Radial artery access as a predictor of increased radiation exposure during a diagnostic cardiac catheterization procedure.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Changchun Xie | Mathew Mercuri | S. Mehta | C. Xie | M. Natarajan | J. Velianou | M. Mercuri | Madhu K Natarajan | James L Velianou | N. Valettas | Shamir Mehta | Nicholas Valettas | Nicholas Valettas
[1] C. Xie,et al. Predictors of increased radiation dose during percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.
[2] Stephen Balter,et al. ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[3] A. Dibié,et al. Factors influencing fluoroscopy time and dose-area product values during ad hoc one-vessel percutaneous coronary angioplasty. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.
[4] Donald L. Miller,et al. Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: Time for a safer environment , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[5] Cheryl Anne Smith. Implementing a nursing internship program. , 2008, Healthcare quarterly.
[6] H. Lange,et al. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention by radial or femoral approach , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[7] E. Kuon. Radiation exposure in invasive cardiology , 2008, Heart.
[8] K. Faulkner,et al. Patient dose values in a dedicated Greek cardiac centre. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.
[9] Salim Yusuf,et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2009, American heart journal.
[10] A. Gafni,et al. Insight into capacity planning for cardiac catheterization services: Policy lessons learned from “Looking in the Mirror” over a decade , 2009, Health Policy.
[11] Stephen Balter,et al. ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task , 2005, Circulation.
[12] B. Strauss,et al. Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction--the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial. , 2005, American heart journal.
[13] D. Metz,et al. Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes. , 2008, European heart journal.
[14] M. Sandborg,et al. Evaluation of patient-absorbed doses during coronary angiography and intervention by femoral and radial artery access , 2004, European Radiology.
[15] D. Patel,et al. Radial versus femoral access for rescue percutaneous coronary intervention with adjuvant glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use. , 2004, The Canadian journal of cardiology.
[16] C. J. Kotre,et al. Is patient size important in dose determination and optimization in cardiology? , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.
[17] J. Moses,et al. Managing patient dose in interventional cardiology , 2007, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[18] T. Sheth,et al. Radiation dose in interventional cardiology procedures: urgent need for monitoring dose and establishing diagnostic reference levels. , 2008, Healthcare quarterly.