Emerging frontiers in wind engineering: Computing, stochastics, machine learning and beyond

Abstract Over the last several decades, wind engineering a multi-disciplinary subject involving engineering meteorology, fluid dynamics, structural dynamics, structural engineering, probabilistic methods, and design has addressed the challenges posed by winds of synoptic and non-synoptic origins. Combined computational approaches and laboratory to full-scale experiments have enhanced our ability to design and construct wind-resistant structures that range from low-rise to supertall buildings, footbridges to super long-span bridges and, wind turbines on the ground and floating foundations and floating offshore drilling and production systems. During this period, we have seen extraordinary advances in experimental facilities, instrumentation and data acquisition and management. At the laboratory scale, new wind tunnels have emerged with added features like extra-wide cross-sections, from passive to active driving systems, from boundary layer to flow simulators with vortical flows mimicking non-synoptic winds features. While at full-scale, we have been able to use deployable sensing networks in the path of landfalling hurricanes/typhoons to monitoring in real-time the performance of tall buildings and long-span bridges during extreme wind events. Advanced technologies like aerial surveying using drones and satellite imagery have been employed to enhance the post-storm surveillance capabilities. These advances have enabled us to build a cadre of civil infrastructure that meets some of the challenges posed by the extreme winds. Yet there remain several frontiers that still need to be addressed for example the three “Nons,” the triple emerging fronts, i.e., non-stationarity, non-Gaussianity, non-linearity prevalent in the changing dynamic of winds prevailing in gust fronts, vortical and convective systems, rolls, meso-scale features and intermittent turbulence. In the face of these challenges, increasing heights, spans, and depths of structures exposed to these winds pose additional challenges as their performance becomes more sensitive to their dynamics, thus necessitating new tools and perspectives that go beyond customary analysis and modeling norms. Fortunately, amidst these challenges, there are new opportunities to complement our existing capabilities as the burgeoning growth in computational resources and parallel computational advances coupled with data analytics and AI-based schemes, e.g., machine learning hold the promise of expanding our modeling and simulation capacity far beyond our current conventional schemes offer. All these advances can be couched in a Generalized Wind Loading Chain to capture the three “Nons” by building upon the wind loading chain proposed by Davenport based on linear and stationary conditions. An example of the Gust Front Factor in this framework is an effective means for designing under non-synoptic winds. This paper expands on these new computational opportunities and ways to take advantage of their added capabilities to address emerging challenges in building a resilient and sustainable civil infrastructure and beyond to stability and safety of high-speed trains.

[1]  M. Shields,et al.  Simulation of higher-order stochastic processes by spectral representation , 2017 .

[2]  Y. Tamura,et al.  Measurement of Wind-induced Response of Buildings using RTK-GPS , 2001 .

[3]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Applications of shapelet transform to time series classification of earthquake, wind and wave data , 2020, ArXiv.

[4]  M. Cid Montoya,et al.  Shape optimization of streamlined decks of cable-stayed bridges considering aeroelastic and structural constraints , 2018, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.

[5]  Rodrigo Capobianco Guido,et al.  Fusing time, frequency and shape-related information: Introduction to the Discrete Shapelet Transform's second generation (DST-II) , 2018, Inf. Fusion.

[6]  A. Kareem,et al.  SIMULATION OF A CLASS OF NON-NORMAL RANDOM PROCESSES , 1996 .

[7]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Comparison Metrics for Time-Histories: Application to Bridge Aerodynamics , 2020 .

[8]  Richard L. Wood,et al.  Multi-Scale Remote Sensing of Tornado Effects , 2018, Front. Built Environ..

[9]  L. Carassale,et al.  Proper orthogonal decomposition in wind engineering - Part 1: A state-of-the-art and some prospects , 2007 .

[10]  A. Kareem,et al.  Generalized Wind Loading Chain: Time-Frequency Modeling Framework for Nonstationary Wind Effects on Structures , 2019, Journal of Structural Engineering.

[11]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Performance evaluation of Canton Tower under winds based on full-scale data , 2012 .

[12]  Xihaier Luo,et al.  Dynamics of random pressure fields over bluff bodies: a dynamic mode decomposition perspective , 2019, 1904.02245.

