Robot guidance of an ultrasound probe toward a 3D region of interest detected through X-ray mammography

PurposeThis research is situated in the context of breast cancer detection where the standard procedure is the succession of an initial mammography (MX) examination and a supplementary ultrasound (US) scan. One major difficulty of this procedure results from the fact that breast geometry changes between both examinations due to different patient’s positions. The proposed system facilitates this combined examination by keeping the breast geometry and by adding a US probe guidance robot to the mammography system.MethodsA comanipulation system is set up where the robot and user simultaneously manipulate the probe toward the target previously localized in MX images. Calibration procedures and robot control are detailed.ResultsA test protocol was presented to conduct two tests that are both related to the medical application. The first tests aim at evaluating robot guidance for localizing a lesion which was previously defined in the X-ray images. The second tests aim at quantifying robot influence when scanning a target lesion. The studied task consists of a pointing/scanning exercise, where the US beam intersects a breast lesion.ConclusionsThe experiments show a significant increase in examination quality when using robot guidance as compared to the nonassisted examination.

[1]  C. Merritt Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer , 2009 .

[2]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. , 2008, JAMA.

[3]  Baudouin Maldague,et al.  Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Brian L. Davies,et al.  A mechatronic based robotic system for knee surgery , 1997, Proceedings Intelligent Information Systems. IIS'97.

[5]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[6]  E A Sickles,et al.  Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: A retrospective review , 1996, Cancer.

[7]  Stuart S Kaplan,et al.  Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. , 2001, Radiology.

[8]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  PADyC: a synergistic robot for cardiac puncturing , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[9]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  O Schneider,et al.  A six-degree-of-freedom passive arm with dynamic constraints (PADyC) for cardiac surgery application: preliminary experiments. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[11]  Vincent Françoise,et al.  A comanipulation device for orthopedic surgery that generates geometrical constraints with real-time registration on moving bones , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[12]  Nicola A. Pisano Occult Breast Masses : Use of a Mammographic Localizing Grid for US Evaluation , 2017 .

[13]  Guillaume Morel,et al.  Hand-eye self-calibration of an ultrasound image-based robotic system , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  Wisama Khalil,et al.  Modeling, performance analysis and control of robot manipulators , 2007 .

[15]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? , 2002, Radiology.

[16]  Eric Bonneau,et al.  SURGICOBOT: SURGICAL GESTURE ASSISTANCE COBOT FOR MAXILLO-FACIAL INTERVENTIONS , 2004 .

[17]  W. Buchberger,et al.  Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. , 2000, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[18]  A. Kapur,et al.  Combination of Digital Mammography with Semi-automated 3D Breast Ultrasound , 2004, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[19]  Jennifer A Harvey,et al.  Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. , 2004, Radiology.

[20]  Wisama Khalil,et al.  Robot Manipulators: Modeling, Performance Analysis and Control , 2007 .

[21]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Human-Machine Collaborative Systems for Microsurgical Applications , 2005, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[22]  J.F. Krucker,et al.  Evaluation of thin compression paddles for mammographically compatible ultrasound , 2004, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004.