Whose Harm is it Anyway? Using Police Data to Represent Domestic Abuse Victims’ Experiences

There is a strong tradition of qualitative research documenting the experiences of survivors of domestic abuse. The in-depth nature of this data and the context in which it is collected contrasts with data collected by police officers largely for the purposes of recording and investigating crime. We argue that crime codes are an incomplete representation of ‘harm’ and escalation in domestic abuse. We also suggest harm indexes and severity scores that combine crime codes and sentencing data are an inadequate and potentially misleading representation of victim-survivors’ lived experiences and wider harms suffered. We caution against the use of harm index data to prioritize intervention in cases of domestic abuse and to assess police performance and the impact of interventions. We argue for a wider range of available data to be utilized in the measurement of harm and for measurement frameworks to be informed by foundational qualitative research in this field.

[1]  A. Myhill,et al.  The ‘officer effect’ in risk assessment for domestic abuse: Findings from a mixed methods study in England and Wales , 2023, European journal of criminology.

[2]  A. Myhill,et al.  ‘A genuine one usually sticks out a mile’: policing coercive control in England and Wales , 2022, Policing and Society.

[3]  Tom Kirchmaier,et al.  Comparing Conventional and Machine-Learning Approaches to Risk Assessment in Domestic Abuse Cases , 2020, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies.

[4]  L. Bates,et al.  No longer a civil matter? The design and use of protection orders for domestic violence in England and Wales , 2020, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law.

[5]  L. Humphreys,et al.  Putting Coercive Control into Practice: Problems and Possibilities , 2019, The British Journal of Criminology.

[6]  A. Myhill,et al.  Counting with understanding? What is at stake in debates on researching domestic violence , 2019, Criminology & Criminal Justice.

[7]  Meredith E. Bagwell-Gray Women’s Experiences of Sexual Violence in Intimate Relationships: Applying a New Taxonomy , 2019, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[8]  E. Katz Coercive Control, Domestic Violence, and a Five-Factor Framework: Five Factors That Influence Closeness, Distance, and Strain in Mother–Child Relationships , 2019, Violence against women.

[9]  M. Ashby Comparing methods for measuring crime harm/severity , 2018 .

[10]  A. Myhill,et al.  Practitioner (mis)understandings of coercive control in England and Wales , 2018 .

[11]  S. Walby,et al.  Untangling the concept of coercive control: Theorizing domestic violent crime , 2018 .

[12]  L. Sherman,et al.  Reducing the Harm of Intimate Partner Violence: Randomized Controlled Trial of the Hampshire Constabulary CARA Experiment , 2017 .

[13]  A. Myhill,et al.  The “Golden Thread”: Coercive Control and Risk Assessment for Domestic Violence , 2019, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[14]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  The Cambridge Crime Harm Index: Measuring Total Harm from Crime Based on Sentencing Guidelines , 2016 .

[15]  Torna Pitman Living with Coercive Control: Trapped within a Complex Web of Double Standards, Double Binds and Boundary Violations , 2016 .

[16]  A. Myhill,et al.  Police use of discretion in response to domestic violence , 2016 .

[17]  G. Feder,et al.  Help‐seeking amongst women survivors of domestic violence: a qualitative study of pathways towards formal and informal support , 2016, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[18]  B. Ariel,et al.  Targeting Escalation in Reported Domestic Abuse , 2015 .

[19]  L. Sherman,et al.  Tracking the Evidence for a ‘Mythical Number’: Do UK Domestic Abuse Victims Suffer an Average of 35 Assaults Before Someone Calls the Police? , 2014 .

[20]  E. Stark Do Violent Acts Equal Abuse? Resolving the Gender Parity/Asymmetry Dilemma , 2010 .

[21]  H. Douglas The Criminal Law's Response to Domestic Violence: What's Going On? , 2008 .