The Usefulness of Experimental Auctions in Determining Consumers' Willingness-to-Pay for Quality-Differentiated Products

The validity and effectiveness of using experimental auctions to elicit consumers' willingness-to-pay for closely related, quality-differentiated products is examined. The effect of panelists' demographics on bid values and auction winners, and the impact of experimental procedures on auction prices are analyzed. Demographic variables are poor predictors of bids and auction winners. Experimental procedures such as panel size and initial endowment influence market price level. Relative bid differences for paired samples are primarily influenced by relative differences in taste panel ratings. Relative willingness-to-pay values elicited through experimental auctions appear valid, while actual willingness-to-pay values are influenced by experimental design.

[1]  Dillon M. Feuz,et al.  U.S. consumer preference and willingness-to-pay for domestic corn-fed beef versus international grass-fed beef measured through an experimental auction , 2002 .

[2]  Mark A. Olson,et al.  Experimental Comparisons of Auctions Under Single- and Multi-Unit Demand , 1998 .

[3]  Dale J. Menkhaus,et al.  Using Laboratory Experimental Auctions in Marketing Research: A Case Study of New Packaging for Fresh Beef , 1993 .

[4]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[5]  Dale J. Menkhaus,et al.  An Empirical Application of Laboratory Experimental Auctions in Marketing Research , 1992 .

[6]  Bid Sensitivity and the Structure of the Vickrey Auction , 1994 .

[7]  V. Smith,et al.  Experimental Tests of an Allocation Mechanism for Private, Public or Externality Goods* , 1984 .

[8]  John A. List,et al.  Using Random nth Price Auctions to Value Non-Market Goods and Services , 2003 .

[9]  T. Schroeder,et al.  Will Consumers Pay for Guaranteed Tender Steak , 1999 .

[10]  Chapter 06: EXPERIMENTAL AUCTIONS TO MEASURE WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR FOOD SAFETY , 1995 .

[11]  D. Hennessy,et al.  CONSUMERS' VALUATION OF INSECTICIDE USE RESTRICTIONS: AN APPLICATION TO APPLES , 1998 .

[12]  John A. List,et al.  A random nth-price auction , 2001 .

[13]  J. Shogren,et al.  Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept , 1997 .

[14]  John A. List,et al.  Preference Learning in Consecutive Experimental Auctions , 2000 .

[15]  J. Shogren,et al.  Valuing Ambiguity: The Case of Genetically Engineered Growth Enhancers , 1993 .

[16]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Demand Reduction in Multi-Unit Auctions: Evidence from a Sportscard Field Experiment: Reply , 2005 .

[17]  W. Huffman,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Fresh Food Items with Multiple Quality Attributes: Evidence from an Experimental Auction of Pork Chops , 1996 .

[18]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[19]  O. Capps.  Utilizing Scanner Data to Estimate Retail Demand Functions for Meat Products , 1989 .

[20]  James Kliebenstein,et al.  Valuing Food Safety in Experimental Auction Markets , 1995 .