Use of amino acid composition to predict epitope residues of individual antibodies.

We identified specific amino acid propensities at the interfaces of antigen-antibody interactions in non-redundant qualified antigen-antibody complex structures from Protein Data Bank. Propensities were expressed by the frequency of each of the 20 x 20 standard amino acid pairs that appeared at the interfaces of the complexes and were named the antibody-specific epitope propensity (ASEP) index. Using this index, we developed a novel method of predicting epitope residues for individual antibodies by narrowing down candidate epitope residues which was predicted by the conventional method. The 74 benchmarked antigens were used in ASEP prediction. The efficiency of this method was assessed using the leave-one-out approach. On elimination of residues with ASEP indices in the lowest 10% of all measured, true positives were enriched for 49 antigens. On subsequent elimination of residues with ASEP indices in the lowest 50%, true positives were enriched for 40 of the 74 antigens assessed. The ASEP index is the first benchmark proposed to predict epitope residues for an individual antibody. Used in combination with mutation experiments, this index has the potential to markedly increase the success ratio of epitope analysis.

[1]  Itay Mayrose,et al.  Stepwise prediction of conformational discontinuous B‐cell epitopes using the Mapitope algorithm , 2007, Proteins.

[2]  A. Lesk,et al.  Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions , 1989, Nature.

[3]  Jean-Luc Pellequer,et al.  BEPITOPE: predicting the location of continuous epitopes and patterns in proteins , 2003, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[4]  Ying-hua Chen,et al.  Fine-epitope mapping of an antibody that binds the ectodomain of influenza matrix protein 2. , 2008, FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.

[5]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Structural classification of CDR‐H3 revisited: A lesson in antibody modeling , 2008, Proteins.

[6]  Timothy A. Springer,et al.  Epitope Mapping of Antibodies to the C-Terminal Region of the Integrin β2 Subunit Reveals Regions that Become Exposed Upon Receptor Activation1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[7]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  K. R. Woods,et al.  Prediction of protein antigenic determinants from amino acid sequences. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Siyi Hu,et al.  Epitope mapping and structural analysis of an anti‐ErbB2 antibody A21: Molecular basis for tumor inhibitory mechanism , 2008, Proteins.

[10]  O. Lund,et al.  Prediction of residues in discontinuous B‐cell epitopes using protein 3D structures , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[11]  A. Alix,et al.  Predictive estimation of protein linear epitopes by using the program PEOPLE. , 1999, Vaccine.

[12]  E Westhof,et al.  Predicting location of continuous epitopes in proteins from their primary structures. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[13]  Hiroki Shirai,et al.  Identification of the Druggable Concavity in Homology Models Using the PLB Index , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[14]  R. Frank.  The SPOT-synthesis technique. Synthetic peptide arrays on membrane supports--principles and applications. , 2002, Journal of immunological methods.

[15]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  Bernd Mayer,et al.  Machine learning approaches for prediction of linear B‐cell epitopes on proteins , 2006, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[17]  S. Jones,et al.  Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Morten Nielsen,et al.  Improved method for predicting linear B-cell epitopes , 2006, Immunome research.

[19]  Yuxin Li,et al.  Pep-3D-Search: a method for B-cell epitope prediction based on mimotope analysis , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[20]  Hiroki Shirai,et al.  Chemocavity: Specific Concavity in Protein Reserved for the Binding of Biologically Functional Small Molecules , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[21]  Hiroki Shirai,et al.  Use of Amino Acid Composition to Predict Ligand-Binding Sites , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[22]  A. Lesk,et al.  Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Systematic classification of CDR‐L3 in antibodies: Implications of the light chain subtypes and the VL–VH interface , 2009, Proteins.