Degradation of Toluene, Xylene, and Trimethylbenzene Vapors by Biofiltration: A Comparison

Abstract This paper presents a comparative study of the biodegradation of three aromatic volatile compounds in a compost-based biofilter: toluene, xylene, and 1,2,4-trimethyl-benzene, used in the course of this work for the first time in the field of biofiltration. Hence, three identical biofiltration units have been operated at the laboratory scale. During the experiments, nitrogen (as urea) was supplied at various concentrations to each reactor, via irrigated nutrient solutions. A comparative analysis of the results showed that the biodegradability scale followed the degree of substitution around the aromatic ring: toluene > xylene > trimethylbenzene, with 95, 80, and 70% maximum conversions, respectively. In addition, and despite the different removal levels achieved in the three biore-actors, it was established that from a reaction viewpoint, the degradation of the three compounds seemed to follow similar metabolic pathways involving methylcatechol isomers. Finally, by varying the nitrogen input concentrations in the three reactors, three degradation regimes have been highlighted: an N-limitation regime and an N-optimum regime, common to the three solvents, and an N-excess regime, favorable to the colonization of the filter beds by nitrifying species, which particularly affected the xylene and trimethylbenzene biodegradation.

[1]  A. M. Gerrard,et al.  Modelling shock loadings and starvation in the biofiltration of toluene and xylene , 2001 .

[2]  C. Tseng,et al.  Biological elimination of H2S and NH3 from wastegases by biofilter packed with immobilized heterotrophic bacteria. , 2001, Chemosphere.

[3]  R. Amal,et al.  Effect of inlet mass loading, water and total bacteria count on methanol elimination using upward flow and downward flow biofilters , 2000 .

[4]  M. Heitz,et al.  Treatment of Air Polluted with Xylenes using a Biofilter Reactor , 2000 .

[5]  Y. Oh,et al.  Selection of Suitable Packing Material for Biofiltration of Toluene, m- and p-Xylene Vapors , 2000 .

[6]  A. M. Gerrard,et al.  Dynamic responses of biofilters to changes in the operating conditions in the process of removing toluene and xylene from air , 2000 .

[7]  Mario Schirmer,et al.  A relative-least-squares technique to determine unique Monod kinetic parameters of BTEX compounds using batch experiments , 1999 .

[8]  Ryszard Brzezinski,et al.  Treatment of air polluted with high concentrations of toluene and xylene in a pilot-scale biofilter , 1998 .

[9]  M. Deshusses,et al.  Biofiltration for air pollution control , 1998 .

[10]  R. Loehr,et al.  Effect of Media Nitrogen Concentration on Biofilter Performance. , 1998, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[11]  Y. Oh,et al.  Construction of a bacterial consortium for the biofiltration of benzene, toluene and xylene emissions , 1997 .

[12]  S. Møller,et al.  Activity of Toluene-degrading Pseudomonas putida in the early growth phase of a biofilm for waste gas treatment. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  A. Venosa,et al.  Selective enumeration of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbon degrading bacteria by a most-probable-number procedure. , 1996, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[14]  Zarook Shareefdeen,et al.  Biofiltration of toluene vapor under steady-state and transient conditions: Theory and experimental results , 1994 .

[15]  Rmm Rob Diks The removal of dichloromethane from waste gases in a biological trickling filter , 1992 .

[16]  S.P.P. Ottengraf,et al.  Biological elimination of volatile xenobiotic compounds in biofilters , 1986 .