Developing a Scoring Matrix to Evaluate the Usability of Consumer Packaging

The goal of the current study was to test a scoring matrix for evaluating and quantifying the difficulty of use of consumer packaging for an older adult population. Scores range from 0 to 100; the lower the score, the less usable the packaging design. Twelve older adults (9 females, 3 males; Mage = 69.5) completed an online survey in which they evaluated 15 everyday packaging types on frequency of use and difficulty of the functional tasks required for use (e.g., pick up and carry, remove seal, open, dispense, close). Blister packaging scored the lowest (M = 71.5) and could benefit the most from redesign. Microwave meal packaging scored the highest (M = 85.8), but this was the only score computed without all participants; only five participants reported using microwave meals. Pull tab cans scored second highest with a mean score of 84.2. In this pilot study, we are laying the groundwork for creating a tool to systematically evaluate and quantify the usability of all packaging types.

[1]  M. Lawton,et al.  Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living , 1969 .

[2]  James Baldwin,et al.  Food and drink packaging: who is complaining and who should be complaining. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  A. Yoxall,et al.  Accessing packaged food and beverages in hospital. Exploring experiences of patients and staff , 2013, Appetite.

[4]  Federal Inter-Agency Forum on Aging Related Stats.  Older Americans 2012: Key Indicators of Well-Being , 2012 .

[5]  Cengiz Caner,et al.  Consumer complaints and accidents related to food packaging , 2010 .

[6]  L. M. Duizer,et al.  Requirements for packaging from an ageing consumer's perspective , 2009 .

[7]  P John Clarkson,et al.  Designing packaging to support the safe use of medicines at home. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  M. Lawton,et al.  Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. , 1969, The Gerontologist.

[9]  Sydney Katz.  Assessing Self‐maintenance: Activities of Daily Living, Mobility, and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living , 1983, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[10]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Design for People with Functional Limitations , 2012 .

[11]  William H. Cushman,et al.  Human Factors in Product Design , 1991 .

[12]  H Kanis,et al.  Operation of Controls on Consumer Products by Physically Impaired Users , 1993, Human factors.

[13]  G. Yue,et al.  Effects of Aging on Hand Function , 2001, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[14]  R Haigh,et al.  The ageing process: a challenge for design. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.