tracy L. M. Kennedy.  An Exploratory Study of Feminist Experiences In Cyberspace , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[14]  Fay Sudweeks,et al.  Interactivity on the Nets , 1998 .

[15]  P. Klemm,et al.  Gender differences on Internet cancer support groups. , 1999, Computers in nursing.

[16]  V. Savicki,et al.  Gender Language Style and Group Composition in Internet Discussion Groups , 2006 .

[17]  B. Smit.  Chemie in cyberspace , 1999 .

[18]  Tim O'Shea,et al.  'Flaming' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. , 1992 .

[19]  Axel Schmetzke.  Disability-Related Resources on the Internet , 1996 .