It’s Not Me, It’s You: How Gift Giving Creates Giver Identity Threat as a Function of Social Closeness

Prior research has established that consumers are motivated to purchase identity-consistent products. We extend consumer identity research into an important consumer context, gift giving, in which individuals may make product choices that run counter to their own identities in order to fulfill the desires of the intended recipient. We find that purchasing an identity-contrary gift for a close (vs. distant) friend who is an integral part of the self can itself cause an identity threat to the giver. Four experiments in a gift registry context show that after making an identity-contrary gift choice for a close (vs. distant) friend, givers subsequently engage in behaviors that reestablish their identity such as indicating greater identity affiliation with the threatened identity and greater likelihood to purchase identity-expressive products. This research highlights the opposing forces that product purchase may exert on consumer identity as both a potential threat and means of self-verification.

[1]  Luk Warlop,et al.  Why it is so Hard to Predict Our Partner's Product Preferences: The Effect of Target Familiarity on Prediction Accuracy , 2006 .

[2]  Jennifer K. Bosson,et al.  When saying and doing diverge: The effects ofstereotype threat on self-reported versus nonverbal anxiety , 2004 .

[3]  I. Yalom Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego , 1974 .

[4]  Phillip Atiba Goff,et al.  The space between us: stereotype threat and distance in interracial contexts. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Sigmund Freud,et al.  Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego , 1924 .

[6]  Alicia D. Cast,et al.  A Theory of Self-Esteem , 2002 .

[7]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[8]  Gita Venkataramani Johar,et al.  How Well Do You Know Me? Consumer Calibration of Others Knowledge , 2003 .

[9]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Commitment and the context of social perception , 1999 .

[10]  S. Levy Symbols for Sale , 1999 .

[11]  C. Heath,et al.  Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product Domains , 2007 .

[12]  B. Schwartz,et al.  The Social Psychology of the Gift , 1967, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  The Conflicting Choices of Alternating Selves , 2010 .

[14]  T. Caplow Christmas Gifts and Kin Networks , 1982 .

[15]  Francesca Gino,et al.  Give them what they want: The benefits of explicitness in gift exchange , 2011 .

[16]  Susan M. Broniarczyk,et al.  Choice under restrictions , 2008 .

[17]  Jerome B. Kernan,et al.  Mundane Consumption and the Self: A Social-Identity Perspective , 1993 .

[18]  Kenneth D. Bahn,et al.  Developmental Recognition of Consumption Symbolism , 1982 .

[19]  A. Aron,et al.  Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. , 1988 .

[20]  W. Swann,et al.  Identity fusion: the interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  M. Sirgy,et al.  Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review , 1982 .

[22]  H. Harlow The Nature of Love , 1958 .

[23]  Al Evans Birdwell A study of the influence of image congruence on consumer choice , 1968 .

[24]  Americus Reed Activating the Self‐Importance of Consumer Selves: Exploring Identity Salience Effects on Judgments , 2004 .

[25]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[26]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content , 1999 .

[27]  Americus Reed,et al.  Sticky Priors: The Perseverance of Identity Effects on Judgment , 2004 .

[28]  R. Deshpandé,et al.  Identity salience and the influence of differential activation of the social self-schema on advertising response. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[30]  K. Teigen,et al.  Giver-receiver asymmetries in gift preferences. , 2005, The British journal of social psychology.

[31]  A. H. Maslow A Theory of Metamotivation : the Biological Rooting of the Value-Life , 1967 .

[32]  R. Petty,et al.  Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  S. C. Wheeler,et al.  The “Shaken Self”: Product Choices as a Means of Restoring Self‐View Confidence , 2009 .

[34]  N. Anderson,et al.  Combining visual and verbal information in an impression-formation task. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Gita Venkataramani Johar,et al.  Do You Know Me? Consumer Calibration of Friends' Knowledge , 2006 .

[36]  Jennifer Edson Escalas,et al.  Self‐Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning , 2005 .

[37]  J. J. F. Sherry Gift Giving in Anthropological Perspective , 1983 .

[38]  J. Aaker,et al.  Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .

[39]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[40]  A. Aron,et al.  Close Relationships as Including Other in the Self , 1991 .