Evaluating the applicability of socially-oriented perspectives to the IT service level agreement negotiation process: a theory-driven exploratory study

Continuing exponential growth in the Information Technology (IT) outsourcing market implies a need to understand the negotiated Service Level Agreements (SLAs) that underlie the majority of those sourcing relationships. Knowledge of the negotiation processes that are associated with the development of IT SLAs is a necessary precondition for designing and developing Negotiation Support Systems (NSSs) intended to support those processes. To gain such knowledge, it is first necessary to identify theoretical perspectives that may be relevant to the IT SLA negotiation process, postulate reasonable propositions therefrom, and then evaluate those propositions in a practical, exploratory fashion. Accordingly, the current paper draws on socially-oriented perspectives to develop theory-driven propositions which are then evaluated in an experimental setting. The results of this study indicate that several socially-oriented theories may be relevant to the IT SLA negotiation process, and represent a starting point for the identification of context-specific IT SLA negotiation support systems.

[1]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[2]  R. Gulati.  Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[3]  Barry Boehm,et al.  Comparing software system requirements negotiation patterns , 1999 .

[4]  J. Cross,et al.  Negotiation as a Learning Process , 1977 .

[5]  O. Bartos,et al.  Simple Model of Negotiation , 1977 .

[6]  Mark C. Paulk,et al.  The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process , 1994 .

[7]  Watts S. Humphrey,et al.  Managing the software process , 1989, The SEI series in software engineering.

[8]  L. Sanna.  Defensive pessimism, optimism, and simulating alternatives: some ups and downs of prefactual and counterfactual thinking. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Identifying Quality-Requirement Conflicts , 1996, IEEE Softw..

[10]  William L. Ury,et al.  Getting to Yes , 2019, Boy on the Bridge.

[11]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  A Theoretical Perspective of Negotiation Support Systems , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  T. Kern.  The Gestalt of an information technology outsourcing relationship: an exploratory analysis , 1997, ICIS '97.

[13]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Towards interest-based negotiation , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[14]  Geoff Easton,et al.  Industrial Networks: A New View of Reality , 1992 .

[15]  Nancy Cantor,et al.  Anticipatory and post hoc cushioning strategies: Optimism and defensive pessimism in “risky” situations , 1986, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[16]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Effect of Partnership Quality on IS Outsourcing Success: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Validation , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  M. Aiken,et al.  Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. , 1968 .

[18]  Marlene E. Burkhardt,et al.  SOCIAL INTERACTION EFFECTS FOLLOWING A TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE: A LONGITUDINAL INVESTIGATION , 1994 .

[19]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[20]  William N. Robinson,et al.  Supporting the negotiation life cycle , 1998, CACM.

[21]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Interest Alignment and Coalitions in Multiparty Negotiation , 1998 .

[22]  Michael Goul,et al.  A Vector Based, Content Analytic Methodology for Comparing Negotiated IT Service Level Agreements , 2005, AMCIS.

[23]  R. Fisher,et al.  Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in , 1981 .

[24]  Lawrence J. Prinzel,et al.  Examination of Automation-Induced Complacency and Individual Difference Variates , 2001 .

[25]  Simone Moran,et al.  When performance goals deter performance: Transfer of skills in integrative negotiations , 2004 .