A grand challenge for membrane desalination: More water, less carbon

Abstract The decarbonisation of membrane desalination is a grand challenge due to the competing demands of more water for a thirsty world and the urgent need to reduce carbon emissions to mitigate climate change. This paper is a review of some developing strategies that could lead to lower energy use and thereby reduce the carbon foot print of desalination. Each strategy brings benefits along with technical challenges that are research opportunities. The use of very low energy ‘engineered biofilms’ coupled with biomimicry control of biofouling could almost eliminate pretreatment energy. Improved membranes based on ‘water channels’ could contribute to reduced energy demand but high flux operation will need novel mass transfer control and will be constrained by module engineering. Significant energy benefits could come from combining seawater RO with wastewater reclamation using forward osmosis and pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO), although fouling by the wastewater stream requires special attention. The overall potential of the novel pretreatments, membranes and post-treatments is to more than halve the net energy of RO desalination. However there would be significant trade-offs to achieve this level of decarbonisation. The application of renewable energy is considered in the context of a membrane-enabled osmotic battery using PRO for discharge and advanced RO for recharge. Finally, low energy desalination for agriculture is being developed using novel applications of forward osmosis.

[1]  D. McDougald,et al.  Gravity-driven membrane filtration as pretreatment for seawater reverse osmosis: linking biofouling layer morphology with flux stabilization. , 2015, Water research.

[2]  M. Elimelech,et al.  The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment , 2011, Science.

[3]  Akshay Deshmukh,et al.  Pressure-retarded osmosis for power generation from salinity gradients: is it viable? , 2016 .

[4]  W. Krantz,et al.  Energy-efficient reverse osmosis desalination: Effect of retentate recycle and pump and energy recovery device efficiencies , 2015 .

[5]  Rong Wang,et al.  Composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes: Integration of RO- and NF-like selective layers for enhanced organic fouling resistance , 2015 .

[6]  Cynthia Hallé,et al.  Reversible and irreversible low-pressure membrane foulants in drinking water treatment: Identification by principal component analysis of fluorescence EEM and mitigation by biofiltration pretreatment. , 2011, Water research.

[7]  Haluk Beyenal,et al.  Quorum sensing: a new biofouling control paradigm in a membrane bioreactor for advanced wastewater treatment. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Noreddine Ghaffour,et al.  Subsurface intakes for seawater reverse osmosis facilities: Capacity limitation, water quality improvement, and economics , 2013 .

[9]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Nature gives the best solution for desalination: Aquaporin-based hollow fiber composite membrane with superior performance , 2015 .

[10]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Strategic Co-Location in a Hybrid Process Involving Desalination and Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO) , 2013, Membranes.

[11]  R. Guha,et al.  Reactive micromixing eliminates fouling and concentration polarization in reverse osmosis membranes , 2017 .

[12]  Noreddine Ghaffour,et al.  Membrane-based seawater desalination: Present and future prospects , 2017 .

[13]  Ahmad Fauzi Ismail,et al.  Carbon nanotubes for desalination: Performance evaluation and current hurdles , 2013 .

[14]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Unsteady-state shear strategies to enhance mass-transfer for the implementation of ultrapermeable membranes in reverse osmosis: A review , 2015 .

[15]  S. Rice,et al.  Microbial activity in biofilter used as a pretreatment for seawater desalination , 2013 .

[16]  A. Jang,et al.  Enhancement of cleaning-in-place (CIP) of a reverse osmosis desalination process with air micro-nano bubbles , 2017 .

[17]  C. D. Lundin,et al.  A multi-barrier osmotic dilution process for simultaneous desalination and purification of impaired water , 2010 .

[18]  Steve Siverns,et al.  Comparison of Membrane-based Solutions for Water Reclamation and Desalination , 2005 .

[19]  Noam Lior,et al.  Sustainability as the quantitative norm for water desalination impacts , 2017 .

[20]  Soteris A. Kalogirou,et al.  Seawater desalination using renewable energy sources , 2005 .

[21]  B. Richards,et al.  Renewable energy powered membrane technology: Brackish water desalination system operated using real wind fluctuations and energy buffering , 2014 .

[22]  Jiun Hui Low,et al.  Quorum quenching bacteria can be used to inhibit the biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes. , 2017, Water research.

