Advancing Social Equity in the Minnowbrook Tradition

The goals of valuing social equity and using it as a guide in managing public programs are firmly rooted in the Minnowbrook tradition. Although civil rights activists have long fought for equality, attendees at the Minnowbrook I conference in 1968 were among the first in the field of public administration to directly confront societal inequities by asserting that public administrators should, in addition to valuing efficiency and effectiveness, stress the value social equity in the management and distribution of public services. The field's emphasis on social equity continued on through Minnowbrook II and was identified as a key concern during the most recent Minnowbrook III conference. After briefly summarizing discussion on this topic during Minnowbrook III, this article provides an agenda for advancing the field's commitment to social equity. This agenda centers upon clarifying the conceptual parameters of social equity, transforming the place of social equity in academic instruction, and building upon existing themes and methodologies in social equity research. Last, predictions for the role of social equity at a future Minnowbrook IV conference are presented for further consideration.

[1]  Leisha DeHart‐Davis,et al.  Gender and Organizational Rule Abidance , 2009 .

[2]  Norma M. Riccucci The Pursuit of Social Equity in the Federal Government: A Road Less Traveled? , 2009 .

[3]  David W. Pitts Diversity Management, Job Satisfaction, and Performance: Evidence from U.S. Federal Agencies , 2009 .

[4]  M. Rivera,et al.  Refocusing Graduate Public Affairs Education: A Need for Diversity Competencies in Human Resource Management , 2007 .

[5]  Sanjay K. Pandey,et al.  Gender Dimensions of Public Service Motivation , 2006 .

[6]  Lael R. Keiser,et al.  Linking Passive and Active Representation by Gender: The Case of Child Support Agencies , 2004 .

[7]  Norma M. Riccucci,et al.  Linking Passive and Active Representation: The Case of Frontline Workers in Welfare Agencies , 2004 .

[8]  M. Rice Organizational Culture, Social Equity, and Diversity: Teaching Public Administration Education in the Postmodern Era , 2004 .

[9]  James H. Svara,et al.  Filling in the Skeletal Pillar: Addressing Social Equity in Introductory Courses in Public Administration , 2004 .

[10]  Katherine C. Naff,et al.  Responding to a Wake-up Call , 2004 .

[11]  J. Martin,et al.  The Use of the Conceptual Category of Race in American Sociology, 1937–99 , 2003 .

[12]  Robin Stryker Mind the Gap: Law, Institutional Analysis and Socioeconomics , 2003 .

[13]  Susan S. Silbey,et al.  Narrating Social Structure: Stories of Resistance to Legal Authority1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  David H. Rosenbloom,et al.  Representative Bureaucracy: Classic Readings and Continuing Controversies , 2003 .

[15]  Lael R. Keiser,et al.  Lipstick and Logarithms: Gender, Institutional Context, and Representative Bureaucracy , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[16]  K. Meier,et al.  Structure and Discretion: Missing Links in Representative Bureaucracy , 2001 .

[17]  Sally Selden,et al.  Rethinking Diversity in Public Organizations for the 21st Century , 2001 .

[18]  Julie A. Dolan The Senior Executive Service: Gender, Attitudes, and Representative Bureaucracy , 2000 .

[19]  K. Monroe,et al.  NARRATIVE IN POLITICAL SCIENCE , 1998 .

[20]  Norma M. Riccucci,et al.  The Representativeness of State-Level Bureaucratic Leaders: A Missing Piece of the Representative Bureaucracy Puzzle , 1997 .

[21]  E. Bonilla-Silva,et al.  RETHINKING RACISM: TOWARD A STRUCTURAL INTERPRETATION * , 1997 .

[22]  K. Meier,et al.  The Influence of Educational and Political Resources on Minority Students' Success , 1995 .

[23]  I. Cohen,et al.  Autonomy and credibility: Voice as method , 1994 .

[24]  K. Meier Latinos and Representative Bureaucracy Testing the Thompson and Henderson Hypotheses , 1993 .

[25]  David R. Maines,et al.  Narrative's Moment and Sociology's Phenomena: Toward a Narrative Sociology , 1993 .

[26]  L. R. Wise Social Equity in Civil Service Systems , 1990 .

[27]  James L. Perry,et al.  The Motivational Bases of Public Service , 1990 .

[28]  H. George Frederickson,et al.  Public Administration and Social Equity. , 1990 .

[29]  W. Sewell A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  M. Guy Minnowbrook II: Conclusions , 1989 .

[31]  David H. Rosenbloom,et al.  The new public personnel and the new public service , 1989 .

[32]  K. Meier,et al.  Representative Bureaucracy and Policy Preferences: A Study in the Attitudes of Federal Executives , 1976 .

[33]  Samuel Krislov The Negro in Federal Employment: The Quest for Equal Opportunity , 1967 .

[34]  P. Rutledge Some Unfinished Business in Public Administration , 2002 .

[35]  Gregory B. Lewis,et al.  Who Wants to Work for the Government , 2002 .

[36]  Gretchen B. Rossman,et al.  Designing qualitative research, 3rd ed. , 1999 .

[37]  S. Silbey,et al.  Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: toward a sociology of narrative , 1995 .