Effect of different operating parameters on the recovery of proteins from casein whey using a rotating disc membrane ultrafiltration cell

Abstract In this study, effects of different operating parameters in ultrafiltration (UF) of casein whey in rotating disk ultrafiltration module, fitted with a 30 kD followed by a 5 kD molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) membrane have been analyzed and the benefits of membrane rotation with respect to stationary membrane module are highlighted. Prior to UF, centrifugation and microfiltration (MF) were carried out with the raw casein whey with an aim to remove the major membrane foulants like colloidal matters, suspended casein particles and lipid. The effects of pH, membrane rotation and transmembrane pressure (TMP) on UF flux and rejection were studied thoroughly, giving an emphasis on the effect of operating conditions in pressure and mass transfer controlled region as well. It was observed that solution pH was having a strong effect on UF flux and rejection for treating casein whey, which was explained in terms of prevailing monomer–dimer equilibrium of β-lactoglobulin, a major constituent of casein whey, as well as due to conformational changes of protein molecules with respect to isoelectric point. It was observed that for the 30 kD membrane, after 20 min of operation, 28.5% higher flux was obtained at pH 2.8 compared to pH 5.5 at a pressure of 490 kPa for stationary membrane, whereas the same figure for rotating membrane was 49.5%. Further, 38.7% higher UF flux at 300 rpm membrane speed compared to stationary membrane in 20 min of operation at pH 2.8 and TMP 490 kPa suggests the importance of shear across the membrane in minimizing the effects of concentration polarization. In the 5 kD membrane α-lactalbumin, which was mainly in the permeate stream from the 30 kD membrane, was separated from the other low molecular weight component of whey, such as lactose.

[1]  Siddhartha Datta,et al.  Studies on ultrafiltration of casein whey using a rotating disk module: effects of pH and membrane disk rotation , 2006 .

[2]  G. Belfort,et al.  Molecular interactions between proteins and synthetic membrane polymer films , 1995 .

[3]  H. Mckenzie,et al.  Effect of pH on β-Lactoglobulins , 1967, Nature.

[4]  A. Pihlajamäki,et al.  Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by simultaneous streaming potential and flux measurements , 1994 .

[5]  L. Ricq,et al.  Streaming potential and protein transmission ultrafiltration of single proteins and proteins in mixture: β-lactoglobulin and lysozyme , 1999 .

[6]  M. Wiesner,et al.  Particle fouling of a rotating membrane disk , 2000 .

[7]  H. D. de Jongh,et al.  Mild isolation procedure discloses new protein structural properties of beta-lactoglobulin. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  G W Smithers,et al.  New opportunities from the isolation and utilization of whey proteins. , 1996, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration: Principles and Applications , 1996 .

[10]  J. Boye,et al.  Effects of physicochemical factors on the secondary structure of β-lactoglobulin , 1996, Journal of Dairy Research.

[11]  Kenji Watanabe,et al.  Heat‐Induced Aggregation and Denaturation of Egg White Proteins in Acid Media , 2006 .

[12]  A. Fane,et al.  Ultrafiltration of protein solutions through partially permeable membranes — the effect of adsorption and solution environment , 1983 .

[13]  Wojciech Kujawski,et al.  Ethanol production from lactose in a fermentation/pervaporation system , 2007 .

[14]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  High-performance tangential flow filtration using charged membranes , 1999 .

[15]  G. Belfort,et al.  Do Denatured Proteins Behave Like Polymers , 1994 .

[16]  M. M. Bradford A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. , 1976, Analytical biochemistry.

[17]  M. Vitolo,et al.  Evaluation of cross-flow microfiltration membranes using a rotary disc-filter , 1998 .

[18]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  The effect of ph and ionic environment on the ultrafiltration of protein solutions with retentive membranes , 1983 .

[19]  A. Jönsson,et al.  Cell harvesting by cross‐flow microfiltration using a shear‐enhanced module , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  D. Haltrich,et al.  Production of a lactose-free galacto-oligosaccharide mixture by using selective enzymatic oxidation of lactose into lactobionic acid , 2001 .

[21]  R. Field,et al.  Transmission of bovine albumin under controlled flux ultrafiltration , 1999 .