How smart your smartphone is in lie detection?

Lying is a (practically) unavoidable component of our day to day interactions with other people, and it includes both oral and textual communications (e.g. text entered via smartphones). Detecting when a person is lying has important applications, especially with the ubiquity of messaging via smart-phones, coupled with rampant increases in (intentional) spread of mis-information today. In this paper, we design a technique to detect whether or not a person's textual inputs when typed via a smartphone indicate lying. To do so, first, we judiciously develop a smartphone based survey that guarantees any participant to provide a mix of true and false responses. While the participant is texting out responses to each question, the smartphone measures readings from its inbuilt inertial sensors, and then computes features like shaking, acceleration, tilt angle, typing speed etc. experienced by it. Subsequently, for each participant (47 in total), we glean the true and false responses using our own experiences with them, and also via informal discussions with each participant. By comparing the responses of each participant, along with the corresponding motion features computed by the smartphone, we implement several machine learning algorithms to detect when a participant is lying, and our accuracy is around 70% in the most stringent leave-one-out evaluation strategy. Later, utilizing findings of our analysis, we develop an architecture for real-time lie detection using smartphones. Yet another user evaluation of our lie detection system yields 84%-90% accuracy in detecting false responses.

[1]  Zhihong Zeng,et al.  A Survey of Affect Recognition Methods: Audio, Visual, and Spontaneous Expressions , 2009, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  J. A. Larson Modification of the Marston Deception Test , 1921 .

[3]  Pär Anders Granhag,et al.  The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts , 2005 .

[4]  Xueqi Cheng,et al.  Adaptive co-training SVM for sentiment classification on tweets , 2013, CIKM.

[5]  B. Depaulo,et al.  The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts: Discerning lies from truths: behavioural cues to deception and the indirect pathway of intuition , 2004 .

[6]  ByoungChul Ko,et al.  A Brief Review of Facial Emotion Recognition Based on Visual Information , 2018, Sensors.

[7]  Daniel Corstange,et al.  Sensitive Questions, Truthful Answers? Modeling the List Experiment with LISTIT , 2009, Political Analysis.

[8]  Zheng Lin,et al.  Language-independent sentiment classification using three common words , 2011, CIKM '11.

[9]  M. Sasikumar,et al.  Recognising Emotions from Keyboard Stroke Pattern , 2010 .

[10]  Paul Lukowicz,et al.  Can smartphones detect stress-related changes in the behaviour of individuals? , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops.

[11]  Alain Pruski,et al.  Emotion recognition for human-machine communication , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  P. Ekman,et al.  Facial action coding system: a technique for the measurement of facial movement , 1978 .

[13]  Ning Xu,et al.  Co-training and visualizing sentiment evolvement for tweet events , 2013, WWW '13 Companion.

[14]  Zheng Lin,et al.  Make It Possible: Multilingual Sentiment Analysis without Much Prior Knowledge , 2014, 2014 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT).

[15]  William G. Jacoby,et al.  A New Measure of Policy Spending Priorities in the American States , 2009, Political Analysis.

[16]  Von-Wun Soo,et al.  Towards Text-based Emotion Detection A Survey and Possible Improvements , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Information Management and Engineering.