Ensemble distribution models in conservation prioritization: from consensus predictions to consensus reserve networks

AIM Conservation planning exercises increasingly rely on species distributions predicted either from one particular statistical model or, more recently, from an ensemble of models (i.e. ensemble forecasting). However, it has not yet been explored how different ways of summarizing ensemble predictions affect conservation planning outcomes. We evaluate these effects and compare commonplace consensus methods, applied before the conservation prioritization phase, to a novel method that applies consensus after reserve selection. LOCATION Europe. METHODS We used an ensemble of predicted distributions of 146 Western Palaearctic bird species in alternative ways: four different consensus methods, as well as distributions discounted with variability, were used to produce inputs for spatial conservation prioritization. In addition, we developed and tested a novel method, in which we built 100 datasets by sampling the ensemble of predicted distributions, ran a conservation prioritization analysis on each of them and averaged the resulting priority ranks. We evaluated the conservation outcome against three controls: (i) a null control, based on random ranking of cells; (2) the reference solution, based on an expert-refined dataset; and (3) the independent solution, based on an independent dataset. RESULTS Networks based on predicted distributions were more representative of rare species than randomly selected networks. Alternative methods to summarize ensemble predictions differed in representativeness of resulting reserve networks. Our novel method resulted in better representation of rare species than pre-selection consensus methods. MAIN CONCLUSIONS Retaining information about the variation in the predicted distributions throughout the conservation prioritization seems to provide better results than summarizing the predictions before conservation prioritization. Our results highlight the need to understand and consider model-based uncertainty when using predicted distribution data in conservation prioritization.

[1]  D. White,et al.  Predicting climate‐induced range shifts: model differences and model reliability , 2006 .

[2]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Simulating the effects of using different types of species distribution data in reserve selection , 2008 .

[3]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Generalized models vs. classification tree analysis: Predicting spatial distributions of plant species at different scales , 2003 .

[4]  Jane Elith,et al.  Error and uncertainty in habitat models , 2006 .

[5]  L. Maiorano,et al.  Threats from Climate Change to Terrestrial Vertebrate Hotspots in Europe , 2013, PloS one.

[6]  F. Jiguet,et al.  The fate of European breeding birds under climate, land‐use and dispersal scenarios , 2012 .

[7]  S. Lek,et al.  Uncertainty in ensemble forecasting of species distribution , 2010 .

[8]  Á. Felicísimo,et al.  Do Stacked Species Distribution Models Reflect Altitudinal Diversity Patterns? , 2012, PloS one.

[9]  Jane Elith,et al.  Sensitivity of conservation planning to different approaches to using predicted species distribution data , 2005 .

[10]  F. Jiguet,et al.  How much do we overestimate future local extinction rates when restricting the range of occurrence data in climate suitability models , 2010 .

[11]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[12]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Site‐Selection Algorithms and Habitat Loss , 2003 .

[13]  Mathieu Marmion,et al.  Using summed individual species models and state-of-the-art modelling techniques to identify threatened plant species hotspots. , 2009 .

[14]  B. Erasmus,et al.  Ensemble models predict Important Bird Areas in southern Africa will become less effective for conserving endemic birds under climate change. , 2009 .

[15]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Selecting pseudo‐absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many? , 2012 .

[16]  T. Dawson,et al.  Model‐based uncertainty in species range prediction , 2006 .

[17]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[18]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Conservation planning under climate change : Toward accounting for uncertainty in predicted species distributions to increase confidence in conservation investments in space and time , 2011 .

[19]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Climate change threatens European conservation areas , 2011, Ecology letters.

[20]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Misleading results from conventional gap analysis – Messages from the warming north , 2011 .

[21]  S. Reddy,et al.  Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa , 2003 .

[22]  M. Araújo,et al.  BIOMOD – a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions , 2009 .

[23]  Mark New,et al.  Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  Mathieu Marmion,et al.  The performance of state-of-the-art modelling techniques depends on geographical distribution of species. , 2009 .

[25]  P. Rousseeuw.  Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[26]  S. Andelman,et al.  Protected area needs in a changing climate , 2007 .

[27]  W. Thuiller.  Patterns and uncertainties of species' range shifts under climate change , 2004 .

[28]  R. A. Garcia,et al.  Exploring consensus in 21st century projections of climatically suitable areas for African vertebrates , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[29]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritization , 2009 .

[30]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Making better biogeographical predictions of species’ distributions , 2006 .

[31]  A. Peterson,et al.  Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models , 2008 .

[32]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[33]  Olivier Arino,et al.  Global Land Cover Map for 2009 (GlobCover 2009) , 2012 .

[34]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[35]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[36]  Omri Allouche,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS) , 2006 .

[37]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2010 .

[38]  A. Peterson,et al.  New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Reserve Selection in Regions with Poor Biological Data , 2003 .

[40]  Damaris Zurell,et al.  The virtual ecologist approach: simulating data and observers , 2010 .

[41]  A. Prasad,et al.  Newer Classification and Regression Tree Techniques: Bagging and Random Forests for Ecological Prediction , 2006, Ecosystems.

[42]  J. Elith,et al.  Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models , 2009 .

[43]  Lucy Bastin,et al.  Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  Christina Gloeckner,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics With S , 2003 .

[45]  M. Araújo,et al.  Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change , 2005 .

[46]  Lucy Bastin,et al.  When do conservation planning methods deliver? Quantifying the consequences of uncertainty , 2009, Ecol. Informatics.

[47]  Jane Elith,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis for Regional‐Scale Reserve Selection , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[48]  W. Hagemeijer,et al.  The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds , 1997 .

[49]  Jeffrey R Dunk,et al.  Optimizing resiliency of reserve networks to climate change: multispecies conservation planning in the Pacific Northwest, USA , 2010 .

[50]  Mathieu Marmion,et al.  Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling , 2009 .