The Income Digital Divide: Trends and Predictions for Levels of Internet Use

This article examines recent U.S. Census Bureau data to test the hypothesis that the diffusion of the Internet is becoming more rather than less polarized by family income in the United States. Using multiple logistic regression and other odds-based analyses to assess Internet access in the United States from 1997 to 2003, this analysis finds that the odds of access increased most rapidly for individuals at highest family income levels and most slowly for individuals with the lowest income levels. These differential rates of diffusion, combined with an overall slowing of the diffusion of Internet use since 2001, suggest that it may be 2009 before a majority of lowestincome Americans use the Internet. The slow diffusion among low-income groups is not apparent in comparable assessments of Internet diffusion in European countries.

[1]  John Keane Structural Transformations of the Public Sphere , 2020, The Information Society Reader.

[2]  M. Castells The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1999 .

[3]  M. Warschauer Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide , 2003 .

[4]  Kenneth Flamm,et al.  An analysis of the determinants of internet access , 2005 .

[5]  Robert H. Anderson,et al.  Universal Access to e‐mail: Feasibility and Societal Implications , 1995 .

[6]  Joo-Young Jung,et al.  Exploring the Digital Divide , 2001, Commun. Res..

[7]  R. Blendon,et al.  Health information, the Internet, and the digital divide. , 2000, Health affairs.

[8]  John P. Robinson,et al.  NEW SOCIAL SURVEY PERSPECTIVES ON THE DIGITAL DIVIDE , 2003 .

[9]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[10]  P. Allison Measures of Inequality , 1978 .

[11]  G. Firebaugh,et al.  Accounting for the Recent Decline in Global Income Inequality1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Ann E. Schlosser,et al.  The Evolution of the Digital Divide: How Gaps in Internet Access May Impact Electronic Commerce , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  Fernando De Maio,et al.  Income inequality measures , 2007 .

[14]  P. Norris Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2001 .

[15]  Jan van Dijk,et al.  The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[16]  Jorge Reina Schement,et al.  Of gaps by which democracy we measure , 2001 .

[17]  Jie Huang,et al.  Use of e-Health services between 1999 and 2002: a growing digital divide. , 2004, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[18]  Brenda White,et al.  DEPARTMENT OF LABOR , 2006 .

[19]  K. A. Hill,et al.  Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet , 1998 .

[20]  Christa Reiser,et al.  Social stratification and the digital divide , 2003 .

[21]  Erik P. Bucy,et al.  Social Access to the Internet , 1999 .

[22]  S. Korupp,et al.  Causes and Trends of the Digital Divide , 2005 .

[23]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Technology: The New Media in Society , 1986 .

[24]  B. Compaine The Digital Divide : Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth? , 2001 .

[25]  Jayajit Chakraborty,et al.  Measuring the Digital Divide in the United States: Race, Income, and Personal Computer Ownership , 2005 .

[26]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Social Implications of the Internet , 2001 .

[27]  Steven P. Martin IS THE DIGITAL DIVIDE REALLY CLOSING? A CRITIQUE OF INEQUALITY MEASUREMENT IN A NATION ONLINE , 2003 .