Happy Faces Elicit Heuristic Processing in a Televised Impression Formation Task: A Cognitive Tuning Account

Participants viewed a videotape of a person who expressed verbal statements accompanied by neutral, happy, or angry facial displays. These statements could be used to quickly stereotype the person (heuristic processing). Alternatively, these statements could be processed in a piecemeal manner for purposes of judging the person (systematic processing). Among low-motivation participants, neutral displays elicited systematic processing, whereas happy displays elicited heuristic processing. Angry displays elicited a processing style falling between these extremes. Highly motivated participants processed the verbal statements in a systematic manner regardless of the target's facial expression. These results correspond to findings reported in the mood literature, and the differences obtained for low- and high-motivation participants support a cognitive tuning account of the mediating process.

[1]  Kathleen M. McGraw,et al.  An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[2]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Mood management across affective states: the hedonic contingency hypothesis. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Algebra: Integration Theory Applied to Social Attribution1 , 1974 .

[4]  R. C. Sinclair,et al.  Mood and the Endorsement of Egalitarian Macrojustice Versus Equity-Based Microjustice Principles , 1991 .

[5]  Jacob Cohen.  Partialed products are interactions; partialed powers are curve components. , 1978 .

[6]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness , 1994 .

[7]  P. Ekman,et al.  The Duchenne smile: emotional expression and brain physiology. II. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Barbara Means,et al.  The influence of positive affect on decision-making strategy. , 1983 .

[9]  D. E. Bugental.  Interpretations of naturally occurring discrepancies between words and intonation: Modes of inconsistency resolution. , 1974 .

[10]  Patrick J. Stroh,et al.  On-line processing in candidate evaluation: The effects of issue order, issue importance, and sophistication , 1990 .

[11]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[12]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. , 1994 .

[13]  J. Kaswan,et al.  Perception of contradictory meanings conveyed by verbal and nonverbal channels. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  Invited article: Face, voice, and body in detecting deceit , 1991 .

[15]  Martin Fishbein,et al.  Basis for Decision: An Attitudinal Analysis of Voting Behavior1 , 1974 .

[16]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Happy and Mindless, But Sad and Smart? The Impact of Affective States on Analytic Reasoning , 1991 .

[17]  Melvin M. Mark,et al.  Color as an environmental processing cue: External affective cues can directly affect processing str , 1997 .

[18]  R J Melton,et al.  Image, issues, and ideology: the processing of information about political candidates. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Melvin M. Mark,et al.  The influence of mood state on judgment and action: Effects on persuasion, categorization, social justice, person perception, and judgmental accuracy , 1992 .

[20]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. , 1967, Journal of consulting psychology.

[21]  F. Strack,et al.  Mood and Persuasion , 1990 .

[22]  C. Whalen,et al.  Attributional antecedents of verbal and vocal assertiveness. , 1976 .

[23]  Paul Ekman,et al.  The effect of comparisons on detecting deceit , 1988 .

[24]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[25]  P. J. Conover,et al.  How People Organize the Political World: A Schematic Model , 1984 .

[26]  P. Ekman.  Facial expression and emotion. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[27]  G. Clore,et al.  Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. , 1994 .

[28]  Martin G. Evans,et al.  The problem of analyzing multiplicative composites: Interactions revisited. , 1991 .

[29]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Mood and Persuasion: Affective States Influence the Processing of Persuasive Communications , 1991 .

[30]  M. Lyons.  Presidential Character Revisited , 1997 .

[31]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood-Related Persuasion Depends on (Mis)Attributions , 1994 .

[32]  P. Ekman,et al.  Behavioral Markers and Recognizability of the Smile of Enjoyment , 1993 .

[33]  D. Apter,et al.  Ideology and discontent , 1966 .

[34]  A. J. Fridlund.  Human Facial Expression: An Evolutionary View , 1994 .

[35]  Leila T. Worth,et al.  Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[37]  R. Wyer,et al.  Mood as Input: People Have to Interpret the Motivational Implications of Their Moods Moods and Processing , 2022 .

[38]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .