Revisiting IMC based design of PI/PID controllers for FOPTD Models

This communication addresses the tuning of PI and PID controllers on the basis of the IMC approach. The tuning is based upon a first order plus time delay (FOPTD) model and aims to achieve a step response specification. It is analyzed that by using the IMC approach we get a PI or a PID depending on the kind of approximation used for the time delay term. This paper raises the question that the use of a PID instead of a PI controller should obey to another reason more related to the control objectives rather than the use of a better approximation for the time delay. An alternative tuning is presented that, even got within the IMC formulation is based on a min-max optimization. From the tuning rule provided by this approach the optimum settings from an integral squared error (ISE) criterion point of view are derived. The optimal controller results to be a PI controller. From this optimal controller as the starting point, the introduction of the derivative action can be seen as a detuning procedure that can increase the controller robustness. The approach provides further insight into the tuning of PI and PID controllers giving the (alternative) parameters a precise and engineering meaning.

[1]  K. L. Chien,et al.  On the Automatic Control of Generalized Passive Systems , 1952, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[2]  K.J. ÅSTRÖM,et al.  Design of PI Controllers based on Non-Convex Optimization , 1998, Autom..

[3]  C. Hang,et al.  Refinements of the Ziegler-Nichols tuning formula , 1991 .

[4]  Neil Genzlinger A. and Q , 2006 .

[5]  Ming-Tzu Ho,et al.  PID controller design for robust performance , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[6]  S. Skogestad Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning , 2004 .

[7]  M. Morari,et al.  Internal model control: PID controller design , 1986 .

[8]  Shankar P. Bhattacharyya,et al.  New results on the synthesis of PID controllers , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[9]  Hsueh-Chia Chang,et al.  A theoretical examination of closed-loop properties and tuning methods of single-loop PI controllers , 1987 .

[10]  R. Vilanova,et al.  PID controller tuning rules for robust step response of first-order-plus-dead-time models , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[11]  K. Åström,et al.  Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols step response method for PID control , 2004 .

[12]  R. Toscano A simple robust PI/PID controller design via numerical optimization approach , 2004 .

[13]  J. V. Vusse Plug-flow type reactor versus tank reactor , 1964 .

[14]  Ramon Vilanova,et al.  TUNING RELATIONS FOR ROBUST PID DESIGN BASED ON MIN MAX OPTIMIZATION , 2006 .

[15]  C. Kravaris,et al.  Nonlinear state feedback control of second-order nonminimum-phase nonlinear systems , 1990 .

[16]  Tong Heng Lee,et al.  PI Tuning in Terms of Gain and Phase Margins , 1998, Autom..

[17]  Evanghelos Zafiriou,et al.  Robust process control , 1987 .

[18]  J. G. Ziegler,et al.  Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers , 1942, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[19]  Sunwon Park,et al.  PID controller tuning for desired closed‐loop responses for SI/SO systems , 1998 .

[20]  N. Munro,et al.  PID controllers: recent tuning methods and design to specification , 2002 .

[21]  Min-Sen Chiu,et al.  Robust PID controller design via LMI approach , 2002 .