At-risk at the gate: prediction of study success of first-year science and engineering students in an open-admission university in Flanders—any incremental validity of study strategies?

Against the background of the increasing need for skilled scientists and engineers, the heterogeneous inflow of incoming students in science and engineering programs is particularly challenging in universities with an open-admission system. The prime objective of the present study is to determine the main academic and non-academic determinants of study success in a STEM study program in the largest university of Flanders (Belgium). The Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI), supplemented with additional background questions, was completed by 1521 first-year science and engineering students at the start of the academic year. To evaluate the incremental value of a particular predictor in explaining first-year GPA, a series of nested regression models were evaluated. Math level and math/science GPA in secondary school were strongly related to first-year GPA. Analysis of the LASSI questionnaire showed that students’ motivation/persistence, concentration, and time management skills at the start significantly influenced student achievement at the end of the first year, although the incremental value over prior achievement was small. Altogether, our results show that incoming students’ ability to regulate their study efforts has beneficial consequences in terms of achievement. Additionally, a negative recommendation by the secondary school teacher board was a clear indicator to identify at-risk students. In open-admission universities wherein new students cannot be formally denied access based on weak prior mathematics and science achievement, a focus on effort-related self-regulatory skills training (e.g., time management sessions) offers valuable opportunities for remedial interventions.

[1]  Reginald S. Lee,et al.  STEM Pathways: Examining Persistence in Rigorous Math and Science Course Taking , 2016 .

[2]  Gary D. Herrin,et al.  Is Modeling of Freshman Engineering Success Different from Modeling of Non‐Engineering Success? , 2008 .

[3]  Paul A. Westrick,et al.  Predicting student enrollment and persistence in college STEM fields using an expanded P-E fit framework: a large-scale multilevel study. , 2014, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  B. Zimmerman Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview , 2002 .

[5]  Dimitra Dodou,et al.  Predicting Academic Performance in Engineering Using High School Exam Scores , 2011 .

[6]  Barbara A. Greene Measuring Cognitive Engagement With Self-Report Scales: Reflections From Over 20 Years of Research , 2015 .

[7]  Maarten Pinxten,et al.  Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: effects of type of achievement measure. , 2010, The British journal of educational psychology.

[8]  B. French,et al.  An Examination of Indicators of Engineering Students' Success and Persistence , 2005 .

[9]  C. Abraham,et al.  Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  N. Kuncel,et al.  Study Habits, Skills, and Attitudes: The Third Pillar Supporting Collegiate Academic Performance , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[11]  Phillip L. Ackerman,et al.  Trait complex, cognitive ability, and domain knowledge predictors of baccalaureate success, STEM persistence, and gender differences. , 2013 .

[12]  Päivi Tynjälä,et al.  Factors related to study success in engineering education , 2005 .

[13]  Vincent Donche,et al.  Profiling First-Year Students in STEM Programs Based on Autonomous Motivation and Academic Self-Concept and Relationship with Academic Achievement , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  Elizabeth Litzler,et al.  Understanding the Risk of Attrition in Undergraduate Engineering: Results from the Project to Assess Climate in Engineering , 2012 .

[15]  Joos Vandewalle,et al.  Engineering and science positioning tests in Flanders: powerful predictors for study success? , 2015 .

[16]  Robert M. Gonyea Self‐reported data in institutional research: Review and recommendations , 2005 .

[17]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition , 1987 .

[18]  Jens Möller,et al.  Accuracy of teachers' judgments of students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis , 2012 .

[19]  Matthew W. Ohland,et al.  Identifying Factors Influencing Engineering Student Graduation: A Longitudinal and Cross‐Institutional Study , 2004 .

[20]  Joos Vandewalle,et al.  Engineering positioning test in Flanders : a powerful predictor for study success ? , 2014 .

[21]  Investigating Differences Between Low- and High-Stakes Test Performance on a General Education Exam , 2008 .

[22]  M. Segers,et al.  Factors affecting students' self-efficacy in higher education , 2011 .

[23]  Will Tyson,et al.  Modeling Engineering Degree Attainment Using High School and College Physics and Calculus Coursetaking and Achievement , 2011 .

[24]  Michael W. Matier,et al.  The role of ethnicity in choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions , 1996 .

[25]  Maarten Pinxten,et al.  ‘I choose so I am’: a logistic analysis of major selection in university and successful completion of the first year , 2015 .

[26]  S. Karau,et al.  Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students' academic motivation and achievement , 2009 .

[27]  Richard Sawyer,et al.  Predicting Engineering Major Status From Mathematics Achievement and Interest Congruence , 2004 .

[28]  D. James,et al.  Risk factors for poor performance on the undergraduate medical course: cohort study at Nottingham University , 2007, Medical education.

[29]  Brett D. Jones,et al.  An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First‐Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans , 2010 .

[30]  Michael R. Harwell,et al.  High School Mathematics Curricula, University Mathematics Placement Recommendations, and Student University Mathematics Performance , 2011 .

[31]  Kristy J. Lauver,et al.  Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  Mark I. McCarthy,et al.  The South Asian Genome , 2014, PloS one.

[33]  N. Purdie,et al.  Effects of Learning Skills Interventions on Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis , 1996 .

[34]  R. Zwick Rethinking the SAT: The Future of Standardized Testing in University Admissions , 2004 .

[35]  J. Burtner The Use of Discriminant Analysis to Investigate the Influence of Non‐Cognitive Factors on Engineering School Persistence , 2005 .

[36]  Jennifer G. Cromley,et al.  The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention , 2014 .

[37]  J. Möller,et al.  Teachers’ Judgments of Students’ Academic Achievement , 2014 .

[38]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[39]  Correlates of Engineering Freshman Academic Performance , 1996 .

[40]  Leonhard E. Bernold,et al.  Understanding Our Students: A Longitudinal‐Study of Success and Failure in Engineering With Implications for Increased Retention , 2007 .

[41]  Tinne De Laet,et al.  Fighting increasing drop-out rates in the STEM field: The European readySTEMgo Project , 2015 .

[42]  R. Dawes,et al.  Psychological Measurement , 2021, Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging.

[43]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Identifying Latent Variables Measured by the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) in Norwegian College Students , 1998 .

[44]  Carol Robinson,et al.  Engineering students—diagnostic testing and follow up , 2003 .

[45]  Jill E. Ellingson,et al.  Understanding Faking Behavior Through the Lens of Motivation: An Application of VIE Theory , 2011 .

[46]  Ronald G. Ehrenberg Analyzing the factors that influence persistence rates in STEM field, majors: Introduction to the symposium , 2010 .