Cumulative burden of clinically significant aortic stenosis in community-dwelling older adults

Objectives Current estimates of aortic stenosis (AS) frequency have mostly relied on cross-sectional echocardiographic or longitudinal administrative data, making understanding of AS burden incomplete. We performed case adjudications to evaluate the frequency of AS and assess differences by age, sex and race in an older cohort with long-term follow-up. Methods We developed case-capture methods using study echocardiograms, procedure and diagnosis codes, heart failure events and deaths for targeted review of medical records in the Cardiovascular Health Study to identify moderate or severe AS and related procedures or hospitalisations. The primary outcome was clinically significant AS (severe AS or procedure). Assessment of incident AS burden was based on subdistribution survival methods, while associations with age, sex and race relied on cause-specific survival methods. Results The cohort comprised 5795 participants (age 73±6, 42.2% male, 14.3% Black). Cumulative frequency of clinically significant AS at maximal 25-year follow-up was 3.69% (probable/definite) to 4.67% (possible/probable/definite), while the corresponding 20-year cumulative incidence was 2.88% to 3.71%. Of incident cases, about 85% had a hospitalisation for severe AS, but roughly half did not undergo valve intervention. The adjusted incidence of clinically significant AS was higher in men (HR 1.62 [95% CI 1.21 to 2.17]) and increased with age (HR 1.08 [95% CI 1.04 to 1.11]), but was lower in Blacks (HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.23 to 0.81]). Conclusions In this community-based study, we identified a higher burden of clinically significant AS than reported previously, with differences by age, sex and race. These findings have important implications for public health resource planning, although the lower burden in Blacks merits further study.

[1]  T. H. Nguyen,et al.  Global, Regional, and National Burden of Calcific Aortic Valve and Degenerative Mitral Valve Diseases, 1990–2017 , 2020, Circulation.

[2]  P. Bůžková,et al.  Assessing risk factors of non-fatal outcomes amid a competing risk of mortality: the example of hip fracture , 2019, Osteoporosis International.

[3]  D. Holmes,et al.  Effect of Race on the Incidence of Aortic Stenosis and Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States , 2018, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[4]  S. Solomon,et al.  Ideal Cardiovascular Health and the Prevalence and Severity of Aortic Stenosis in Elderly Patients , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[5]  J. Smith,et al.  Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in a Swedish nationwide hospital-based register study , 2017, Heart.

[6]  P. Sengupta,et al.  Is TAVR Ready for the Global Aging Population? , 2017, Global heart.

[7]  Kelvin K. W. Chan,et al.  Association Between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Aortic Stenosis: The CANHEART Aortic Stenosis Study. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  E. Frangou,et al.  Large-scale community echocardiographic screening reveals a major burden of undiagnosed valvular heart disease in older people: the OxVALVE Population Cohort Study. , 2016, European heart journal.

[9]  C. Otto,et al.  Calcific aortic stenosis , 2016, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[10]  Jason P. Fine,et al.  Statistical Primer for Cardiovascular Research Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks , 2022 .

[11]  L. Kuller,et al.  Study of Cardiovascular Health Outcomes in the Era of Claims Data: The Cardiovascular Health Study , 2016, Circulation.

[12]  M. Dweck,et al.  Calcification in Aortic Stenosis: The Skeleton Key. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  V. Gudnason,et al.  The prevalence of aortic stenosis in the elderly in Iceland and predictions for the coming decades: the AGES-Reykjavík study. , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[14]  J. Hansen,et al.  Assessment of risk factors for developing incident aortic stenosis: the Tromsø Study , 2014, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[15]  Nancy M Albert,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  F. Harrell,et al.  Racial Differences in the Prevalence of Severe Aortic Stenosis , 2014, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[17]  A. Bogers,et al.  Aortic stenosis in the elderly: disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and modeling study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  C. Berry,et al.  The changing course of aortic valve disease in Scotland: temporal trends in hospitalizations and mortality and prognostic importance of aortic stenosis. , 2013, European heart journal.

[19]  H. Schirmer,et al.  The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. The Tromsø Study , 2012, Heart.

[20]  V. Jeevanandam,et al.  Reasons for nonadherence to guidelines for aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and potential solutions. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  C. Schmid,et al.  A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.

[22]  B. Andersson,et al.  Growth factors and interleukin-6 across the lung circulation in pulmonary hypertension , 2009, European Respiratory Journal.

[23]  B. Psaty,et al.  Clinical factors, but not C-reactive protein, predict progression of calcific aortic-valve disease: the Cardiovascular Health Study. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  J. Gardin,et al.  Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study , 2006, The Lancet.

[25]  R A Kronmal,et al.  Risk factors for 5-year mortality in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. , 1998, JAMA.

[26]  Bonnie K. Lind,et al.  Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  J. Heikkilä,et al.  Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  R. Kronmal,et al.  The Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale. , 1991, Annals of epidemiology.

[29]  Ian G. Cook,et al.  Aging in the United States , 2012 .

[30]  H. S. Klopfenstein,et al.  Echocardiographic design of a multicenter investigation of free-living elderly subjects: the Cardiovascular Health Study. , 1992, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.