Community protocols for researchers: using sketches to communicate interaction guidelines

Reviews of research and development collaborations with indigenous communities have exhibited numerous challenges related to researcher–community interactions. Based on many accounts of indiscretions, indigenous communities have begun generating conduct guidelines for researchers. However, the effectiveness of their chosen communication methods, guaranteeing appropriate behavior of the researchers, has not been established. This research contributes to an ongoing debate around appropriate ethical conduct of researchers in situ. The aim of this study was to investigate the interpretation accuracy of interaction guidelines produced in the form of sketches by a Malaysian indigenous community. We provided eight interaction sketches to 57 students, in three continents, for interpretation and expression of their intended behavior. We found that most were unable to accurately interpret the sketches and describe intended behavioral responses. A major concern remains with the tendency to fall back on prior practices of “good” behavior, with minimal guidance on contextual practices. In an attempt to provide greater direction, we explored a speech bubble exercise with further 15 students. Our findings directly contribute to current efforts in formulating researcher–community interaction practices that should form the basis of ethical research in situ.

[1]  R. Wynberg,et al.  Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing , 2009 .

[2]  Heike Winschiers-Theophilus,et al.  A classification of cultural engagements in community technology design: introducing a transcultural approach , 2019, AI & SOCIETY.

[3]  Heike Winschiers-Theophilus,et al.  Reducing "white elephant" ICT4D projects: a community-researcher engagement , 2015, C&T.

[4]  N. Willows,et al.  Wâhkôhtowin: The Governance of Good Community–Academic Research Relationships to Improve the Health and Well-Being of Children in Alexander First Nation , 2017 .

[5]  Andrew M. Dearden,et al.  Ethical standards for the ICTD/ICT4D community: a participatory process and a co-created document , 2019, ICTD.

[6]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.10 October 2005 The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception , 2022 .

[7]  S. Eriksson,et al.  You can use my name; you don't have to steal my story--a critique of anonymity in indigenous studies. , 2010, Developing world bioethics.

[8]  K. Toros,et al.  Child protection workers’ understanding of the meaning and value of self-reflection in Estonia , 2019, Reflective Practice.

[9]  D. Pepler,et al.  Laying the Groundwork: A Practical Guide for Ethical Research with Indigenous Communities , 2017 .

[10]  D. Kleine,et al.  Minimum ethical standards for ICTD/ICT4D research , 2018 .

[11]  S. Spence,et al.  Social Skills Training with Children and Young People: Theory, Evidence and Practice. , 2003, Child and adolescent mental health.

[12]  Naska Winschiers-Goagoses,et al.  Using sketches to communicate interaction protocols of an indigenous community , 2016, PDC.

[14]  H. Castleden,et al.  Implementing the Tri-Council Policy on Ethical Research Involving Indigenous Peoples in Canada: So, How’s That Going in Mi’kma’ki? , 2017 .

[15]  Cross-Cultural Perspectives in Nonverbal Communication , 1990 .

[16]  Policy Research: Good or Bad? , 2013 .

[17]  Naska Winschiers-Goagoses,et al.  Design Democratization with Communities: Drawing Toward Locally Meaningful Design , 2012, Int. J. Sociotechnology Knowl. Dev..

[18]  R. Brandenburg,et al.  Who owns this data? using dialogic reflection to examine an ethically important moment , 2019, Reflective Practice.

[19]  Amalia G. Sabiescu,et al.  Critical Incidents Analysis: mismatching expectations and reconciling visions in intercultural encounters , 2017, J. Community Informatics.

[20]  Marlene Brant Castellano.  Ethics of Aboriginal Research , 2004 .

[21]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Does he take sugar?: moving beyond the rhetoric of compassion , 2013, INTR.

[22]  S. Spence.  Social Skills Training with Children andYoung People : Theory , Evidence and Practice , 2003 .

[23]  Elisabeth Fonteneau,et al.  Cultural Differences in Perception: Observations from a Remote Culture , 2008 .

[24]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[25]  N. Willows.  Ethical principles of health research involving Indigenous peoples. , 2013, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[26]  Heike Winschiers-Theophilus,et al.  Reviving an indigenous rainforest sign language: digital Oroo' adventure game , 2015, ICTD '15.

[27]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Deriving Engagement Protocols Within Community-Based Co-design Projects in Namibia , 2017, ICT4D.

[28]  Sara Vannini,et al.  “When words become unclear”: unmasking ICT through visual methodologies in participatory ICT4D , 2017, Ai & Society.

[29]  R. Wynberg,et al.  Indigenous peoples, consent and benefit sharing : lessons from the San-Hoodia case , 2009 .

[30]  S. Wingert,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Reconciling Research: Perspectives on Research Involving Indigenous Peoples , 2017 .

[31]  J. Coffin,et al.  Creating Cultural Empathy and Challenging Attitudes Through Indigenous Narrative Project , 2012 .

[32]  H. Park,et al.  Face and Facework: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Managing Politeness Norms in the United States and Korea , 2012 .

[33]  A. Kirova,et al.  Ensemble Research: A Means for Immigrant Children to Explore Peer Relationships Through Fotonovela , 2006 .