Keel bone damage assessment: consistency in enriched colony laying hens

ABSTRACT Damage to the keel bone is a major issue in the laying hen industry. The goal of this study was to compare palpation results of live laying hens to digital computed tomography (CT) images, to assess changes in palpation reliability as training and familiarity increased, and to examine keel bone morphology over time. The longitudinal study consisted of 2 trials of 3 observation periods using 40 different (n = 120) W‐36 hens housed in enriched colony cages. The first trial began when hens were 52 to 58 wk of age repeating the trial when the same birds were 74 to 81 wk of age. At 52 wk of age, each hen's keel bone was palpated by a single individual for keel bone caudal tip fractures (Tip), sagittal deviations (Evenness), and transverse deviations (Straightness). After palpation, each hen was placed in a motion limiting restraint and scanned using CT. The hens spent the next 21 d in their cages and on day 21, the hens were collected, palpated, and CT scanned again. The CT scans were imported into Mimics analysis software, 3D models of each keel bone were constructed and evaluated. Each bone and 3D model was scored (0, 1, 2) on the measurement of transverse deviation based on <0.5 cm, 0.51 to 1.0 cm, and >1.0 cm total deviation, respectively. Analysis of data using Proc Freq and Means in SAS 9.3 revealed minimal to moderate kappa values and moderate agreement percentages between palpators and digital analysis. The computer generated 3D models of individual keel bones were compared to palpation scores for Tip, Evenness, and Straightness at the beginning and end of each trial. The visual observations of the 3D models were qualitative, performed by a single individual. Overall, we found CT scanning to be a useful tool in observing changes to the keel bone, we observed changes in palpation accuracy as training/familiarity increased, and examined changes in keel morphology, specifically in the tip, after 52 wk of age.

[1]  F. Tuyttens,et al.  Risk factors associated with keel bone and foot pad disorders in laying hens housed in aviary systems. , 2016, Poultry science.

[2]  L. Schrader,et al.  Methods for assessment of keel bone damage in poultry. , 2015, Poultry science.

[3]  B. Tobalske,et al.  Causes of keel bone damage and their solutions in laying hens , 2015 .

[4]  D. Karcher,et al.  Duck gait: Relationship to hip angle, bone ash, bone density, and morphology. , 2015, Poultry science.

[5]  T. Widowski,et al.  On-farm comparison of keel fracture prevalence and other welfare indicators in conventional cage and floor-housed laying hens in Ontario, Canada. , 2015, Poultry science.

[6]  L. Schrader,et al.  Soft Perches in an Aviary System Reduce Incidence of Keel Bone Damage in Laying Hens , 2015, PloS one.

[7]  R. Haut,et al.  Bone characteristics and femoral strength in commercial toms: the effect of protein and energy restriction. , 2014, Poultry science.

[8]  T. Widowski,et al.  Keel fracture assessment of laying hens by palpation: inter-observer reliability and accuracy , 2013, Veterinary Record.

[9]  J. Murrell,et al.  The effect of keel fractures on egg production, feed and water consumption in individual laying hens , 2013, British poultry science.

[10]  C. Nicol,et al.  Do Laying Hens with Keel Bone Fractures Experience Pain? , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  L. Wilkins,et al.  The effect of keel fractures on egg production parameters, mobility and behaviour in individual laying hens , 2012 .

[12]  S. Gebhardt-Henrich,et al.  Prevalence of keel bone deformities in Swiss laying hens , 2011, British poultry science.

[13]  S. Brown,et al.  Influence of housing system and design on bone strength and keel bone fractures in laying hens , 2011, Veterinary Record.

[14]  S. Brown,et al.  Use of radiography to identify keel bone fractures in laying hens and assess healing in live birds , 2011, Veterinary Record.

[15]  S. Gebhardt-Henrich,et al.  Effects of housing, perches, genetics, and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on keel bone deformities in laying hens. , 2011, Poultry science.

[16]  L. Schrader,et al.  Pressure load on keel bone and foot pads in perching laying hens in relation to perch design. , 2011, Poultry science.

[17]  F. Tuyttens,et al.  Effects of perch design on behaviour and health of laying hens , 2009, Animal Welfare.

[18]  S. Brown,et al.  Investigation of palpation as a method for determining the prevalence of keel and furculum damage in laying hens , 2004, Veterinary Record.

[19]  D. Korver,et al.  Assessing bone mineral density in vivo: quantitative computed tomography. , 2004, Poultry science.

[20]  M. Appleby.  Should Cages for Laying Hens Be Banned or Modified? , 1993, Animal Welfare.

[21]  Richard Walker,et al.  Using Macro to simplify to Calculate Multi-Rater Observation Agreement , 2012 .

[22]  R C Newberry,et al.  Hen welfare in different housing systems. , 2011, Poultry science.