Biomimetic Fiber-Reinforced Compound Materials

During the last years, many efforts have been made to transfer results of quantitative analyses of functional morphology and biomechanics in plants into technical applications. These attempts have been increasingly successful as is proven by the increasing number of biomimetic products on the market (e.g. paints based on the Lotuseffect® among many others, see Bar-Cohen (2006) and Masselter et al. (2010a)), of which the top 100 biomimetic products have generated about 1 billion Euros in 2005 to 2008 (Bushan, 2009). These successes are the result of the long period over which the form-structure-function relationships of the plants have been investigated and understood. Of the broad spectrum of biomimetic products, fiber-reinforced composites represent some of the most successful biomimetic technical applications. The potential of developing biomimetic fiber-reinforced compound materials is very high because 1) the fiber-matrix structure in plants is comparable to those in technical materials and 2) the complex fiber-matrix structures in plants are organized in at least five hierarchical levels (Masselter et al., 2009b, 2010a; Speck T. et al., 2007), from the molecular scale over the nanoscale and microscale to macroscale (Jeronimidis, 2000a). Quantitative analysis of this hierarchical structuring of plants is generally being increasingly recognized as one of the most important keys for understanding the form-structure-function relationships in plants (see Fratzl, 2007). This method allows interpreting and abstracting the interaction between the structural components in plants that possess different mechanical properties and in consequence, building a new generation of lightweight but stiff fiber-reinforced biomimetic compound materials (Masselter 2009b, 2010a,b; Speck, O. et al., 2005; Speck, T. et al., 2007; Speck, T. & Speck, O. 2008). In a biomimetic project, dealing with the development of fiber-reinforced compound materials the most important assets are the biological concept generators, which can be linear (unbranched) or branched, thereby mirroring the structures that are present in technics. Branched structures as Yand T-shaped branched components are very common in many fields of technical applications (Fig. 1). In plants, these branchings have to bear high static and dynamic loads that form a complex overlay of different loading modes: bending, compression-tension and torsion (Jeronimidis, 2000b). In technics, similar loads often drastically decrease the life time of a technical component causing wear and material fatigue

[1]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Structural and mechanical design of tissue interfaces in the giant reed Arundo donax , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[2]  R. Elbaum,et al.  The Role of Wheat Awns in the Seed Dispersal Unit , 2007, Science.

[3]  George Jeronimidis,et al.  Chapter 2 - Design and Function of Structural Biological Materials , 2000 .

[4]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Ontogenetic Reconstruction of the Carboniferous Seed Plant Lyginopteris oldhamia , 2006, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[5]  Hugh A. Bruck,et al.  The role of mechanics in biological and biologically inspired materials , 2002 .

[6]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Biomechanical analysis ofPitus dayi: Early seed plant vegetative morphology and its implications on growth habit , 1994, Journal of Plant Research.

[7]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Stiffness gradients in vascular bundles of the palm Washingtonia robusta , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  G. Jeronimidis MORPHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF WOOD FRACTURE , 1980 .

[9]  Peter Fratzl,et al.  The role of material properties for the mechanical adaptation at branch junctions , 2009, Trees.

[10]  Franka Brüchert,et al.  Biomechanics of the giant reed Arundo donax , 1997 .

[11]  Jörg Müssig,et al.  As tough as it is delicious? A mechanical and structural analysis of red rhubarb (Rheum rhabarbarum) , 2009 .

[12]  A. Emanns,et al.  The mechanical role of the endodermis in Equisetum plant stems. , 2004, American journal of botany.

[13]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Secondary Growth and Deformation of Stem Tissues in the Lower Carboniferous Seed Fern Calamopitys , 2009, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[14]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Biomechanics of plant growth forms: the trouble with fossil plants , 1998 .

[15]  A. Reiterer,et al.  Deformation and energy absorption of wood cell walls with different nanostructure under tensile loading , 2001 .

[16]  Andreas Bührig-Polaczek,et al.  Fruit Walls And Nut Shells As An Inspiration ForThe Design Of Bio-inspired Impact ResistantHierarchically Structured Materials , 2010 .

[17]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Insulation capability of the bark of trees with different fire adaptation , 2010 .

[18]  P. D. Mangalgiri Composite materials for aerospace applications , 1999 .

