Anti-interleukin-6 Antibody Clazakizumab in Antibody-mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection: Effect on Donor-derived Cell-free DNA and C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 10

Background. Targeting interleukin-6 (IL-6) was shown to counteract donor-specific antibody production and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) activity. It is not known whether, or to what extent, IL-6 antagonism modulates biomarkers indicative of tissue damage (donor-derived cell-free DNA [dd-cfDNA]) and parenchymal inflammation (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand [CXCL] 10). Methods. We report a secondary endpoint analysis of a phase 2 trial of anti-IL-6 antibody clazakizumab in late AMR (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03444103). Twenty kidney transplant recipients were randomized to treatment with clazakizumab or placebo over 12 wk (part A), followed by an extension in which all recipients received clazakizumab through week 52 (part B). Biomarkers were evaluated at day 0 and after 12 and 52 wk, respectively. Results. Fractional dd-cfDNA (dd-cfDNA[%]) did not significantly change under clazakizumab, with no differences between study arms (clazakizumab versus placebo) at week 12 (1.65% [median; interquartile range: 0.91%–2.78%] versus 0.97% [0.56%–2.30%]; P = 0.25) and no significant decrease from weeks 12 to 52 (1.15% [0.70%–2.38%] versus 1.0% [0.61%–1.70%]; P = 0.25). Similarly, urine CXCL10 was not different between groups at week 12 (55.7 [41.0–91.4] versus 60.2 [48.8–208.7.0] pg/mg creatinine; P = 0.44) and did not change over part B (CXCL10 [pg/mg creatinine]: from 58 [46.3–93.1] to 67.4 [41.5–132.0] pg/mL creatinine; P = 0.95). Similar results were obtained for serum CXCL10. There was no association between biomarker levels and resolution of molecular and morphologic AMR activity. Conclusions. Our results suggest that IL-6 blockade does not significantly affect levels of dd-cfDNA[%] and CXCL10. Subtle responses to this therapeutic principle may be overlooked by early biomarker surveillance.

[1]  A. Heinzel,et al.  Levels of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA and chemokines in BK polyomavirus‐associated nephropathy , 2022, Clinical transplantation.

[2]  M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Combining Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Fraction and Quantity to Detect Kidney Transplant Rejection Using Molecular Diagnoses and Histology as Confirmation , 2022, Transplantation.

[3]  D. Brennan,et al.  Donor Derived Cell Free DNA in Kidney Transplantation: The Circa 2020–2021 Update , 2022, Transplant International.

[4]  K. Budde,et al.  Emerging drugs for antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: a focus on phase II & III trials , 2022, Expert opinion on emerging drugs.

[5]  M. Haas,et al.  Use of a donor‐derived cell‐free DNA assay to monitor treatment response in pediatric renal transplant recipients with allograft rejection , 2022, Pediatric transplantation.

[6]  M. Haas,et al.  Evaluation of Clazakizumab (Anti–Interleukin-6) in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Chronic Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection of Kidney Allografts , 2022, Kidney international reports.

[7]  Z. Demko,et al.  The Trifecta Study: Comparing Plasma Levels of Donor-derived Cell-Free DNA with the Molecular Phenotype of Kidney Transplant Biopsies , 2022, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[8]  L. Bu,et al.  Validation and clinical outcome in assessing donor-derived cell-free DNA monitoring insights of kidney allografts with longitudinal surveillance (ADMIRAL) study. , 2021, Kidney international.

[9]  K. Budde,et al.  Absolute or Relative Quantification of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Case Series , 2021, Transplantation direct.

[10]  S. Casas,et al.  Diagnostic value of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA to predict antibody‐mediated rejection in donor‐specific antibody‐positive renal allograft recipients , 2021, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[11]  K. Budde,et al.  Advantages of plasmatic CXCL-10 as a prognostic and diagnostic biomarker for the risk of rejection and subclinical rejection in kidney transplantation. , 2021, Clinical immunology.

[12]  P. Halloran,et al.  Correlation of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA With Histology and Molecular Diagnoses of Kidney Transplant Biopsies , 2021, Transplantation.

[13]  P. Walson,et al.  Liquid biopsies: donor-derived cell-free DNA for the detection of kidney allograft injury , 2021, Nature Reviews Nephrology.

[14]  K. Budde,et al.  Exploring the Complexity of Death-Censored Kidney Allograft Failure , 2021, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[15]  D. Brennan,et al.  Dynamic Response of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Following Treatment of Acute Rejection in Kidney Allografts. , 2021, Kidney360.

