Biomimetic Structures: Biological Implications of Dipeptide‐Substituted Polyphosphazene–Polyester Blend Nanofiber Matrices for Load‐Bearing Bone Regeneration

Successful bone regeneration benefits from three-dimensional (3D) bioresorbable scaffolds that mimic the hierarchical architecture and mechanical characteristics of native tissue extracellular matrix (ECM). A scaffold platform that integrates unique material chemistry with nanotopography while mimicking the 3D hierarchical bone architecture and bone mechanics is reported. A biocompatible dipeptide polyphosphazene-polyester blend is electrospun to produce fibers in the diameter range of 50–500 nm to emulate dimensions of collagen fibrils present in the natural bone ECM. Various electrospinning and process parameters are optimized to produce blend nanofibers with good uniformity, appropriate mechanical strength, and suitable porosity. Biomimetic 3D scaffolds are created by orienting blend nanofiber matrices in a concentric manner with an open central cavity to replicate bone marrow cavity, as well as the lamellar structure of bone. This biomimicry results in scaffold stress–strain curve similar to that of native bone with a compressive modulus in the mid-range of values for human trabecular bone. Blend nanofiber matrices support adhesion and proliferation of osteoblasts and show an elevated phenotype expression compared to polyester nanofibers. Furthermore, the 3D structure encourages osteoblast infiltration and ECM secretion, bridging the gaps of scaffold concentric walls during in vitro culture. The results also highlight the importance of in situ ECM secretion by cells in maintaining scaffold mechanical properties following scaffold degradation with time. This study for the first time demonstrates the feasibility of developing a mechanically competent nanofiber matrix via a biomimetic strategy and the advantages of polyphosphazene blends in promoting osteoblast phenotype progression for bone regeneration.

[1]  C. Laurencin,et al.  Polyphosphazene polymers for tissue engineering: an analysis of material synthesis, characterization and applications , 2010 .

[2]  Chad Johnson,et al.  The effect of scaffold degradation rate on three-dimensional cell growth and angiogenesis. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[3]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Miscibility and in vitro osteocompatibility of biodegradable blends of poly[(ethyl alanato) (p-phenyl phenoxy) phosphazene] and poly(lactic acid-glycolic acid). , 2008, Biomaterials.

[4]  C. Laurencin,et al.  Electrospinning of Poly[bis(ethyl alanato) phosphazene] Nanofibers , 2006 .

[5]  S. Weiner,et al.  Bone structure: from ångstroms to microns , 1992, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[6]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  Cato T. Laurencin,et al.  Nanotechnology and orthopedics: a personal perspective. , 2009, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[8]  L. Weiss,et al.  In vitro analysis of biodegradable polymer blend/hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  Cato T. Laurencin,et al.  Nanofibers and nanoparticles for orthopaedic surgery applications. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  Robert Langer,et al.  Visual Evidence of Acidic Environment Within Degrading Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) Microspheres , 2004, Pharmaceutical Research.

[11]  Casey K Chan,et al.  The fabrication of nano-hydroxyapatite on PLGA and PLGA/collagen nanofibrous composite scaffolds and their effects in osteoblastic behavior for bone tissue engineering. , 2009, Bone.

[12]  R. Lakes Materials with structural hierarchy , 1993, Nature.

[13]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Biodegradable polyphosphazene-nanohydroxyapatite composite nanofibers: scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2009, Journal of biomedical nanotechnology.

[14]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Chitosan-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microsphere-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: in vitro degradation and in vivo bone regeneration studies. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[15]  Peter X Ma,et al.  Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[16]  Benjamin Chu,et al.  Structure and morphology changes during in vitro degradation of electrospun poly(glycolide-co-lactide) nanofiber membrane. , 2003, Biomacromolecules.

[17]  Cato T. Laurencin,et al.  The Implications of Polymer Selection in Regenerative Medicine: A Comparison of Amorphous and Semi‐Crystalline Polymer for Tissue Regeneration , 2009 .

