Cooperative Knowledge Representation and Classification for Design Projects

Design is a knowledge-intense activity. In design projects, both domain knowledge and cooperative knowledge are produced. Present knowledge engineering methods focus on how to extract and model expert knowledge, but cooperative knowledge that is produced in cooperative activities is usually ignored. In this paper, the cooperative knowledge in design projects is studied, and a cooperative knowledge representation structure as well as a framework to classify it is proposed.

[1]  Thomas G. Dietterich Learning at the Knowledge Level , 1986, Machine Learning.

[2]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[3]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Taking CSCW seriously , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[4]  Nada Matta,et al.  Project Situations Aggregation to Identify Cooperative Problem Solving Strategies , 2006, KES.

[5]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification , 2009 .

[7]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work * , 1992 .

[8]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  An Information Theoretic Approach to Rule Induction from Databases , 1992, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[9]  William A. Wulf,et al.  Capturing design rationale in concurrent engineering teams , 1993 .

[10]  Manuel Zacklad,et al.  Communities of action: a cognitive and social approach to the design of CSCW systems , 2003, GROUP '03.

[11]  Guillaume Ducellier,et al.  Traceability of design project knowledge using PLM , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS).

[12]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  Representation of Activity Knowledge for Project Management , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  Francis Miksa,et al.  The DDC, the Universe of Knowledge, and the Post-Modern Library , 1999 .

[14]  Henri Cohen,et al.  Handbook of categorization in cognitive science , 2005 .

[15]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management , 2003 .

[16]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Design rationale: concepts, techniques, and use , 1996 .

[17]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations , 2000 .

[18]  N. Matta,et al.  Definition of a practical learning system , 2005, 2005 6th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training.

[19]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Foundations for service ontologies: aligning OWL-S to dolce , 2004, WWW '04.

[20]  Guillaume Ducellier,et al.  Traceability and structuring of cooperative knowledge in design using PLM , 2013 .

[21]  Bob J. Wielinga,et al.  CommonKADS: a comprehensive methodology for KBS development , 1994, IEEE Expert.

[22]  Setrag Khoshafian,et al.  Introduction to Groupware, Workflow, and Workgroup Computing , 1995 .

[23]  Cao Feng,et al.  STATLOG: COMPARISON OF CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS ON LARGE REAL-WORLD PROBLEMS , 1995 .

[24]  Jens-Erik Mai,et al.  Classification in context: Relativity, reality, and representation , 2004 .

[25]  Michael L. Begeman,et al.  gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion , 1988, CSCW '88.

[26]  Pedro M. Domingos A few useful things to know about machine learning , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[27]  Allen Newell,et al.  The Knowledge Level , 1989, Artif. Intell..