Usability and Sociability in Online Communities: A Comparative Study of Knowledge Seeking and Contribution

Research Article The chief objective in many online communities is to allow for knowledge sharing and learning, which is enabled by technologies such as discussion forums. The value realized from these communities depends on ongoing participation in terms of two key activities i.e., knowledge seeking and contribution. However, a large number of communities fail, as they cannot sustain these activities. This poses the question of how these two activities can be simultaneously promoted. While previous research has separately explicated a number of different antecedents for the two activities, this study adopts a socio-technical perspective of an online community and considers usability and sociability as two salient antecedents applicable to both activities. Usability and sociability are multi-dimensional constructs, where individual's perceptions of the two may be determined by dimensions such as ease of use and social interactivity. This paper proposes that individuals may place different importance on these dimensions when seeking knowledge, compared to contributing knowledge. The research model is tested through a survey of users of a learning-focused community system. Our findings indicate that individuals do, indeed, differ in their emphasis on the identified dimensions when they engage in the two activities. Specifically, ease of use and system reliability are considered as more important for usability, and moderator perception as more important for sociability when individuals seek knowledge. On the other hand, individuals perceive tracking fulfillment as more important for usability and social interactivity as more important for sociability when they contribute knowledge. These differences have implications for future research and practice.

[1]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[2]  E. B. Andersen,et al.  Modern factor analysis , 1961 .

[3]  N. Rescher Introduction to Value Theory , 1969 .

[4]  William R. Darden,et al.  Causal Models in Marketing , 1980 .

[5]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[6]  William R. Darden,et al.  Causal Models in Marketing , 1980 .

[7]  Claes Fornell,et al.  A second generation of multivariate analysis , 1982 .

[8]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory , 1982 .

[9]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate data analysis with readings (2nd ed.) , 1986 .

[10]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[11]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[12]  E. Trist,et al.  The Social Engagement of Social Science: A Tavistock Anthology: Vol. 1: The Socio-Psychological Perspective. , 1991 .

[13]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Brian Shackel,et al.  Human factors for informatics usability , 1991 .

[15]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Interfaces for End-User Information Seeking , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[16]  H. Marsh Confirmatory factor analysis models of factorial invariance: A multifaceted approach , 1994 .

[17]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[18]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Solomon Cytrynbaum The Social Engagement of Social Science: A Tavistock Anthology—Vol. II: The Socio-Technical Perspective , 1995 .

[20]  H. Scarbrough,et al.  The Social Engagement of Social Science: A Tavistock Anthology , 1995 .

[21]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations , 1996 .

[22]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Connective and Communal Public Goods in Interactive Communication Systems , 1996 .

[23]  Fay Sudweeks,et al.  Networked Interactivity , 1997, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  Mark Sanderson,et al.  Information Seeking in Electronic Environment , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[25]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[26]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[27]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  Toward A Taxonomy of Multidimensional Constructs , 1998 .

[28]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Computer-Aided Systems and Communities: Mechanisms for Organizational Learning in Distributed Environments , 1998, MIS Q..

[29]  Fabio Paternò,et al.  Automatic Support for Usability Evaluation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[30]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[31]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  Towards a Methodology Employing Critical Parameters to Deliver Performance Improvements in Interactive Systems , 1999, INTERACT.

[32]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Designing web usability , 1999 .

[33]  Terri L. Griffith Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking , 1999 .

[34]  Colleen Cool,et al.  Ease of use versus user control: an evaluation of Web and non-Web interfaces of online databases , 2000, Online Inf. Rev..

[35]  James Boyle,et al.  Factors influencing the success of computer mediated communication (CMC) environments in university teaching: a review and case study , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[36]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects , 2000, MIS Q..

[37]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[38]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[40]  Katarina Stanoevska-Slabeva,et al.  A typology of online communities and community supporting platforms , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[41]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward A Theory of Knowledge Reuse : Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2022 .

[42]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[44]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Exploring Perceptions of Organizational Ownership of Information and Expertise , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[45]  S. Barab,et al.  Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum , 2001 .

[46]  A. Mattila,et al.  The Role of Emotions in Service Encounters , 2002 .