[18]  K. Leong,et al.  The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[19]  J. Buckwalter,et al.  Bone biology. I: Structure, blood supply, cells, matrix, and mineralization. , 1996, Instructional course lectures.

[20]  J. Currey Biomaterials: Sacrificial bonds heal bone , 2001, Nature.

[21]  M. Kotaki,et al.  A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites , 2003 .

[22]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Composite scaffolds: bridging nanofiber and microsphere architectures to improve bioactivity of mechanically competent constructs. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[23]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Induction of angiogenesis in tissue-engineered scaffolds designed for bone repair: A combined gene therapy–cell transplantation approach , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  C. Laurencin,et al.  Dipeptide-based polyphosphazene and polyester blends for bone tissue engineering. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[25]  Justin L. Brown,et al.  Biomimetic, bioactive etheric polyphosphazene-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) blends for bone tissue engineering. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[26]  Clément Sanchez,et al.  Biomimetism and bioinspiration as tools for the design of innovative materials and systems , 2005, Nature materials.

[27]  J. A. Cooper,et al.  Tissue engineering: orthopedic applications. , 1999, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[28]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Fabrication and optimization of methylphenoxy substituted polyphosphazene nanofibers for biomedical applications. , 2004, Biomacromolecules.

[29]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Tissue engineering of bone: material and matrix considerations. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  Casey K. Chan,et al.  Degradation behaviors of electrospun resorbable polyester nanofibers. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[31]  Cato T. Laurencin,et al.  Electrospun poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds for skin tissue engineering. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[32]  P H Krebsbach,et al.  Indirect solid free form fabrication of local and global porous, biomimetic and composite 3D polymer-ceramic scaffolds. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[33]  C. Laurencin,et al.  Fabrication, characterization, and in vitro evaluation of poly(lactic acid glycolic acid)/nano-hydroxyapatite composite microsphere-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering in rotating bioreactors. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[34]  Steve Weiner,et al.  THE MATERIAL BONE: Structure-Mechanical Function Relations , 1998 .

[35]  J. A. Cooper,et al.  Novel tubular composite matrix for bone repair. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[36]  Cato T. Laurencin,et al.  In situ Porous Structures: A Unique Polymer Erosion Mechanism in Biodegradable Dipeptide‐Based Polyphosphazene and Polyester Blends Producing Matrices for Regenerative Engineering , 2010, Advanced functional materials.

[37]  Brendon M. Baker,et al.  NANOFIBROUS BIOLOGIC LAMINATES REPLICATE THE FORM AND FUNCTION OF THE ANNULUS FIBROSUS , 2009, Nature materials.

[38]  O. Böstman,et al.  Clinical biocompatibility of biodegradable orthopaedic implants for internal fixation: a review. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[39]  P. Ma,et al.  Synthetic nano-scale fibrous extracellular matrix. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[40]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Self-Assembly at All Scales , 2002, Science.

[41]  C T Laurencin,et al.  Electrospun nanofiber scaffolds: engineering soft tissues , 2008, Biomedical materials.

[42]  M. Giraud‐Guille Twisted plywood architecture of collagen fibrils in human compact bone osteons , 1988, Calcified Tissue International.

[43]  S. Mann,et al.  Bone‐like Resorbable Silk‐based Scaffolds for Load‐bearing Osteoregenerative Applications , 2009 .

[44]  C. Laurencin,et al.  Hydrogen bonding in blends of polyesters with dipeptide‐containing polyphosphazenes , 2010 .

[45]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[46]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[47]  Jason A Burdick,et al.  Engineering on the straight and narrow: the mechanics of nanofibrous assemblies for fiber-reinforced tissue regeneration. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[48]  G. Marotti A new theory of bone lamellation , 2005, Calcified Tissue International.

[49]  C. M. Agrawal,et al.  Fundamentals of biomechanics in tissue engineering of bone. , 2000, Tissue engineering.