A two-dimensional analysis of the sensitivity of a pulse first break to wave speed contrast on a scale below the resolution length of ray tomography.

Mapping the speed of mechanical waves traveling inside a medium is a topic of great interest across many fields from geoscience to medical diagnostics. Much work has been done to characterize the fidelity with which the geometrical features of the medium can be reconstructed and multiple resolution criteria have been proposed depending on the wave-matter interaction model used to decode the wave speed map from scattering measurements. However, these criteria do not define the accuracy with which the wave speed values can be reconstructed. Using two-dimensional simulations, it is shown that the first-arrival traveltime predicted by ray theory can be an accurate representation of the arrival of a pulse first break even in the presence of diffraction and other phenomena that are not accounted for by ray theory. As a result, ray-based tomographic inversions can yield accurate wave speed estimations also when the size of a sound speed anomaly is smaller than the resolution length of the inversion method provided that traveltimes are estimated from the signal first break. This increased sensitivity however renders the inversion more susceptible to noise since the amplitude of the signal around the first break is typically low especially when three-dimensional anomalies are considered.

[1]  Fuchun Gao,et al.  The limits and complementary nature of traveltime and waveform tomography , 2002 .

[2]  S. C. Bloch Eighth velocity of light , 1977 .

[3]  P. Williamson,et al.  A guide to the limits of resolution imposed by scattering in ray tomography , 1991 .

[4]  Understanding finite-frequency wave phenomena: phase-ray formulation and inhomogeneity scattering , 1994 .

[5]  P. Cawley,et al.  High resolution guided wave tomography , 2013 .

[6]  Marta Woodward,et al.  Wave-equation tomography , 1992 .

[7]  Richard L. Smith The Velocities of Light , 1970 .

[8]  R. Snieder,et al.  The Fresnel volume and transmitted waves , 2004 .

[9]  R. Pratt Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain; Part 1, Theory and verification in a physical scale model , 1999 .

[10]  N. V. Ruiter,et al.  First results of a clinical study with 3D ultrasound computer tomography , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[11]  Charles-Antoine Guérin,et al.  Influence of multiple scattering on the resolution of an imaging system: a Cramér-Rao analysis. , 2007, Optics express.

[12]  N. Duric,et al.  Diffraction and coherence in breast ultrasound tomography: a study with a toroidal array. , 2009, Medical physics.

[13]  Peter B. Nagy,et al.  Guided wave tomography of pipes with high-order helical modes , 2014 .

[14]  D. I. Crecraft,et al.  The measurement of applied and residual stresses in metals using ultrasonic waves , 1967 .

[15]  E. Wolf Three-dimensional structure determination of semi-transparent objects from holographic data , 1969 .

[16]  Jean Brac,et al.  Can we image complex structures with first‐arrival traveltime? , 1993 .

[17]  J A Sethian,et al.  A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Boualem Boashash,et al.  Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal. I. Fundamentals , 1992, Proc. IEEE.

[19]  D. Schmitt,et al.  First-break timing: Arrival onset times by direct correlation , 1999 .

[20]  Francesco Simonetti,et al.  Illustration of the role of multiple scattering in subwavelength imaging from far-field measurements. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  S. Fomel,et al.  Automatic traveltime picking using instantaneous traveltime , 2013 .

[22]  D. Borup,et al.  Non-linear inverse scattering: high resolution quantitative breast tissue tomography. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  A. Malcolm,et al.  Tomographic errors from wave front healing: more than just a fast bias , 2011 .

[24]  Baldev Raj,et al.  Ultrasonic velocity measurements for estimation of grain size in austenitic stainless steel , 1995 .

[25]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Fréchet kernels for finite-frequency traveltimes—I. Theory , 2000 .

[26]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Wavefront healing: a banana–doughnut perspective , 2001 .

[27]  Vlastislav Cerveny,et al.  Seismic Ray Theory , 2003 .

[28]  N. Duric,et al.  On the spatial sampling of wave fields with circular ring apertures , 2007 .

[29]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Fréchet kernels for finite‐frequency traveltimes—II. Examples , 2000 .

[30]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Three-dimensional sensitivity kernels for finite-frequency traveltimes: the banana–doughnut paradox , 1999 .

[31]  T. Alkhalifah,et al.  Traveltime sensitivity kernels for wave equation tomography using the unwrapped phase , 2014 .

[32]  E. D. Mercerat,et al.  Cross-borehole tomography with correlation delay times , 2014 .

[33]  N. Duric,et al.  In vivo breast sound-speed imaging with ultrasound tomography. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[34]  Lianjie Huang,et al.  From beamforming to diffraction tomography , 2008 .

[35]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Three-dimensional waveform sensitivity kernels , 1998 .

[36]  Michael Fehler,et al.  Traveltime tomography: A comparison of popular methods , 1991 .