[16]  K. Budde,et al.  A Randomized Clinical Trial of Anti-IL-6 Antibody Clazakizumab in Late Antibody-Mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection. , 2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[17]  D. Brennan,et al.  Donor-derived Cell-free DNA and the Prediction of BK Virus-associated Nephropathy , 2020, Transplantation direct.

[18]  D. Wishart,et al.  Validity and utility of urinary CXCL10/Cr immune monitoring in pediatric kidney transplant recipients , 2020, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[19]  P. Marquet,et al.  Development and validation of an optimized integrative model using urinary chemokines for noninvasive diagnosis of acute allograft rejection , 2020, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[20]  H. Haslacher,et al.  Non-invasive Chemokine Detection: Improved Prediction of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Donor-Specific Antibody-Positive Renal Allograft Recipients , 2020, Frontiers in Medicine.

[21]  K. Hedman,et al.  Longitudinal assessment of the CXCL10 blood and urine concentration in kidney transplant recipients with BK polyomavirus replication—a retrospective study , 2020, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[22]  S. Chadban,et al.  Recommended Treatment for Antibody-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: The 2019 Expert Consensus From the Transplantion Society Working Group , 2019, Transplantation.

[23]  T. Friede,et al.  Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study , 2019, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[24]  P. Halloran,et al.  The therapeutic challenge of late antibody‐mediated kidney allograft rejection , 2019, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[25]  P. Nickerson,et al.  Multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol of urine CXCL10 monitoring strategy in kidney transplant recipients , 2019, BMJ Open.

[26]  K. Budde,et al.  Clazakizumab in late antibody-mediated rejection: study protocol of a randomized controlled pilot trial , 2019, Trials.

[27]  A. Loupy,et al.  Antibody-Mediated Rejection of Solid-Organ Allografts. , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  J. Sninsky,et al.  Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Identifies Antibody-mediated Rejection in Donor Specific Antibody Positive Kidney Transplant Recipients , 2018, Transplantation direct.

[29]  J. Pascual,et al.  Treatment of chronic antibody mediated rejection with intravenous immunoglobulins and rituximab: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double‐blind clinical trial , 2018, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[30]  M. Stegall,et al.  The Banff 2017 Kidney Meeting Report: Revised diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell–mediated rejection, antibody‐mediated rejection, and prospects for integrative endpoints for next‐generation clinical trials , 2018, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[31]  M. Posch,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Bortezomib in Late Antibody-Mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection. , 2017, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[32]  M. Naesens,et al.  Precision Transplant Medicine: Biomarkers to the Rescue. , 2017, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[33]  P. Nickerson,et al.  Urinary CXCL10 Chemokine Is Associated With Alloimmune and Virus Compartment-Specific Renal Allograft Inflammation , 2017, Transplantation.

[34]  K. Budde,et al.  Urinary miR‐155‐5p and CXCL10 as prognostic and predictive biomarkers of rejection, graft outcome and treatment response in kidney transplantation , 2017, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[35]  M. Haas,et al.  Assessment of Tocilizumab (Anti–Interleukin‐6 Receptor Monoclonal) as a Potential Treatment for Chronic Antibody‐Mediated Rejection and Transplant Glomerulopathy in HLA‐Sensitized Renal Allograft Recipients , 2017, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[36]  J. Sninsky,et al.  Cell-Free DNA and Active Rejection in Kidney Allografts. , 2017, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[37]  P. Halloran,et al.  Assessing rejection-related disease in kidney transplant biopsies based on archetypal analysis of molecular phenotypes. , 2017, JCI insight.

[38]  D. Brennan,et al.  Real Time Central Assessment of Kidney Transplant Indication Biopsies by Microarrays: The INTERCOMEX Study , 2017, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[39]  U. Christians,et al.  Barcelona Consensus on Biomarker-Based Immunosuppressive Drugs Management in Solid Organ Transplantation , 2016, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[40]  F. Terzi,et al.  Urinary C-X-C Motif Chemokine 10 Independently Improves the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Antibody-Mediated Kidney Allograft Rejection. , 2015, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[41]  E. Schwaiger,et al.  Complement Component C3 Activation: The Leading Cause of the Prozone Phenomenon Affecting HLA Antibody Detection on Single-Antigen Beads , 2014, Transplantation.

[42]  A. Kirk,et al.  Urinary Chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 Are Noninvasive Markers of Renal Allograft Rejection and BK Viral Infection , 2011, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[43]  P. Nickerson,et al.  Urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 Levels Correlate with the Extent of Subclinical Tubulitis , 2009, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[44]  F. Thaiss,et al.  Compartment-specific expression and function of the chemokine IP-10/CXCL10 in a model of renal endothelial microvascular injury. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.