Sentence repetition as a measure of early grammatical development in Italian.

BACKGROUND Research on language acquisition and disorders highlights the need to evaluate the early phases of language development for the early identification of children with language problems (screening), and to determine the nature and severity of language disorders (diagnosis). AIMS The paper presents a new Sentence Repetition Task developed for evaluating language abilities in Italian pre-schoolers. Two studies are reported. The first is aimed at evaluating the power of the Sentence Repetition Task in discriminating the developmental changes in children's capacity to repeat sentences of different length and morphosyntactic complexity. Moreover, the test-retest reliability was assessed. The second study explored the relationship between the Sentence Repetition Task, free speech and verbal memory span. METHODS & PROCEDURES The test included 27 sentences of different length and complexity. Each sentence was accompanied with a picture reproducing its global meaning. In Study 1, the Sentence Repetition Task was administrated to 100 middle- and lower-class children (balanced for gender) between 2 and 4 years with a test-retest design. Test results were submitted to univariate analysis of variance, using five age levels as independent variables. To evaluate the test reliability, test-retest correlational analyses were conducted. In Study 2, 25 middle- and lower-class children between 2 and 4 years of age, balanced for age and gender, participated. The performance of the children on the repetition test was compared with their spontaneous language data. Moreover, the same children received a Verbal Memory Span test, consisting of a list of ten strings of different number of words. Correlational analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationships between the Sentence Repetition Task, free speech and the Verbal Memory Span test. OUTCOMES & RESULTS Study 1 showed that 2-year-old children's repeated sentences were highly telegraphic. Between the age of 2.0 and 2.6 the mean length of utterance in the Sentence Repetition Task grew from approximately two to three words, and the number of omissions of articles, prepositions and modifiers significantly decreased. After 3.0 years old, omissions of free function words practically disappeared. The results of Study 2 showed that mean length of utterance, omission of articles and use of the verbs in the Sentence Repetition Task correlated with the same measures of the free speech. Moreover, positive correlations were found between verbal memory span and performance of both the repetition task and the free speech. CONCLUSIONS Results demonstrate that the repetition test is reliable, discriminates between the different age groups examined, highlights the relevant developmental stages described in the literature, and provides a reliable measure of the mean length of utterance.

[1]  M. Maratsos,et al.  What Children Can Say Before They Will. , 1975 .

[2]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Working Memory and Language , 2018, Working Memories.

[3]  Robbie Case,et al.  A New Measure for Determining Children's Subjective Organization of Speech. , 1980 .

[4]  P. Lightbown,et al.  Structure and variation in child language. , 1975 .

[5]  R. Simone,et al.  Fondamenti di linguistica , 1990 .

[6]  M. C. Caselli,et al.  Italian children's use of verb and noun morphology during the preschool years* , 2002 .

[7]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  First Language Acquisition , 2002, The Study of Language.

[8]  M. C. Caselli,et al.  Asynchrony of lexical and morphosyntactic development in children with Down Syndrome , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  J B Tomblin,et al.  Nonword repetition performance in school-age children with and without language impairment. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[10]  J. Dockrell Assessing language skills in preschool children , 2001 .

[11]  L B Leonard,et al.  Grammatical deficits in Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  M. C. Caselli,et al.  The acquisition of Italian morphology: implications for models of language development , 1992, Journal of Child Language.

[13]  M. J. Demetras,et al.  The identification of language impairment in the selection of specifically language-impaired subjects. , 1990, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[14]  P. Freo,et al.  Un test di ripetizione di frasi: Analisi delle performances di bambini normali , 1981 .

[15]  Joanna Blake,et al.  The Relationship between Memory Span and Measures of Imitative and Spontaneous Language Complexity in Preschool Children , 1994 .

[16]  Antonella Devescovi,et al.  Una prova di ripetizione di frasi per la valutazione del primo sviluppo grammaticale , 2001 .

[17]  G. Conti-Ramsden,et al.  Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI). , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[18]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  ELICITED IMITATION AS A RESEARCH TOOL IN DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLINGUISTICS. , 1967 .

[19]  V. Volterra,et al.  What atypical populations can reveal about language development: The contrast between deafness and Williams syndrome , 2001 .

[20]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements , 1990, On Language.

[21]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition. , 1997 .

[22]  C. Nelli L'acquisizione della morfologia libera italiana. Fasi di un percorso evolutivo , 1998 .

[23]  E. Bates,et al.  A comparison of the transition from first words to grammar in English and Italian , 1999, Journal of Child Language.

[24]  R. Brown A First Language , 1973 .

[25]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The phonological loop as a language learning device. , 1998, Psychological review.

[26]  D. Brizzolara,et al.  “Developmental Dysmnesia”: A Case Report , 1999, Cortex.

[27]  M. C. Caselli,et al.  Language acquisition in special populations: a comparison between Down and Williams syndromes , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  C Donlan,et al.  Nonword repetition as a behavioural marker for inherited language impairment: evidence from a twin study. , 1996, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[29]  A preliminary evaluation of grammatical capacity in Children , 1963 .

[30]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production , 1963 .

[31]  Celia A. Brownell,et al.  Combinatorial skills: converging developments over the second year. , 1988, Child development.

[32]  R. McCauley,et al.  Psychometric review of language and articulation tests for preschool children. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[33]  L B Leonard,et al.  Toward mastery of Italian morphology: a cross-sectional study , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[34]  Lunella Mereu La sintassi delle lingue del mondo , 2004 .

[35]  E. Bates Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics , 1976 .

[36]  Joanna Blake,et al.  Routes to Child Language: Evolutionary and Developmental Precursors , 2000 .