COSSMO: predicting competitive alternative splice site selection using deep learning

Motivation Alternative splice site selection is inherently competitive and the probability of a given splice site to be used also depends on the strength of neighboring sites. Here, we present a new model named the competitive splice site model (COSSMO), which explicitly accounts for these competitive effects and predicts the percent selected index (PSI) distribution over any number of putative splice sites. We model an alternative splicing event as the choice of a 3′ acceptor site conditional on a fixed upstream 5′ donor site or the choice of a 5′ donor site conditional on a fixed 3′ acceptor site. We build four different architectures that use convolutional layers, communication layers, long short‐term memory and residual networks, respectively, to learn relevant motifs from sequence alone. We also construct a new dataset from genome annotations and RNA‐Seq read data that we use to train our model. Results COSSMO is able to predict the most frequently used splice site with an accuracy of 70% on unseen test data, and achieve an R2 of 0.6 in modeling the PSI distribution. We visualize the motifs that COSSMO learns from sequence and show that COSSMO recognizes the consensus splice site sequences and many known splicing factors with high specificity. Availability and implementation Model predictions, our training dataset, and code are available from http://cossmo.genes.toronto.edu.

[1]  Brendan J. Frey,et al.  Bayesian prediction of tissue-regulated splicing using RNA sequence and cellular context , 2011, Bioinform..

[2]  Brendan J. Frey,et al.  Deep learning of the tissue-regulated splicing code , 2014, Bioinform..

[3]  Brendan J. Frey,et al.  A compendium of RNA-binding motifs for decoding gene regulation , 2013, Nature.

[4]  Bronwen L. Aken,et al.  GENCODE: The reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project , 2012, Genome research.

[5]  B. Frey,et al.  Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  Christopher B. Burge,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of short sequence motifs with applications to RNA splicing signals , 2003, RECOMB '03.

[7]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[8]  B. Frey,et al.  The human splicing code reveals new insights into the genetic determinants of disease , 2015, Science.

[9]  J. G. Patton,et al.  Cloning and characterization of PSF, a novel pre-mRNA splicing factor. , 1993, Genes & development.

[10]  Douglas G Scofield,et al.  Intron size, abundance, and distribution within untranslated regions of genes. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[11]  C. Burge,et al.  Splicing regulation: from a parts list of regulatory elements to an integrated splicing code. , 2008, RNA.

[12]  Rob Fergus,et al.  Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagation , 2016, NIPS.

[13]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Quantifying similarity between motifs , 2007, Genome Biology.

[14]  Anke Busch,et al.  Splicing predictions reliably classify different types of alternative splicing , 2015, RNA.

[15]  B. Frey,et al.  Probabilistic estimation of short sequence expression using RNA-Seq data and the “positional bootstrap” , 2016, bioRxiv.

[16]  Zefeng Wang,et al.  The splicing activator DAZAP1 integrates splicing control into MEK/Erk regulated cell proliferation and migration , 2014, Nature Communications.

[17]  Ellen T. Gelfand,et al.  The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[18]  David R. Kelley,et al.  Sequential regulatory activity prediction across chromosomes with convolutional neural networks. , 2018, Genome research.

[19]  M. Swanson,et al.  RNA mis-splicing in disease , 2015, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Long Short-Term Memory , 1997, Neural Computation.

[21]  M. Frilander,et al.  The significant other: splicing by the minor spliceosome , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA.

[22]  Michael Ruogu Zhang,et al.  Statistical features of human exons and their flanking regions. , 1998, Human molecular genetics.

[23]  L. Shkreta,et al.  hnRNP proteins and splicing control. , 2007, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[24]  Steven L Salzberg,et al.  HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements , 2015, Nature Methods.

[25]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Cloning and domain structure of the mammalian splicing factor U2AF , 1992, Nature.

[26]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.

[27]  M. Carmo-Fonseca,et al.  Deep intronic mutations and human disease , 2017, Human Genetics.

[28]  Xiaohui S. Xie,et al.  DanQ: a hybrid convolutional and recurrent deep neural network for quantifying the function of DNA sequences , 2015, bioRxiv.

[29]  Brendan J. Frey,et al.  Deciphering the splicing code , 2010, Nature.