Bounded oligarchy: How and when factions constrain leaders in party position-taking

This work investigates the process of position-taking, focussing on the factional bargaining within the party. Exploiting two recently built datasets that estimated the policy positions of Italian parties and factions from 1946 to 2010, we investigate if and to what extent factions bind the party leader in choosing the platform. We find confirmation for the idea that party positions are linked to factional preferences. Overall, the party works as a ‘bounded oligarchy’. Furthermore, the electoral payoff of party unity increases the impact of factional constraints when general elections approach. In line with the cartel party theory, however, autonomous leaders who are directly elected by a wider selectorate can get rid of factional ties choosing more moderate and vote-maximizing platforms.

[1]  Paul V. Warwick.  Coalition Policy in Parliamentary Democracies , 2001 .

[2]  Sven-Oliver Proksch,et al.  How to Avoid Pitfalls in Statistical Analysis of Political Texts: The Case of Germany , 2009, German Politics.

[3]  Scott Morgenstern.  Organized Factions and Disorganized Parties , 2001 .

[4]  M. Laver,et al.  The Evolution of Party Systems between Elections , 2003 .

[5]  K. Quinn,et al.  Identifying Intra-Party Voting Blocs in UK House of Commons , 2009 .

[6]  R. Katz.  The Problem of Candidate Selection and Models of Party Democracy , 2001 .

[7]  R. Katz,et al.  How Parties Organize : Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies , 1994 .

[8]  B. Grofman,et al.  A Unified Theory Of Party Competition , 2005 .

[9]  Carol Mershon,et al.  Legislator Preferences, Party Desires: The Impact of Party Switching on Legislative Party Positions , 2009 .

[10]  Gilat Levy,et al.  A model of political parties , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[11]  M. Laver.  Divided Parties, Divided Government , 1999 .

[12]  A. C. Tan,et al.  Party actors and party change: Does factional dominance matter? , 2003 .

[13]  Luigi Curini,et al.  Ideological proximity and valence competition: Negative campaigning through allegation of corruption in the Italian legislative arena from 1946 to 1994 , 2010 .

[14]  John H. Aldrich.  Why parties? : the origin and transformation of political parties in America , 1995 .

[15]  Françoise Boucek,et al.  Rethinking Factionalism , 2009 .

[16]  Michael Boss.  Economic theory of democracy , 1974 .

[17]  H. Klüver,et al.  Measuring Interest Group Influence Using Quantitative Text Analysis , 2009 .

[18]  A. McGann.  The Advantages of Ideological Cohesion , 2002 .

[19]  Jonathan B. Slapin,et al.  Position Taking in European Parliament Speeches , 2010 .

[20]  Marc Debus,et al.  Intra-Party Factions and Coalition Bargaining in Germany , 2009 .

[21]  Kaare W. Strøm,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties , 1990 .

[22]  M. Laver,et al.  Government Coalitions and Intraparty Politics , 1990, British Journal of Political Science.

[23]  Kenneth Benoit,et al.  FISSION AND FUSION IN A PARTY SYSTEM , 2001 .

[24]  Personalization as Americanization? The Rise and Fall of Leader-Dominated Governmental Strategies in Western Europe in The Eighties , 1994 .

[25]  K. Benoit,et al.  Challenges for Estimating Policy Preferences: Announcing an Open Access Archive of Political Documents , 2009 .

[26]  Michael Laver,et al.  Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe , 1990 .

[27]  M. Calise.  Presidentialization, Italian Style , 2005 .

[28]  Richard S. Katz,et al.  Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy , 1995 .

[29]  Martin Rhodes,et al.  Crisis and Transition in Italian Politics , 1997 .

[30]  Daniela Giannetti,et al.  The Democratici di Sinistra: In Search of a New Identity , 2006 .

[31]  Sven-Oliver Proksch,et al.  A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts , 2007 .

[32]  Reuven Y. Hazan,et al.  Democracy and Political Parties , 2008 .

[33]  A. Ceron,et al.  Parties' Influence during Government Policy Negotiations: Parliamentary Dynamics and Spatial Advantages in the First Italian Republic , 2013 .

[34]  O. Kenig.  Democratization of party leadership selection: Do wider selectorates produce more competitive contests? , 2009 .

[35]  W. Rogers.  Regression standard errors in clustered samples , 1994 .

[36]  Arthur Spirling,et al.  Identifying Intraparty Voting Blocs in the U.K. House of Commons , 2010 .

[37]  I. Budge,et al.  Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998 , 2001 .

[38]  James M. Snyder,et al.  An Informational Rationale for Political Parties , 2002 .

[39]  G. Thompson,et al.  The Theory of Committees and Elections. , 1959 .

[40]  Richard S. Katz,et al.  Democracy and elections , 1997 .

[41]  Kaare W. Strøm.  The Presthus Debacle: Intraparty Politics and Bargaining Failure in Norway , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[42]  John H. Aldrich.  A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[43]  L. Curini,et al.  Rebels with a cause-But which One?: Defections from legislative party unity in Italy and their individual and institutional determinants , 2011 .

[44]  Melvin J. Hinich,et al.  Equilibrium in spatial voting: The median voter result is an artifact , 1977 .

[45]  Kenneth Benoit,et al.  Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions , 2009 .

[46]  L. Curini.  Government survival the Italian way: The core and the advantages of policy immobilism during the First Republic , 2011 .

[47]  H. van Schuur,et al.  Where's the party? , 1997 .

[48]  P. Mair.  Party Organizations: From Civil Society to the State , 1994 .

[49]  O. Kirchheimer,et al.  6. The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems , 1966 .

[50]  Michael Marsh.  Introduction: Selecting the party leader , 1993 .

[51]  W. Müller,et al.  Policy, Office, or Votes?: Contents , 1999 .

[52]  A. Zuckerman.  The Politics of Faction: Christian Democratic Rule in Italy , 1979 .

[53]  M. Weiner,et al.  Political Parties and Political Development. , 1966 .

[54]  W. Müller,et al.  Policy, Office, or Votes?: How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions , 1999 .

[55]  John D. Huber,et al.  Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left-Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data , 2000 .

[56]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting , 1997 .

[57]  William A. Gamson,et al.  A theory of coalition formation , 1961 .

[58]  Nicholas A. Valentino,et al.  DOWNS AND TWO-PARTY CONVERGENCE , 2005 .

[59]  C. A. Beard,et al.  Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. , 1917 .

[60]  I. Budge,et al.  Ideology, Party Factionalism and Policy Change: An integrated dynamic theory , 2010, British Journal of Political Science.

[61]  Alan Ware.  Activist–Leader Relations and the Structure of Political Parties: ‘Exchange’ Models and Vote-Seeking Behaviour in Parties , 1992, British Journal of Political Science.

[62]  J. Bernauer,et al.  Intra-Party Preference Heterogeneity and Faction Membership in the 15th German Bundestag: A Computational Text Analysis of Parliamentary Speeches , 2009 .

[63]  P. Mair.  Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations , 1997 .

[64]  Carol Mershon.  Party factions and coalition government: portfolio allocation in Italian Christian Democracy ☆ , 2001 .