Age-based partitioning of individual genomic inbreeding levels in Belgian Blue cattle

AbstractBackground Inbreeding coefficients can be estimated either from pedigree data or from genomic data, and with genomic data, they are either global or local (when the linkage map is used). Recently, we developed a new hidden Markov model (HMM) that estimates probabilities of homozygosity-by-descent (HBD) at each marker position and automatically partitions autozygosity in multiple age-related classes (based on the length of HBD segments). Our objectives were to: (1) characterize inbreeding with our model in an intensively selected population such as the Belgian Blue Beef (BBB) cattle breed; (2) compare the properties of the model at different marker densities; and (3) compare our model with other methods. ResultsWhen using 600 K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the inbreeding coefficient (probability of sampling an HBD locus in an individual) was on average 0.303 (ranging from 0.258 to 0.375). HBD-classes associated to historical ancestors (with small segments ≤ 200 kb) accounted for 21.6% of the genome length (71.4% of the total length of the genome in HBD segments), whereas classes associated to more recent ancestors accounted for only 22.6% of the total length of the genome in HBD segments. However, these recent classes presented more individual variation than more ancient classes. Although inbreeding coefficients obtained with low SNP densities (7 and 32 K) were much lower (0.060 and 0.093), they were highly correlated with those obtained at higher density (r = 0.934 and 0.975, respectively), indicating that they captured most of the individual variation. At higher SNP density, smaller HBD segments are identified and, thus, more past generations can be explored. We observed very high correlations between our estimates and those based on homozygosity (r = 0.95) or on runs-of-homozygosity (r = 0.95). As expected, pedigree-based estimates were mainly correlated with recent HBD-classes (r = 0.56).ConclusionsAlthough we observed high levels of autozygosity associated with small HBD segments in BBB cattle, recent inbreeding accounted for most of the individual variation. Recent autozygosity can be captured efficiently with low-density SNP arrays and relatively simple models (e.g., two HBD classes). The HMM framework provides local HBD probabilities that are still useful at lower SNP densities.

[1]  Yali Xue,et al.  BCFtools/RoH: a hidden Markov model approach for detecting autozygosity from next-generation sequencing data , 2016, Bioinform..

[2]  Zachary A. Szpiech,et al.  Long runs of homozygosity are enriched for deleterious variation. , 2013, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  Johann Sölkner,et al.  Estimating autozygosity from high-throughput information: effects of SNP density and genotyping errors , 2013, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[4]  M. Webster,et al.  The legacy of domestication: accumulation of deleterious mutations in the dog genome. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.

[5]  Ignacy Misztal,et al.  BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90) , 2002 .

[6]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Whole-genome sequencing of 234 bulls facilitates mapping of monogenic and complex traits in cattle , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[7]  Z. Zhang,et al.  Ancestral haplotype-based association mapping with generalized linear mixed models accounting for stratification , 2012, Bioinform..

[8]  E. Peripolli,et al.  Runs of homozygosity: current knowledge and applications in livestock. , 2017, Animal genetics.

[9]  E. Mullaart,et al.  Coding and noncoding variants in HFM1, MLH3, MSH4, MSH5, RNF212, and RNF212B affect recombination rate in cattle , 2016, Genome research.

[10]  M. Georges,et al.  NGS-based reverse genetic screen for common embryonic lethal mutations compromising fertility in livestock , 2016, Genome research.

[11]  Richard M Myers,et al.  Genomic patterns of homozygosity in worldwide human populations. , 2012, American journal of human genetics.

[12]  Jurg Ott,et al.  Genome‐wide autozygosity mapping in human populations , 2009, Genetic epidemiology.

[13]  Igor Rudan,et al.  Runs of homozygosity in European populations. , 2008, American journal of human genetics.

[14]  O. Vangen,et al.  Analysis of inbreeding depression in the first litter size of mice in a long-term selection experiment with respect to the age of the inbreeding , 2007, Heredity.

[15]  Tom Druet,et al.  A Splice Site Variant in the Bovine RNF11 Gene Compromises Growth and Regulation of the Inflammatory Response , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[16]  J. Weber,et al.  Long homozygous chromosomal segments in reference families from the centre d'Etude du polymorphisme humain. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[17]  J. Sölkner,et al.  Estimates of autozygosity derived from runs of homozygosity: empirical evidence from selected cattle populations. , 2013, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[18]  Manuel A. R. Ferreira,et al.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  K. Ropka-Molik,et al.  Characteristics of runs of homozygosity in selected cattle breeds maintained in Poland , 2016 .

[20]  M. Gautier,et al.  A model‐based approach to characterize individual inbreeding at both global and local genomic scales , 2017, Molecular ecology.