[13]  Xihaier Luo,et al.  Deep convolutional neural networks for uncertainty propagation in random fields , 2019, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[14]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  A multi-fidelity shape optimization via surrogate modeling for civil structures , 2018, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.

[15]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  A conditional simulation of non-normal velocity/pressure fields , 1998 .

[16]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Analysis interpretation modeling and simulation of unsteady wind and pressure data , 1997 .

[17]  Pierre Sagaut,et al.  Toward advanced subgrid models for Lattice-Boltzmann-based Large-eddy simulation: Theoretical formulations , 2010, Comput. Math. Appl..

[18]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Artificial Intelligence—The Revolution Hasn’t Happened Yet , 2019, Issue 1.

[19]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Numerical simulation of wind effects: A probabilistic perspective , 2006 .

[20]  Douglas Thain,et al.  Lessons Learned from Crowdsourcing Complex Engineering Tasks , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Time-Frequency Analysis of Nonstationary Process Based on Multivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition , 2016 .

[22]  A. Kareem,et al.  Fragility modelling framework for transmission line towers under winds , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[23]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  The effect of aerodynamic interference on the dynamic response of prismatic structures , 1987 .

[24]  Michele Barbato,et al.  Multihazard Interaction Effects on the Performance of Low-Rise Wood-Frame Housing in Hurricane-Prone Regions , 2017 .

[25]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  A Cyber-Based Data-Enabled Virtual Organization for Wind Load Effects on Civil Infrastructures: VORTEX-Winds , 2017, Front. Built Environ..

[26]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Semi-active tuned liquid column dampers for vibration control of structures , 2001 .

[27]  Simulation of correlated multivariate processes with non-Gaussian marginal and joint probability density functions , 2014 .

[28]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Correlation structure of random pressure fields , 1997 .

[29]  Douglas Thain,et al.  Adapting Collaborative Software Development Techniques to Structural Engineering , 2015, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[30]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Performance-based design and optimization of uncertain wind-excited dynamic building systems , 2014 .

[31]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Computation of failure probability via hierarchical clustering , 2016 .

[32]  A. Kareem,et al.  Wind-induced effects on bluff bodies in turbulent flows: Nonstationary, non-Gaussian and nonlinear features , 2013 .

[33]  A. Kareem,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Nonstationary Processes Utilizing Wavelet and Hilbert Transforms , 2014 .

[34]  Yukio Tamura,et al.  Damping Evaluation Using Full-Scale Data of Buildings in Japan , 2003 .

[35]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Automated Poststorm Damage Classification of Low-Rise Building Roofing Systems Using High-Resolution Aerial Imagery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[36]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  PRESSURE FLUCTUATIONS ON A SQUARE BUILDING MODEL IN BOUNDARY-LAYER FLOWS , 1984 .

[37]  A. Kareem,et al.  Aerodynamic Tailoring of Structures Using Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2019, Structural Engineering International.

[38]  Gianluca Iaccarino,et al.  IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHODS , 2005 .

[39]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  SmartSync: An Integrated Real-Time Structural Health Monitoring and Structural Identification System for Tall Buildings , 2013 .

[40]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Probabilistic machine learning and artificial intelligence , 2015, Nature.

[41]  Seymour M.J. Spence,et al.  A performance-based damage estimation framework for the building envelope of wind-excited engineered structures , 2019, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.

[42]  Xihaier Luo,et al.  Bayesian deep learning with hierarchical prior: Predictions from limited and noisy data , 2019, Structural Safety.

[43]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Efficacy of Hilbert and Wavelet Transforms for Time-Frequency Analysis , 2006 .

[44]  A. Kareem,et al.  Identification of Vortex-Induced Vibration of Tall Building Pinnacle Using Cluster Analysis for Fatigue Evaluation: Application to Burj Khalifa , 2020 .

[45]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects , 2015, Science.

[46]  S. Yalla,et al.  DYNAMIC LOAD SIMULATOR: DEVELOPMENT OF A PROTOTYPE , 2001 .

[47]  Y. Tamura,et al.  PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION OF RANDOM WIND PRESSURE FIELD , 1999 .

[48]  Dinesh C. Sharma,et al.  Ports in a Storm , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[49]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.