[23]  P. R. Neal,et al.  Estimation of foulant deposition across the leaf of a spiral-wound module☆ , 2002 .

[24]  Anthony G Fane,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment for desalination: a review on methodology feasibility and reliability. , 2014, Water research.

[25]  Zafarullah Khan,et al.  Biofouling in reverse osmosis membranes for seawater desalination: Phenomena and prevention , 2011 .

[26]  D. Zarzo,et al.  Spanish experience in desalination for agriculture , 2013 .

[27]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  Comparison of solid, liquid and powder forms of 3D printing techniques in membrane spacer fabrication , 2017 .

[28]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Performance limiting effects in power generation from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Frederik Hammes,et al.  Stabilization of flux during dead-end ultra-low pressure ultrafiltration. , 2010, Water research.

[30]  Mohammad Badruzzaman,et al.  Energy minimization strategies and renewable energy utilization for desalination: a review. , 2011, Water research.

[31]  J. Grossman,et al.  Water desalination across nanoporous graphene. , 2012, Nano letters.

[32]  G. Leslie,et al.  LONG-TERM VALIDATION OF A MEMBRANE-BASED SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION SYSTEM , 2017 .

[33]  Sherub Phuntsho,et al.  Fertiliser drawn forward osmosis process: Pilot-scale desalination of mine impaired water for fertigation , 2016 .

[34]  Rong Wang,et al.  Enhancing pressure retarded osmosis performance with low-pressure nanofiltration pretreatment: Membrane fouling analysis and mitigation , 2017 .

[35]  Ho Kyong Shon,et al.  Pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) for integrating seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation: Energy consumption and fouling , 2015 .

[36]  G. K. Pearce,et al.  UF/MF pre-treatment to RO in seawater and wastewater reuse applications: a comparison of energy costs , 2008 .

[37]  Ronan K. McGovern,et al.  Quantifying the potential of ultra-permeable membranes for water desalination , 2014 .

[38]  H. S. Tan,et al.  Gravity-driven microfiltration pretreatment for reverse osmosis (RO) seawater desalination: Microbial community characterization and RO performance , 2017 .

[39]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Water permeability and water/salt selectivity tradeoff in polymers for desalination , 2008 .

[40]  Goen Ho,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of seawater reverse osmosis desalination plant powered by renewable energy , 2014 .

[41]  J. J. Sadhwani,et al.  Measurement of biofouling in seawater: some practical tests , 2008 .

[42]  R. Baker,et al.  Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis , 1981 .

[43]  Rong Wang,et al.  Pressure-retarded osmosis with wastewater concentrate feed: Fouling process considerations , 2017 .

[44]  Anthony G Fane,et al.  Synthetic membranes for water purification: status and future. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[45]  Chun Feng Wan,et al.  Osmotic power generation by pressure retarded osmosis using seawater brine as the draw solution and wastewater retentate as the feed , 2015 .

[46]  Sherub Phuntsho,et al.  A novel low energy fertilizer driven forward osmosis desalination for direct fertigation: Evaluating , 2011 .

[47]  D. McDougald,et al.  Biofouling in reverse osmosis processes: The roles of flux, crossflow velocity and concentration polarization in biofilm development , 2014 .

[48]  Xiao Hu,et al.  Synthesis of robust and high-performance aquaporin-based biomimetic membranes by interfacial polymerization-membrane preparation and RO performance characterization , 2012 .

[49]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  A conceptual design of spacers with hairy structures for membrane processes , 2016 .

[50]  E. Hoek,et al.  Transport through composite membrane, part 1: Is there an optimal support membrane? , 2012 .

[51]  Avi Efraty,et al.  CCD series no-19: The lowest energy prospects for SWRO through single-element modules under plug-flow and closed-circuit desalination conditions , 2016 .

[52]  D. Hassett,et al.  Involvement of Nitric Oxide in Biofilm Dispersal of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[53]  Laura Chekli,et al.  Environmental and economic impacts of fertilizer drawn forward osmosis and nanofiltration hybrid system , 2017 .

[54]  Jiun Hui Low,et al.  Nitric Oxide Treatment for the Control of Reverse Osmosis Membrane Biofouling , 2015, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.