[21]  M. Gautier,et al.  Identification of large selective sweeps associated with major genes in cattle. , 2013, Animal genetics.

[22]  D. Bradley,et al.  Runs of homozygosity and population history in cattle , 2012, BMC Genetics.

[23]  T. Druet,et al.  A strategy to improve phasing of whole-genome sequenced individuals through integration of familial information from dense genotype panels , 2017, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[24]  Michel Georges,et al.  A deletion in the bovine myostatin gene causes the double–muscled phenotype in cattle , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[25]  Harry Campbell,et al.  Genomic Runs of Homozygosity Record Population History and Consanguinity , 2010, PloS one.

[26]  M. Georges,et al.  Allelic heterogeneity of Crooked Tail Syndrome: result of balancing selection? , 2012, Animal genetics.

[27]  D. Bickhart,et al.  Revealing misassembled segments in the bovine reference genome by high resolution linkage disequilibrium scan , 2016, BMC Genomics.

[28]  T. Szmatoła,et al.  The use of runs of homozygosity for estimation of recent inbreeding in Holstein cattle , 2016, Journal of Applied Genetics.

[29]  M. Georges,et al.  A stop-gain in the laminin, alpha 3 gene causes recessive junctional epidermolysis bullosa in Belgian Blue cattle. , 2015, Animal genetics.

[30]  G. Leroy,et al.  Inbreeding depression in livestock species: review and meta-analysis. , 2014, Animal genetics.

[31]  K. Weigel,et al.  Evaluation of inbreeding depression in Holstein cattle using whole-genome SNP markers and alternative measures of genomic inbreeding. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[32]  I. Huijbers,et al.  Balancing Selection of a Frame-Shift Mutation in the MRC2 Gene Accounts for the Outbreak of the Crooked Tail Syndrome in Belgian Blue Cattle , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[33]  P. Visscher,et al.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of heritability for human height , 2011 .

[34]  D. Boichard,et al.  Pedig: a Fortran package for pedigree analysis suited for large populations. , 2002 .

[35]  M. Georges,et al.  Selection in action: dissecting the molecular underpinnings of the increasing muscle mass of Belgian Blue Cattle , 2014, BMC Genomics.

[36]  M. Calus,et al.  Estimation of inbreeding using pedigree, 50k SNP chip genotypes and full sequence data in three cattle breeds , 2015, BMC Genetics.

[37]  Merete Fredholm,et al.  Highly effective SNP-based association mapping and management of recessive defects in livestock , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[38]  P. Visscher,et al.  GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. , 2011, American journal of human genetics.

[39]  M. Groenen,et al.  Regions of Homozygosity in the Porcine Genome: Consequence of Demography and the Recombination Landscape , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[40]  M. Goddard,et al.  Identification of genomic regions associated with inbreeding depression in Holstein and Jersey dairy cattle , 2014, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[41]  Mathieu Gautier,et al.  WIDDE: a Web-Interfaced next generation database for genetic diversity exploration, with a first application in cattle , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[42]  Kermit Ritland,et al.  Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients , 1996 .

[43]  P. Ajmone-Marsan,et al.  Analysis of runs of homozygosity and their relationship with inbreeding in five cattle breeds farmed in Italy. , 2015, Animal genetics.

[44]  Tom Druet,et al.  LINKPHASE3: an improved pedigree-based phasing algorithm robust to genotyping and map errors , 2015, Bioinform..

[45]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Genomic inbreeding and relationships among Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[46]  A. Sartelet,et al.  A missense mutation accelerating the gating of the lysosomal Cl−/H+-exchanger ClC-7/Ostm1 causes osteopetrosis with gingival hamartomas in cattle , 2013, Disease Models & Mechanisms.

[47]  Yurii S. Aulchenko,et al.  A Genomic Background Based Method for Association Analysis in Related Individuals , 2007, PloS one.

[48]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[49]  Anders Albrechtsen,et al.  Estimating IBD tracts from low coverage NGS data , 2016, Bioinform..

[50]  G. Malécot,et al.  Les mathématiques de l'hérédité , 1948 .

[51]  J. Sölkner,et al.  Inbreeding and runs of homozygosity: A possible solution to an old problem , 2014 .

[52]  M. Georges,et al.  Genome-wide next-generation DNA and RNA sequencing reveals a mutation that perturbs splicing of the phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class H gene (PIGH) and causes arthrogryposis in Belgian Blue cattle , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[53]  Leif Andersson,et al.  Prehistoric genomes reveal the genetic foundation and cost of horse domestication , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Bernard Prum,et al.  Estimation of the inbreeding coefficient through use of genomic data. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[55]  M. Sargolzaei,et al.  A fast algorithm for computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations. , 2005, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[56]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.