[47]  Ulrike Lechner,et al.  Social profiles of virtual communities , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[48]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[49]  Lourdes T. David Information seeking in an electronic environment - Module 3 , 2002 .

[50]  Jonas Löwgren,et al.  How far beyond human-computer interaction is interaction design? , 2002, Digit. Creativity.

[51]  R. Vandenberg Toward a Further Understanding of and Improvement in Measurement Invariance Methods and Procedures , 2002 .

[52]  Jonathan W. Palmer,et al.  Web Site Usability, Design, and Performance Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  A. MacCormack,et al.  Siemens ShareNet: Building a Knowledge Network , 2002 .

[54]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  The future of e-learning communities , 2002, CACM.

[55]  Stephanie Watts,et al.  Knowledge Adoption in Online Communities of Practice , 2003, ICIS.

[56]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[57]  Hong Xie,et al.  Supporting ease-of-use and user control: desired features and structure of Web-based online IR systems , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[58]  R. Kling,et al.  Group Behavior and Learning in Electronic Forums: A Sociotechnical Approach , 2003 .

[59]  Sehee Hong,et al.  Testing Configural, Metric, Scalar, and Latent Mean Invariance Across Genders in Sociotropy and Autonomy Using a Non-Western Sample , 2003 .

[60]  Bette Gray Informal Learning in an Online Community of Practice. , 2004 .

[61]  Robin Teigland,et al.  Collective Action and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Experiment 1 : Motivating Conversational Contributions Through Group Homogeneity and Individual Uniqueness , 2010 .

[63]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  A framework for analyzing and understanding online communities , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[64]  Mani Subramani,et al.  How Do Suppliers Benefit from Information Technology Use in Supply Chain Relationships? , 2004, MIS Q..

[65]  Richard Chamberlain,et al.  The Design of Online Learning Communities: Critical Issues , 2004 .

[66]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[67]  R. Kling,et al.  Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning: Group Behavior and Learning in Electronic Forums , 2004 .

[68]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[69]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  The Evolving Value of Foreign Partnerships in Transitioning Economies , 2005 .

[70]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  A Sender-Receiver Framework for Knowledge Transfer , 2005, MIS Q..

[71]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  Usability engineering methods for software developers , 2005, CACM.

[72]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[73]  Conan C. Albrecht,et al.  Motivating Content Contributions to Online Communities: Toward a More Comprehensive Theory , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[74]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community , 2005, TCHI.

[75]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Special Issue on: Knowledge Management in Asia Understanding Seeking from Electronic Knowledge Repositories: , 2022 .

[76]  Leila Alem,et al.  Design and evaluation of an online learning community: a case study at CSIRO , 2005, SIGG.

[77]  B. Gu,et al.  Competition among Virtual Communities and User Valuation : The Case of Investor Communities 1 , 2005 .

[78]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[79]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[80]  N. Noorderhaven,et al.  When Does Trust Matter to Alliance Performance , 2006 .

[81]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Online communities for teachers and lifelong learners: a framework for comparing similarities and identifying differences in communities of practice and communities of interest , 2006, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[82]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[83]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[84]  Naren B. Peddibhotla,et al.  Contributing to Public Document Repositories: A Critical Mass Theory Perspective , 2007 .

[85]  Wim Bouman,et al.  The Realm of Sociality: Notes on the Design of Social Software , 2007, ICIS.

[86]  Scott Wright,et al.  Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion forums , 2007, New Media Soc..

[87]  Rahul Roy,et al.  The Dynamics of Sustainability of Electronic Knowledge Repositories , 2007, ICIS.

[88]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[89]  Bin Gu,et al.  Competition Among Virtual Communities and User Valuation: The Case of Investing-Related Communities , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[90]  R. Luppicini Online learning communities , 2007 .

[91]  Peeter W. J. Verlegh,et al.  Satisfaction with Virtual Communities of Interest: Effect on Members' Visit Frequency , 2007 .

[92]  Jeroen Kraaijenbrink,et al.  Managing heterogeneous knowledge: a theory of external knowledge integration , 2008 .

[93]  Brian Shackel,et al.  Usability - Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation , 1991, Interact. Comput..

[94]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: a theoretical model and empirical exploration , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.