[19]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Biomimetic Fibre-reinforced CompositesInspired By Branched Plant Stems , 2010 .

[20]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Pummelos as Concept Generators for Biomimetically Inspired Low Weight Structures with Excellent Damping Properties , 2010 .

[21]  Peter Fratzl,et al.  Biomimetic materials research: what can we really learn from nature's structural materials? , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[22]  George Jeronimidis,et al.  Stress generation in the tension wood of poplar is based on the lateral swelling power of the G-layer. , 2008, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[23]  Peter Fratzl,et al.  Characterising natural fibre composites with hierarchical structure , 2002 .

[24]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Impact resistance of hierarchically structured fruit walls and nut shells in view of biomimetic applications , 2009 .

[25]  George Jeronimidis,et al.  Chapter 1 - Structure-Property Relationships in Biological Materials , 2000 .

[26]  Gottfried W. Ehrenstein,et al.  Faserverbund-Kunststoffe: Werkstoffe - Verarbeitung - Eigenschaften , 2006 .

[27]  George Jeronimidis,et al.  Composites with high work of fracture , 1980, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[28]  T Speck,et al.  Biomechanics and functional anatomy of hollow-stemmed sphenopsids. I. Equisetum giganteum (Equisetaceae). , 1998, American journal of botany.

[29]  Yoseph Bar-Cohen,et al.  Biomimetics : Biologically Inspired Technologies , 2011 .

[30]  Peter Fratzl,et al.  Cellulose fibrils direct plant organ movements. , 2008, Faraday discussions.

[31]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Modelling primary and secondary growth processes in plants: a summary of the methodology and new data from an early lignophyte. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[32]  T Speck,et al.  Brittleness of twig bases in the genus Salix: fracture mechanics and ecological relevance. , 2000, Journal of experimental botany.

[33]  Olga Speck,et al.  Damped oscillations of the giant reed Arundo donax (Poaceae). , 2004, American journal of botany.

[34]  Minoru Taya,et al.  What can we learn from nastic plant structures? The phytomimetic potentiality of nastic structures , 2006, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[35]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Process Sequences In Biomimetic Research , 2008 .

[36]  G Jeronimidis,et al.  Wood, one of nature's challenging composites. , 1980, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[37]  S. Stanzl-Tschegg,et al.  Variation of cellulose microfibril angles in softwoods and hardwoods-a possible strategy of mechanical optimization. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[38]  Jan Knippers,et al.  Biomimetic Deployable Systems in Architecture , 2010 .

[39]  C. Dawson,et al.  How pine cones open , 1997, Nature.

[40]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Fruit Walls And Nut Shells As An Inspiration For The Design Of Bio-inspired Impact-resistant Hierarchically Structured Materials , 2013 .

[41]  G. Jeronimidis,et al.  The fracture behaviour of wood and the relations between toughness and morphology , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[42]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Biomechanical Reconstruction of the Carboniferous Seed Fern Lyginopteris oldhamia: Implications for Growth Form Reconstruction and Habit , 2007, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[43]  Jan Knippers,et al.  Plant movements as concept generators for deployable systems in architecture , 2010 .

[44]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Bio-inspired Solutions For TechnicalProblems: Biomimetic Cable Entries AndShock-absorbing Pallets , 2008 .

[45]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Biomimetics and technical textiles: solving engineering problems with the help of nature's wisdom. , 2006, American journal of botany.

[46]  Ye Zhang,et al.  Fatigue Behaviour of Adhesively Bonded Pultruded Gfrp , 2007 .

[47]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Principles of Branching Morphology and Anatomy in Arborescent Monocotyledons and Columnar Cacti as Concept Generators for Branched Fiber‐Reinforced Composites , 2010 .

[48]  Peter Fratzl Von Knochen, Holz und Zähnen , 2002 .

[49]  C. Mattheck,et al.  Engineering Components grow like trees , 1990 .

[50]  I. Burgert,et al.  Actuation systems in plants as prototypes for bioinspired devices , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[51]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Structure-function relationships of different vascular bundle types in the stem of the Mexican fanpalm (Washingtonia robusta). , 2009, The New phytologist.

[52]  Anne George,et al.  Advances in Biomimetics , 2011 .