Super-resolution land cover mapping using a Markov random field based approach

Abstract Occurrence of mixed pixels in remote sensing images is a major problem particularly at coarse spatial resolutions. Therefore, sub-pixel classification is often preferred, where a pixel is resolved into various class components (also called class proportions or fractions). While, under most circumstances, land cover information in this form is more effective than crisp classification, sub-pixel classification fails to account for the spatial distribution of class proportions within the pixel. An alternative approach is to consider the spatial distribution of class proportions within and between pixels to perform super-resolution mapping (i.e. mapping land cover at a spatial resolution finer than the size of the pixel of the image). Markov random field (MRF) models are well suited to represent the spatial dependence within and between pixels. In this paper, an MRF model based approach is introduced to generate super-resolution land cover maps from remote sensing data. In the proposed MRF model based approach, the intensity values of pixels in a particular spatial structure (i.e., neighborhood) are allowed to have higher probability (i.e., weight) than others. Remote sensing images at two markedly different spatial resolutions, IKONOS MSS image at 4 m spatial resolution and Landsat ETM+ image at 30 m spatial resolution, are used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed MRF model based approach for super-resolution land cover mapping. The results show a significant increase in the accuracy of land cover maps at fine spatial resolution over that obtained from a recently proposed linear optimization approach suggested by Verhoeye and Wulf (2002) (Verhoeye, J., Wulf, R. D. (2002). Land Cover Mapping at Sub-pixel Scales using Linear Optimization Techniques. Remote Sensing of Environment, 79 , 96–104).

[1]  Gerhard Winkler,et al.  Image analysis, random fields and dynamic Monte Carlo methods: a mathematical introduction , 1995, Applications of mathematics.

[2]  Paul Aplin,et al.  Sub-pixel land cover mapping for per-field classification , 2001 .

[3]  L. P. C. Verbeke,et al.  Using genetic algorithms in sub-pixel mapping , 2003 .

[4]  Martin Brown,et al.  Linear spectral mixture models and support vector machines for remote sensing , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  R. DeFries,et al.  Classification trees: an alternative to traditional land cover classifiers , 1996 .

[6]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  An image change detection algorithm based on Markov random field models , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  Robert De Wulf,et al.  Land cover mapping at sub-pixel scales using linear optimization techniques , 2002 .

[8]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Super-resolution target identification from remotely sensed images using a Hopfield neural network , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  Manoj K. Arora,et al.  Support Vector Machines for Classification of Multi- and Hyperspectral Data , 2004 .

[10]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images: An Introduction , 1988 .

[11]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  A Markov random field model for classification of multisource satellite imagery , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  John Odentrantz,et al.  Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues , 2000, Technometrics.

[13]  Fawwaz T. Ulaby,et al.  SAR speckle reduction using wavelet denoising and Markov random field modeling , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  J. Bezdek,et al.  FCM: The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm , 1984 .

[15]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Increasing the spatial resolution of agricultural land cover maps using a Hopfield neural network , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .

[17]  Masayuki Tamura,et al.  Accuracy of land cover area estimated from coarse spatial resolution images using an unmixing method , 2004 .

[18]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  Classification of multisource remote sensing imagery using a genetic algorithm and Markov random fields , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[19]  Andrew J. Tatem Super-resolution land cover mapping from remotely sensed imagery using a Hopfield neural network , 2001 .

[20]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Super-resolution land cover pattern prediction using a Hopfield neural network , 2002 .

[21]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classifications from remotely-sensed data , 1996 .

[22]  G. Foody,et al.  Sub-pixel land cover composition estimation using a linear mixture model and fuzzy membership functions , 1994 .

[23]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Automatic analysis of the difference image for unsupervised change detection , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[24]  Sridhar Lakshmanan,et al.  Simultaneous Parameter Estimation and Segmentation of Gibbs Random Fields Using Simulated Annealing , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[25]  J. Settle,et al.  Linear mixing and the estimation of ground cover proportions , 1993 .

[26]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[27]  G. Foody Sharpening fuzzy classification output to refine the representation of sub-pixel land cover distribution , 1998 .

[28]  Elisabetta Binaghi,et al.  A fuzzy set-based accuracy assessment of soft classification , 1999, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[29]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Distributed Detection and Data Fusion , 1996 .

[30]  Vikash Kumar,et al.  A MRF model-based segmentation approach to classification for multispectral imagery , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[31]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Estimation of sub-pixel land cover composition in the presence of untrained classes , 2000 .

[32]  Ryuei Nishii A Markov random field-based approach to decision-level fusion for remote sensing image classification , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[33]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Uncertainty in remote sensing and GIS , 2002 .

[34]  Lieven Verbeke,et al.  Sub-pixel mapping and sub-pixel sharpening using neural network predicted wavelet coefficients , 2004 .